3 tests, 2025 to 2026
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 11%
Record by discipline
Where the Star Performer Stratos UHP finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 1 | P18 of 31 | 43% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 3 | P38 of 44.3 | 14% | - |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | 1 | P28 of 31 | 10% | - |
| Wet Circle | 1 | P26 of 30 | 14% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 1 | P29 of 31 | 7% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 1 | P22 of 31 | 30% | - |
| Snow Traction | 1 | P11 of 31 | 67% | - |
| Ice | ||||
| Ice Braking | 1 | P21 of 31 | 33% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Noise | 1 | P11 of 31 | 67% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 1 | P10 of 31 | 70% | - |
| Fuel Consumption | 1 | P1 of 31 | 100% | 1 |
| Abrasion | 1 | P11 of 31 | 67% | - |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tyres that have most often shared a test with the Star Performer Stratos UHP. Only tyres tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 3 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.
Weak wet braking is the repeated limitation of the Star Performer Stratos UHP across three winter tests. In Auto Bild's 2026 Winter Tyre Braking Test it was 40th of 50, with a stopping distance 39.4% longer than the best. Its 2025 Auto Bild wet-braking result was also near the back, 46th of 52 and 34.6% behind. ADAC placed it 27th of 31 overall in 2025 and rated wet-road safety poorly, describing very low grip and early understeer and oversteer. Wet braking was 28th of 31 on both surfaces, and straight-line aquaplaning resistance was 29th.
Efficiency and predicted life were more favourable in that ADAC comparison: it shared the lowest fuel consumption at 5.6 l/100km and had the tenth-highest projected mileage, 60,000 km. Snow traction was 11th of 31, but snow braking was only 22nd despite a positive written assessment, so snow performance was not uniformly strong. Dry braking was 18th, while the tester criticised imprecise steering and the need for constant corrections. The environmental results therefore sit alongside poor wet-road safety, rather than compensating for it in the driving verdict.
Performance Strengths
-
Rolling resistance
Minor
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
- Joint-lowest fuel consumption, 5.6 l/100km, 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test
good efficiency thanks to low weight and fuel consumption
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test (2025)
-
Tread life
Minor
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
- 10th of 31 for projected mileage, 60,000 km, 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test
very high predicted mileage, good tyre wear
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test (2025)
- Snow traction Minor in 1 of 1 tests
Performance Weaknesses
-
Wet braking
Strong
Details
- 40th of 50, 39.4% longer than best, 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Braking Test
- 46th of 52, 34.6% longer than best, 2025 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Braking Test
- 28th of 31 on asphalt and concrete, 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test
-
Wet grip
Minor
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
- 26th of 30 for wet circle performance, 29% behind best, 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test
- Tester described very low wet grip and early understeer and oversteer, 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test
very low grip and limit performance
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test (2025)
-
Aquaplaning resistance
Minor
Details
- 29th of 31 for straight-line aquaplaning resistance, 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test
-
Steering feel
Minor
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
- Imprecise dry steering requiring constant corrections, 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test
imprecise handling requiring constant corrections
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test (2025)
-
Wet handling
Strong
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
very early under/oversteering tendencies and poor force combination compared to other test products
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test (2025)
Every test, newest first 3
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test
The Star Performer Stratos UHP receives just satisfactory ratings on dry roads and clearly satisfactory on winter surfaces, but poor on wet roads, resulting in poor overall driving safety despite good environmental performance for a poor overall judgment. On dry roads, it shows adequate responsiveness and steering feedback with imprecise handling requiring constant corrections, oversteering tendencies during dynamic maneuvers with adequate limit behavior, and just manages good braking distances. On wet surfaces, it receives poor ratings overall with very early under/oversteering tendencies and poor force combination compared to other test products, plus very low grip and limit performance, with only adequate braking and lateral aquaplaning but satisfactory longitudinal aquaplaning. In winter conditions, it achieves satisfactory ratings overall with good snow braking and traction performance, but only satisfactory handling and ice braking with adequately precise control, moderate limits, and early under/oversteering tendencies requiring better force combination. This Chinese-manufactured tyre receives clearly good environmental ratings with very high predicted mileage, good tyre wear, and good efficiency thanks to low weight and fuel consumption.
Back to the Star Performer Stratos UHP overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Star Performer tyres

