Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
205/55 R16
Tyres tested
20
Disciplines
15

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
38.6 m -4.40 m 0 km/h
43 m Best 0 km/h
RefReference All Season
43.1 m +0.10 m 6 km/h
43.5 m +0.50 m 14 km/h
43.7 m +0.70 m 16 km/h
43.9 m +0.90 m 19 km/h
43.9 m +0.90 m 19 km/h
43.9 m +0.90 m 19 km/h
44 m +1.00 m 20 km/h
44.1 m +1.10 m 21 km/h
44.1 m +1.10 m 21 km/h
44.4 m +1.40 m 23 km/h
44.5 m +1.50 m 24 km/h
44.7 m +1.70 m 25 km/h
45 m +2.00 m 27 km/h
45.1 m +2.10 m 28 km/h
45.2 m +2.20 m 29 km/h
45.2 m +2.20 m 29 km/h
45.5 m +2.50 m 30 km/h
46 m +3.00 m 33 km/h
46.3 m +3.30 m 35 km/h
46.4 m +3.40 m 35 km/h
RefReference Budget
47.9 m +4.90 m 42 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 24.1% (9.3 m ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 would still be travelling at 35 km/h when the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
115 km/h +4.40 km/h
RefReference All Season
112.6 km/h +2.00 km/h
110.6 km/h Best
110.2 km/h -0.40 km/h
109.9 km/h -0.70 km/h
109.9 km/h -0.70 km/h
109.8 km/h -0.80 km/h
109.8 km/h -0.80 km/h
109.6 km/h -1.00 km/h
109.4 km/h -1.20 km/h
109.3 km/h -1.30 km/h
109.3 km/h -1.30 km/h
109.2 km/h -1.40 km/h
109.2 km/h -1.40 km/h
109.1 km/h -1.50 km/h
109 km/h -1.60 km/h
109 km/h -1.60 km/h
108.9 km/h -1.70 km/h
108.8 km/h -1.80 km/h
108.8 km/h -1.80 km/h
108.3 km/h -2.30 km/h
108.2 km/h -2.40 km/h
RefReference Budget
106.3 km/h -4.30 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (8.7 Km/H).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 5 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
52.9 m -1.10 m 0 km/h
54 m Best 0 km/h
54 m Best 0 km/h
RefReference All Season
54.7 m +0.70 m 15 km/h
55.4 m +1.40 m 21 km/h
55.6 m +1.60 m 22 km/h
56.2 m +2.20 m 26 km/h
56.6 m +2.60 m 28 km/h
56.9 m +2.90 m 29 km/h
57.1 m +3.10 m 30 km/h
57.5 m +3.50 m 32 km/h
57.7 m +3.70 m 33 km/h
57.9 m +3.90 m 34 km/h
57.9 m +3.90 m 34 km/h
58.3 m +4.30 m 35 km/h
58.5 m +4.50 m 36 km/h
58.5 m +4.50 m 36 km/h
58.6 m +4.60 m 36 km/h
58.9 m +4.90 m 37 km/h
59.1 m +5.10 m 38 km/h
59.1 m +5.10 m 38 km/h
60.3 m +6.30 m 42 km/h
RefReference Budget
79.1 m +25.10 m 73 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 49.5% (26.2 m ≈ 5.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 would still be travelling at 42 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
77.36 km/h +1.35 km/h
76.01 km/h Best
75.14 km/h -0.87 km/h
75.02 km/h -0.99 km/h
74.94 km/h -1.07 km/h
74.89 km/h -1.12 km/h
74.81 km/h -1.20 km/h
RefReference All Season
74.52 km/h -1.49 km/h
74.3 km/h -1.71 km/h
74.23 km/h -1.78 km/h
74.13 km/h -1.88 km/h
74.12 km/h -1.89 km/h
74.08 km/h -1.93 km/h
73.75 km/h -2.26 km/h
73.53 km/h -2.48 km/h
73.49 km/h -2.52 km/h
73.49 km/h -2.52 km/h
73.24 km/h -2.77 km/h
73.07 km/h -2.94 km/h
72.94 km/h -3.07 km/h
72.77 km/h -3.24 km/h
71.49 km/h -4.52 km/h
RefReference Budget
62.36 km/h -13.65 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 19.4% (15 Km/H).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
11.64 s -0.62 s
12.26 s Best
12.29 s +0.03 s
RefReference All Season
12.33 s +0.07 s
12.38 s +0.12 s
12.4 s +0.14 s
12.41 s +0.15 s
12.44 s +0.18 s
12.44 s +0.18 s
12.48 s +0.22 s
12.52 s +0.26 s
12.56 s +0.30 s
12.56 s +0.30 s
12.56 s +0.30 s
12.63 s +0.37 s
12.66 s +0.40 s
12.67 s +0.41 s
12.67 s +0.41 s
12.71 s +0.45 s
12.72 s +0.46 s
12.74 s +0.48 s
12.84 s +0.58 s
RefReference Budget
14.57 s +2.31 s

The difference between best and worst was 25.2% (2.93 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
84.5 km/h Best
84.3 km/h -0.20 km/h
83.9 km/h -0.60 km/h
83.4 km/h -1.10 km/h
83.4 km/h -1.10 km/h
82.5 km/h -2.00 km/h
82.2 km/h -2.30 km/h
82 km/h -2.50 km/h
81.1 km/h -3.40 km/h
81 km/h -3.50 km/h
81 km/h -3.50 km/h
80.9 km/h -3.60 km/h
80.7 km/h -3.80 km/h
RefReference Summer
80.4 km/h -4.10 km/h
RefReference All Season
79.8 km/h -4.70 km/h
79.5 km/h -5.00 km/h
78.8 km/h -5.70 km/h
78.5 km/h -6.00 km/h
77.5 km/h -7.00 km/h
75.4 km/h -9.10 km/h
75.3 km/h -9.20 km/h
73 km/h -11.50 km/h
RefReference Budget
66.1 km/h -18.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 21.8% (18.4 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.93 m/sec2 Best
3.82 m/sec2 -0.11 m/sec2
3.71 m/sec2 -0.22 m/sec2
3.64 m/sec2 -0.29 m/sec2
3.61 m/sec2 -0.32 m/sec2
3.58 m/sec2 -0.35 m/sec2
3.58 m/sec2 -0.35 m/sec2
3.48 m/sec2 -0.45 m/sec2
3.46 m/sec2 -0.47 m/sec2
3.42 m/sec2 -0.51 m/sec2
3.4 m/sec2 -0.53 m/sec2
3.28 m/sec2 -0.65 m/sec2
3.2 m/sec2 -0.73 m/sec2
RefReference Summer
3.19 m/sec2 -0.74 m/sec2
3.16 m/sec2 -0.77 m/sec2
3.16 m/sec2 -0.77 m/sec2
3.12 m/sec2 -0.81 m/sec2
RefReference All Season
2.95 m/sec2 -0.98 m/sec2
2.93 m/sec2 -1.00 m/sec2
2.88 m/sec2 -1.05 m/sec2
2.68 m/sec2 -1.25 m/sec2
1.98 m/sec2 -1.95 m/sec2
RefReference Budget
1.23 m/sec2 -2.70 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 68.7% (2.7 m/sec2).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
29.1 m Best 0 km/h
29.1 m Best 0 km/h
29.1 m Best 0 km/h
29.2 m +0.10 m 8 km/h
29.2 m +0.10 m 8 km/h
29.3 m +0.20 m 11 km/h
29.3 m +0.20 m 11 km/h
29.4 m +0.30 m 13 km/h
29.4 m +0.30 m 13 km/h
29.5 m +0.40 m 15 km/h
29.6 m +0.50 m 17 km/h
29.6 m +0.50 m 17 km/h
RefReference All Season
29.7 m +0.60 m 18 km/h
29.7 m +0.60 m 18 km/h
30 m +0.90 m 23 km/h
30.2 m +1.10 m 25 km/h
30.2 m +1.10 m 25 km/h
30.3 m +1.20 m 26 km/h
30.6 m +1.50 m 29 km/h
30.8 m +1.70 m 31 km/h
30.9 m +1.80 m 31 km/h
RefReference Budget
35.8 m +6.70 m 56 km/h
RefReference Summer
46.1 m +17.00 m 79 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 58.4% (17 m ≈ 3.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 would still be travelling at 31 km/h when the Continental WinterContact TS 870 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
2570 N Best
2526 N -44.00 N
2520 N -50.00 N
RefReference All Season
2516 N -54.00 N
2513 N -57.00 N
2512 N -58.00 N
2512 N -58.00 N
2509 N -61.00 N
2491 N -79.00 N
2486 N -84.00 N
2483 N -87.00 N
2483 N -87.00 N
2477 N -93.00 N
2457 N -113.00 N
2452 N -118.00 N
2450 N -120.00 N
2449 N -121.00 N
2446 N -124.00 N
2429 N -141.00 N
2427 N -143.00 N
2271 N -299.00 N
RefReference Budget
1790 N -780.00 N
RefReference Summer
849 N -1,721.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 67% (1,721 N).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
60.9 km/h Best
60.4 km/h -0.50 km/h
60.2 km/h -0.70 km/h
60 km/h -0.90 km/h
60 km/h -0.90 km/h
59.9 km/h -1.00 km/h
59.6 km/h -1.30 km/h
59.6 km/h -1.30 km/h
59.6 km/h -1.30 km/h
RefReference All Season
59.6 km/h -1.30 km/h
59.5 km/h -1.40 km/h
59.4 km/h -1.50 km/h
59.2 km/h -1.70 km/h
59.1 km/h -1.80 km/h
59 km/h -1.90 km/h
59 km/h -1.90 km/h
58.7 km/h -2.20 km/h
58.6 km/h -2.30 km/h
58.5 km/h -2.40 km/h
58 km/h -2.90 km/h
57.5 km/h -3.40 km/h
RefReference Budget
55.9 km/h -5.00 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 8.2% (5 Km/H).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.31 m/sec2 Best
3.31 m/sec2 Best
3.31 m/sec2 Best
3.3 m/sec2 -0.01 m/sec2
3.29 m/sec2 -0.02 m/sec2
3.28 m/sec2 -0.03 m/sec2
3.27 m/sec2 -0.04 m/sec2
3.25 m/sec2 -0.06 m/sec2
3.25 m/sec2 -0.06 m/sec2
3.23 m/sec2 -0.08 m/sec2
3.23 m/sec2 -0.08 m/sec2
3.23 m/sec2 -0.08 m/sec2
3.22 m/sec2 -0.09 m/sec2
3.21 m/sec2 -0.10 m/sec2
3.21 m/sec2 -0.10 m/sec2
RefReference All Season
3.2 m/sec2 -0.11 m/sec2
3.18 m/sec2 -0.13 m/sec2
3.15 m/sec2 -0.16 m/sec2
3.15 m/sec2 -0.16 m/sec2
3.15 m/sec2 -0.16 m/sec2
3.12 m/sec2 -0.19 m/sec2
RefReference Budget
2.71 m/sec2 -0.60 m/sec2
RefReference Summer
1.38 m/sec2 -1.93 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 58.3% (1.93 m/sec2).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
70.3 dB Best
70.8 dB +0.50 dB
70.8 dB +0.50 dB
70.9 dB +0.60 dB
RefReference All Season
71 dB +0.70 dB
71 dB +0.70 dB
71.2 dB +0.90 dB
71.2 dB +0.90 dB
71.4 dB +1.10 dB
71.4 dB +1.10 dB
71.6 dB +1.30 dB
71.6 dB +1.30 dB
71.7 dB +1.40 dB
71.7 dB +1.40 dB
71.8 dB +1.50 dB
72.1 dB +1.80 dB
72.1 dB +1.80 dB
72.2 dB +1.90 dB
72.3 dB +2.00 dB
72.5 dB +2.20 dB
72.9 dB +2.60 dB
RefReference Summer
73.4 dB +3.10 dB
RefReference Budget
74.2 dB +3.90 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (3.9 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
50,500 KM Best
50,250 KM -250 KM
48,690 KM -1,810 KM
48,210 KM -2,290 KM
47,970 KM -2,530 KM
47,500 KM -3,000 KM
45,540 KM -4,960 KM
44,810 KM -5,690 KM
44,300 KM -6,200 KM
41,810 KM -8,690 KM
41,730 KM -8,770 KM
41,330 KM -9,170 KM
40,400 KM -10,100 KM
39,840 KM -10,660 KM
39,500 KM -11,000 KM
38,700 KM -11,800 KM
38,335 KM -12,165 KM
37,400 KM -13,100 KM
37,360 KM -13,140 KM
37,350 KM -13,150 KM

The difference between best and worst was 26% (13,150 KM).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 km
6.64 Price/1000 Best €10.37
7.16 Price/1000 +0.52 Price/1000 €10.15
7.3 Price/1000 +0.66 Price/1000 €14.61
7.47 Price/1000 +0.83 Price/1000 €10.31
7.8 Price/1000 +1.16 Price/1000 €11.20
8.03 Price/1000 +1.39 Price/1000 €14.00
8.1 Price/1000 +1.46 Price/1000 €9.87
8.56 Price/1000 +1.92 Price/1000 €13.11
8.57 Price/1000 +1.93 Price/1000 €16.86
8.61 Price/1000 +1.97 Price/1000 €16.23
8.63 Price/1000 +1.99 Price/1000 €15.13
9.19 Price/1000 +2.55 Price/1000 €15.24
9.26 Price/1000 +2.62 Price/1000 €14.07
9.37 Price/1000 +2.73 Price/1000 €21.34
9.41 Price/1000 +2.77 Price/1000 €13.79
9.59 Price/1000 +2.95 Price/1000 €13.04
10.17 Price/1000 +3.53 Price/1000 €21.00
10.3 Price/1000 +3.66 Price/1000 €14.66
10.85 Price/1000 +4.21 Price/1000 €18.28
11.29 Price/1000 +4.65 Price/1000 €18.27

The difference between best and worst was 70% (4.65 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Barum Polaris 5) works out €459 cheaper than the most expensive (Giti GitiWinterW2).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2024 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.28 kg/t Best £0
7.64 kg/t +0.36 kg/t £22
7.72 kg/t +0.44 kg/t £27
7.82 kg/t +0.54 kg/t £33
7.83 kg/t +0.55 kg/t £33
7.91 kg/t +0.63 kg/t £38
8.01 kg/t +0.73 kg/t £44
8.02 kg/t +0.74 kg/t £45
8.1 kg/t +0.82 kg/t £50
8.2 kg/t +0.92 kg/t £56
8.44 kg/t +1.16 kg/t £70
8.48 kg/t +1.20 kg/t £73
8.61 kg/t +1.33 kg/t £81
8.77 kg/t +1.49 kg/t £90
8.79 kg/t +1.51 kg/t £91
8.83 kg/t +1.55 kg/t £94
8.92 kg/t +1.64 kg/t £99
9.05 kg/t +1.77 kg/t £107
9.75 kg/t +2.47 kg/t £150
10.15 kg/t +2.87 kg/t £174

The difference between best and worst was 39.4% (2.87 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Giti GitiWinterW2 uses about 120 L (£174) more fuel than the Barum Polaris 5.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
100 → 5 km/h
Snow Braking
50 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.