Test Charts / Auto Bild
2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 205/55 R16
- Tyres tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 15
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
38.6 m | -4.40 m | 0 km/h |
| 43 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
RefReference All Season |
43.1 m | +0.10 m | 6 km/h |
| 43.5 m | +0.50 m | 14 km/h | |
| 43.7 m | +0.70 m | 16 km/h | |
| 43.9 m | +0.90 m | 19 km/h | |
| 43.9 m | +0.90 m | 19 km/h | |
| 43.9 m | +0.90 m | 19 km/h | |
| 44 m | +1.00 m | 20 km/h | |
| 44.1 m | +1.10 m | 21 km/h | |
| 44.1 m | +1.10 m | 21 km/h | |
| 44.4 m | +1.40 m | 23 km/h | |
| 44.5 m | +1.50 m | 24 km/h | |
| 44.7 m | +1.70 m | 25 km/h | |
| 45 m | +2.00 m | 27 km/h | |
| 45.1 m | +2.10 m | 28 km/h | |
| 45.2 m | +2.20 m | 29 km/h | |
| 45.2 m | +2.20 m | 29 km/h | |
| 45.5 m | +2.50 m | 30 km/h | |
| 46 m | +3.00 m | 33 km/h | |
| 46.3 m | +3.30 m | 35 km/h | |
| 46.4 m | +3.40 m | 35 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
47.9 m | +4.90 m | 42 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 24.1% (9.3 m ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 would still be travelling at 35 km/h when the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
115 km/h | +4.40 km/h |
RefReference All Season |
112.6 km/h | +2.00 km/h |
| 110.6 km/h | Best | |
| 110.2 km/h | -0.40 km/h | |
| 109.9 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 109.9 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 109.8 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 109.8 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 109.6 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 109.4 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 109.3 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 109.3 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 109.2 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 109.2 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 109.1 km/h | -1.50 km/h | |
| 109 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 109 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 108.9 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 108.8 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 108.8 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 108.3 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 108.2 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
106.3 km/h | -4.30 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (8.7 Km/H).
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (100 - 5 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
52.9 m | -1.10 m | 0 km/h |
| 54 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 54 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
RefReference All Season |
54.7 m | +0.70 m | 15 km/h |
| 55.4 m | +1.40 m | 21 km/h | |
| 55.6 m | +1.60 m | 22 km/h | |
| 56.2 m | +2.20 m | 26 km/h | |
| 56.6 m | +2.60 m | 28 km/h | |
| 56.9 m | +2.90 m | 29 km/h | |
| 57.1 m | +3.10 m | 30 km/h | |
| 57.5 m | +3.50 m | 32 km/h | |
| 57.7 m | +3.70 m | 33 km/h | |
| 57.9 m | +3.90 m | 34 km/h | |
| 57.9 m | +3.90 m | 34 km/h | |
| 58.3 m | +4.30 m | 35 km/h | |
| 58.5 m | +4.50 m | 36 km/h | |
| 58.5 m | +4.50 m | 36 km/h | |
| 58.6 m | +4.60 m | 36 km/h | |
| 58.9 m | +4.90 m | 37 km/h | |
| 59.1 m | +5.10 m | 38 km/h | |
| 59.1 m | +5.10 m | 38 km/h | |
| 60.3 m | +6.30 m | 42 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
79.1 m | +25.10 m | 73 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 49.5% (26.2 m ≈ 5.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 would still be travelling at 42 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
77.36 km/h | +1.35 km/h |
| 76.01 km/h | Best | |
| 75.14 km/h | -0.87 km/h | |
| 75.02 km/h | -0.99 km/h | |
| 74.94 km/h | -1.07 km/h | |
| 74.89 km/h | -1.12 km/h | |
| 74.81 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
RefReference All Season |
74.52 km/h | -1.49 km/h |
| 74.3 km/h | -1.71 km/h | |
| 74.23 km/h | -1.78 km/h | |
| 74.13 km/h | -1.88 km/h | |
| 74.12 km/h | -1.89 km/h | |
| 74.08 km/h | -1.93 km/h | |
| 73.75 km/h | -2.26 km/h | |
| 73.53 km/h | -2.48 km/h | |
| 73.49 km/h | -2.52 km/h | |
| 73.49 km/h | -2.52 km/h | |
| 73.24 km/h | -2.77 km/h | |
| 73.07 km/h | -2.94 km/h | |
| 72.94 km/h | -3.07 km/h | |
| 72.77 km/h | -3.24 km/h | |
| 71.49 km/h | -4.52 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
62.36 km/h | -13.65 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 19.4% (15 Km/H).
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
11.64 s | -0.62 s |
| 12.26 s | Best | |
| 12.29 s | +0.03 s | |
RefReference All Season |
12.33 s | +0.07 s |
| 12.38 s | +0.12 s | |
| 12.4 s | +0.14 s | |
| 12.41 s | +0.15 s | |
| 12.44 s | +0.18 s | |
| 12.44 s | +0.18 s | |
| 12.48 s | +0.22 s | |
| 12.52 s | +0.26 s | |
| 12.56 s | +0.30 s | |
| 12.56 s | +0.30 s | |
| 12.56 s | +0.30 s | |
| 12.63 s | +0.37 s | |
| 12.66 s | +0.40 s | |
| 12.67 s | +0.41 s | |
| 12.67 s | +0.41 s | |
| 12.71 s | +0.45 s | |
| 12.72 s | +0.46 s | |
| 12.74 s | +0.48 s | |
| 12.84 s | +0.58 s | |
RefReference Budget |
14.57 s | +2.31 s |
The difference between best and worst was 25.2% (2.93 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 84.5 km/h | Best | |
| 84.3 km/h | -0.20 km/h | |
| 83.9 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 83.4 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 83.4 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 82.5 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 82.2 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 82 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 81.1 km/h | -3.40 km/h | |
| 81 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 81 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 80.9 km/h | -3.60 km/h | |
| 80.7 km/h | -3.80 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
80.4 km/h | -4.10 km/h |
RefReference All Season |
79.8 km/h | -4.70 km/h |
| 79.5 km/h | -5.00 km/h | |
| 78.8 km/h | -5.70 km/h | |
| 78.5 km/h | -6.00 km/h | |
| 77.5 km/h | -7.00 km/h | |
| 75.4 km/h | -9.10 km/h | |
| 75.3 km/h | -9.20 km/h | |
| 73 km/h | -11.50 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
66.1 km/h | -18.40 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 21.8% (18.4 Km/H).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.93 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.82 m/sec2 | -0.11 m/sec2 | |
| 3.71 m/sec2 | -0.22 m/sec2 | |
| 3.64 m/sec2 | -0.29 m/sec2 | |
| 3.61 m/sec2 | -0.32 m/sec2 | |
| 3.58 m/sec2 | -0.35 m/sec2 | |
| 3.58 m/sec2 | -0.35 m/sec2 | |
| 3.48 m/sec2 | -0.45 m/sec2 | |
| 3.46 m/sec2 | -0.47 m/sec2 | |
| 3.42 m/sec2 | -0.51 m/sec2 | |
| 3.4 m/sec2 | -0.53 m/sec2 | |
| 3.28 m/sec2 | -0.65 m/sec2 | |
| 3.2 m/sec2 | -0.73 m/sec2 | |
RefReference Summer |
3.19 m/sec2 | -0.74 m/sec2 |
| 3.16 m/sec2 | -0.77 m/sec2 | |
| 3.16 m/sec2 | -0.77 m/sec2 | |
| 3.12 m/sec2 | -0.81 m/sec2 | |
RefReference All Season |
2.95 m/sec2 | -0.98 m/sec2 |
| 2.93 m/sec2 | -1.00 m/sec2 | |
| 2.88 m/sec2 | -1.05 m/sec2 | |
| 2.68 m/sec2 | -1.25 m/sec2 | |
| 1.98 m/sec2 | -1.95 m/sec2 | |
RefReference Budget |
1.23 m/sec2 | -2.70 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 68.7% (2.7 m/sec2).
Snow
4Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29.1 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 29.1 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 29.1 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 29.2 m | +0.10 m | 8 km/h | |
| 29.2 m | +0.10 m | 8 km/h | |
| 29.3 m | +0.20 m | 11 km/h | |
| 29.3 m | +0.20 m | 11 km/h | |
| 29.4 m | +0.30 m | 13 km/h | |
| 29.4 m | +0.30 m | 13 km/h | |
| 29.5 m | +0.40 m | 15 km/h | |
| 29.6 m | +0.50 m | 17 km/h | |
| 29.6 m | +0.50 m | 17 km/h | |
RefReference All Season |
29.7 m | +0.60 m | 18 km/h |
| 29.7 m | +0.60 m | 18 km/h | |
| 30 m | +0.90 m | 23 km/h | |
| 30.2 m | +1.10 m | 25 km/h | |
| 30.2 m | +1.10 m | 25 km/h | |
| 30.3 m | +1.20 m | 26 km/h | |
| 30.6 m | +1.50 m | 29 km/h | |
| 30.8 m | +1.70 m | 31 km/h | |
| 30.9 m | +1.80 m | 31 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
35.8 m | +6.70 m | 56 km/h |
RefReference Summer |
46.1 m | +17.00 m | 79 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 58.4% (17 m ≈ 3.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 would still be travelling at 31 km/h when the Continental WinterContact TS 870 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 2570 N | Best | |
| 2526 N | -44.00 N | |
| 2520 N | -50.00 N | |
RefReference All Season |
2516 N | -54.00 N |
| 2513 N | -57.00 N | |
| 2512 N | -58.00 N | |
| 2512 N | -58.00 N | |
| 2509 N | -61.00 N | |
| 2491 N | -79.00 N | |
| 2486 N | -84.00 N | |
| 2483 N | -87.00 N | |
| 2483 N | -87.00 N | |
| 2477 N | -93.00 N | |
| 2457 N | -113.00 N | |
| 2452 N | -118.00 N | |
| 2450 N | -120.00 N | |
| 2449 N | -121.00 N | |
| 2446 N | -124.00 N | |
| 2429 N | -141.00 N | |
| 2427 N | -143.00 N | |
| 2271 N | -299.00 N | |
RefReference Budget |
1790 N | -780.00 N |
RefReference Summer |
849 N | -1,721.00 N |
The difference between best and worst was 67% (1,721 N).
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 60.9 km/h | Best | |
| 60.4 km/h | -0.50 km/h | |
| 60.2 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 60 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 60 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 59.9 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 59.6 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 59.6 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 59.6 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
RefReference All Season |
59.6 km/h | -1.30 km/h |
| 59.5 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 59.4 km/h | -1.50 km/h | |
| 59.2 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 59.1 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 59 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 59 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 58.7 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 58.6 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 58.5 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 58 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
| 57.5 km/h | -3.40 km/h | |
RefReference Budget |
55.9 km/h | -5.00 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 8.2% (5 Km/H).
Snow Slalom
Lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.31 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.31 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.31 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.3 m/sec2 | -0.01 m/sec2 | |
| 3.29 m/sec2 | -0.02 m/sec2 | |
| 3.28 m/sec2 | -0.03 m/sec2 | |
| 3.27 m/sec2 | -0.04 m/sec2 | |
| 3.25 m/sec2 | -0.06 m/sec2 | |
| 3.25 m/sec2 | -0.06 m/sec2 | |
| 3.23 m/sec2 | -0.08 m/sec2 | |
| 3.23 m/sec2 | -0.08 m/sec2 | |
| 3.23 m/sec2 | -0.08 m/sec2 | |
| 3.22 m/sec2 | -0.09 m/sec2 | |
| 3.21 m/sec2 | -0.10 m/sec2 | |
| 3.21 m/sec2 | -0.10 m/sec2 | |
RefReference All Season |
3.2 m/sec2 | -0.11 m/sec2 |
| 3.18 m/sec2 | -0.13 m/sec2 | |
| 3.15 m/sec2 | -0.16 m/sec2 | |
| 3.15 m/sec2 | -0.16 m/sec2 | |
| 3.15 m/sec2 | -0.16 m/sec2 | |
| 3.12 m/sec2 | -0.19 m/sec2 | |
RefReference Budget |
2.71 m/sec2 | -0.60 m/sec2 |
RefReference Summer |
1.38 m/sec2 | -1.93 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 58.3% (1.93 m/sec2).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70.3 dB | Best | |
| 70.8 dB | +0.50 dB | |
| 70.8 dB | +0.50 dB | |
| 70.9 dB | +0.60 dB | |
RefReference All Season |
71 dB | +0.70 dB |
| 71 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 71.4 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 71.4 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +1.90 dB | |
| 72.3 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 72.5 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 72.9 dB | +2.60 dB | |
RefReference Summer |
73.4 dB | +3.10 dB |
RefReference Budget |
74.2 dB | +3.90 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (3.9 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 50,500 KM | Best | |
| 50,250 KM | -250 KM | |
| 48,690 KM | -1,810 KM | |
| 48,210 KM | -2,290 KM | |
| 47,970 KM | -2,530 KM | |
| 47,500 KM | -3,000 KM | |
| 45,540 KM | -4,960 KM | |
| 44,810 KM | -5,690 KM | |
| 44,300 KM | -6,200 KM | |
| 41,810 KM | -8,690 KM | |
| 41,730 KM | -8,770 KM | |
| 41,330 KM | -9,170 KM | |
| 40,400 KM | -10,100 KM | |
| 39,840 KM | -10,660 KM | |
| 39,500 KM | -11,000 KM | |
| 38,700 KM | -11,800 KM | |
| 38,335 KM | -12,165 KM | |
| 37,400 KM | -13,100 KM | |
| 37,360 KM | -13,140 KM | |
| 37,350 KM | -13,150 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 26% (13,150 KM).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 km |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.64 Price/1000 | Best | €10.37 | |
| 7.16 Price/1000 | +0.52 Price/1000 | €10.15 | |
| 7.3 Price/1000 | +0.66 Price/1000 | €14.61 | |
| 7.47 Price/1000 | +0.83 Price/1000 | €10.31 | |
| 7.8 Price/1000 | +1.16 Price/1000 | €11.20 | |
| 8.03 Price/1000 | +1.39 Price/1000 | €14.00 | |
| 8.1 Price/1000 | +1.46 Price/1000 | €9.87 | |
| 8.56 Price/1000 | +1.92 Price/1000 | €13.11 | |
| 8.57 Price/1000 | +1.93 Price/1000 | €16.86 | |
| 8.61 Price/1000 | +1.97 Price/1000 | €16.23 | |
| 8.63 Price/1000 | +1.99 Price/1000 | €15.13 | |
| 9.19 Price/1000 | +2.55 Price/1000 | €15.24 | |
| 9.26 Price/1000 | +2.62 Price/1000 | €14.07 | |
| 9.37 Price/1000 | +2.73 Price/1000 | €21.34 | |
| 9.41 Price/1000 | +2.77 Price/1000 | €13.79 | |
| 9.59 Price/1000 | +2.95 Price/1000 | €13.04 | |
| 10.17 Price/1000 | +3.53 Price/1000 | €21.00 | |
| 10.3 Price/1000 | +3.66 Price/1000 | €14.66 | |
| 10.85 Price/1000 | +4.21 Price/1000 | €18.28 | |
| 11.29 Price/1000 | +4.65 Price/1000 | €18.27 |
The difference between best and worst was 70% (4.65 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Barum Polaris 5) works out €459 cheaper than the most expensive (Giti GitiWinterW2).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2024 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.28 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 7.64 kg/t | +0.36 kg/t | £22 | |
| 7.72 kg/t | +0.44 kg/t | £27 | |
| 7.82 kg/t | +0.54 kg/t | £33 | |
| 7.83 kg/t | +0.55 kg/t | £33 | |
| 7.91 kg/t | +0.63 kg/t | £38 | |
| 8.01 kg/t | +0.73 kg/t | £44 | |
| 8.02 kg/t | +0.74 kg/t | £45 | |
| 8.1 kg/t | +0.82 kg/t | £50 | |
| 8.2 kg/t | +0.92 kg/t | £56 | |
| 8.44 kg/t | +1.16 kg/t | £70 | |
| 8.48 kg/t | +1.20 kg/t | £73 | |
| 8.61 kg/t | +1.33 kg/t | £81 | |
| 8.77 kg/t | +1.49 kg/t | £90 | |
| 8.79 kg/t | +1.51 kg/t | £91 | |
| 8.83 kg/t | +1.55 kg/t | £94 | |
| 8.92 kg/t | +1.64 kg/t | £99 | |
| 9.05 kg/t | +1.77 kg/t | £107 | |
| 9.75 kg/t | +2.47 kg/t | £150 | |
| 10.15 kg/t | +2.87 kg/t | £174 |
The difference between best and worst was 39.4% (2.87 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Giti GitiWinterW2 uses about 120 L (£174) more fuel than the Barum Polaris 5.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 100 → 5 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 50 → 0 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test
205/55 R1655 tyres tested
19 of these 20 tyres tested again
2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test
225/45 R1854 tyres tested
12 of these 20 tyres tested again
2025 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 52 Sets!
225/40 R1851 tyres tested
11 of these 20 tyres tested again

