Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
The data shows small gaps on dry lap pace but meaningful, repeated differences in safety-critical areas. Michelin brakes shorter on wet and snow, resists aquaplaning better, and posts far superior wear and rolling resistance. Falken counters with agreeable comfort, low noise, and competitive wet/dry handling feel at a lower purchase price, but its snow performance and longevity lag.

Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been eight tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 | eight |
While it might look like the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 is better than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Comfortable and quiet ride; strong subjective comfort scores
- Competent wet/dry handling feel; occasional wins in wet handling/circle
- Good straight-line aquaplaning resistance in some tests
- Lower purchase price than premium rivals
- Class-leading snow performance (braking, traction, handling) across all tests
- Shorter wet and dry braking with better aquaplaning safety margins
- Significantly lower rolling resistance and markedly better wear
- Refined NVH and precise handling; frequent overall test winner
Dry Braking
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during five dry braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stopped the vehicle in 2.51% less distance than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Dry Braking: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 0.62% faster around a lap than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during five dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 0.68% faster around a lap than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro and Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 performed equally well in subj. dry handling tests.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from eight tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stopped the vehicle in 3.7% less distance than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Wet Braking: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 0.76% faster around a wet lap than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during four wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 1.33% faster around a wet lap than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro and Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 performed equally well in subj. wet handling tests.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro had 0.41% higher lateral wet grip than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Wet Circle: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during five straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 floated at a 3.11% higher speed than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 slipped out at a 4.94% higher speed than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from eight tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during eight snow braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stopped the vehicle in 7.54% less distance than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Snow Braking: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 accelerated 9.92% faster than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Snow Traction: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during five snow traction tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had 9.09% better snow traction than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Snow Traction: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 7.06% faster around a lap than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Snow Handling [s]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during five snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 5.56% faster around a lap than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Snow Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scored 10% more points than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during three snow slalom tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 8.43% faster through a slalom than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro scored 0.65% more points than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during four noise tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 measured 1.85% quieter than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Noise: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two wear tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 is predicted to cover 28.35% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Wear: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one value tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 proved to have a 1.56% better value based on price/1000km than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Value: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during two price tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro cost 25.24% less than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Price: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during six rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had a 6.17% lower rolling resistance than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro and Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
In total the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro has been reviewed 4 times and drivers have given the tyre 89% overall.
The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 has been reviewed 29 times and drivers have given the tyre 86% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.
Conclusion
The Eurowinter HS02 Pro can feel composed in the wet and dry and rides quietly, but its extended braking distances in poor conditions, weaker snow grip, high rolling resistance, and faster wear limit its appeal where winter tyres are most needed. Choose Michelin if you value top-tier safety, balance, refinement, and durability; pick Falken only for milder climates with infrequent snow where comfort and initial price are priorities.
Key Differences
- Snow performance: Michelin consistently faster and stops shorter (e.g., −11% to −14% snow braking vs Falken).
- Wet braking: Michelin shorter by ~5-7% across major tests.
- Aquaplaning: Michelin stronger in straight and curved metrics; Falken shows limited reserves.
- Wear/longevity: Michelin projects ~40% more mileage (e.g., 41-47k km vs 29-34k km for Falken).
- Efficiency: Michelin has lower rolling resistance in every shared measurement.
- Comfort/value nuance: Falken rides quieter/softer and is cheaper upfront, but Michelin's lifetime cost can be lower thanks to wear.
Overall Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.