Menu

Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Ceat WinterDrive

This head-to-head puts Bridgestone's Blizzak 6, a premium winter touring tyre with a sporty edge, against the value-driven Ceat WinterDrive. Across four shared tests in 205/55 R16 and 225/40 R18, the Blizzak 6 consistently finishes near the top (including an outright win in a 55-tyre braking test), while the Ceat typically lands mid-pack.
The pattern is clear: Bridgestone dominates in wet and balanced winter capability, adding precise handling and low rolling resistance. Ceat counters with standout purchase price, very competitive mileage, quieter road manners, and a few niche wins (shorter dry stops in two tests, stronger ice braking in ADAC, and better snow traction in select metrics).
Blizzak-6 VS WinterDrive

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of four total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6four
four wins

While it might look like the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 is better than the Ceat WinterDrive purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Class-leading wet braking and aquaplaning resistance (e.g., −5-11% wet braking vs Ceat across tests)
  • Consistently strong snow braking and handling with precise steering feel
  • Lower rolling resistance with competitive wear (53-57k km projections)
  • Sporty dry handling and balanced control across conditions
  • Outstanding value and cost-per-km (circa €380/set; best value score)
  • Very competitive mileage and low fuel use in ADAC
  • Quieter pass-by noise and strong ice braking in ADAC
  • Occasional wins in dry braking and solid snow traction

Dry Braking

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive stopped the vehicle in 3.61% less distance than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
44.35M
Ceat WinterDrive
42.75M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Ceat WinterDrive

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
43.8M (+1.8M)
Ceat WinterDrive
42M
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
44.9M (+1.4M)
Ceat WinterDrive
43.5M

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was 1.88% faster around a lap than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
116.9Km/H
Ceat WinterDrive
114.7Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
116.9Km/H
Ceat WinterDrive
114.7Km/H (-2.2Km/H)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 stopped the vehicle in 6.85% less distance than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
39.15M
Ceat WinterDrive
42.03M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
34.6M
Ceat WinterDrive
39M (+4.4M)
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
32.3M
Ceat WinterDrive
34.5M (+2.2M)
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
35M
Ceat WinterDrive
36.9M (+1.9M)
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
54.7M
Ceat WinterDrive
57.7M (+3M)

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 stopped the vehicle in 8.06% less distance than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
36.5M
Ceat WinterDrive
39.7M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
36.5M
Ceat WinterDrive
39.7M (+3.2M)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was 1.6% faster around a wet lap than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81.1Km/H
Ceat WinterDrive
79.8Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81.1Km/H
Ceat WinterDrive
79.8Km/H (-1.3Km/H)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was 1.81% faster around a wet circle than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
12.46s
Ceat WinterDrive
12.69s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
12.46s
Ceat WinterDrive
12.69s (+0.23s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 floated at a 5.22% higher speed than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75.65Km/H
Ceat WinterDrive
71.7Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74.9Km/H
Ceat WinterDrive
71.5Km/H (-3.4Km/H)
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
76.4Km/H
Ceat WinterDrive
71.9Km/H (-4.5Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 slipped out at a 15.92% higher speed than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
2.45m/sec2
Ceat WinterDrive
2.06m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
2.45m/sec2
Ceat WinterDrive
2.06m/sec2 (-0.39m/sec2)

Snow Braking

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during four snow braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 stopped the vehicle in 1.16% less distance than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23.8M
Ceat WinterDrive
24.08M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
29.6M
Ceat WinterDrive
30.2M (+0.6M)
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
9.6M
Ceat WinterDrive
9.7M (+0.1M)
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28M
Ceat WinterDrive
28.2M (+0.2M)
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28M
Ceat WinterDrive
28.2M (+0.2M)

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive had 2.51% better snow traction than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
1361N
Ceat WinterDrive
1396N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Ceat WinterDrive

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
239N (-6N)
Ceat WinterDrive
245N
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
2483N (-64N)
Ceat WinterDrive
2547N

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was 1.02% faster around a lap than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
58.6Km/H
Ceat WinterDrive
58Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
58.6Km/H
Ceat WinterDrive
58Km/H (-0.6Km/H)

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was 1.73% faster through a slalom than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
2.89m/sec2
Ceat WinterDrive
2.84m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
2.89m/sec2
Ceat WinterDrive
2.84m/sec2 (-0.05m/sec2)

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive stopped the vehicle 4.32% shorter than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
16.2M
Ceat WinterDrive
15.5M
Ice braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Ice Braking: Ceat WinterDrive

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
16.2M (+0.7M)
Ceat WinterDrive
15.5M

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 and Ceat WinterDrive performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
7.3 Points
Ceat WinterDrive
7.3 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tyres performed equally well

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
7.3 Points
Ceat WinterDrive
7.3 Points

Noise

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during two noise tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive measured 1.51% quieter than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
69.6dB
Ceat WinterDrive
68.55dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Ceat WinterDrive

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72.4dB (+0.8dB)
Ceat WinterDrive
71.6dB
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66.8dB (+1.3dB)
Ceat WinterDrive
65.5dB

Wear

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one wear tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive is predicted to cover 5.01% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
55350KM
Ceat WinterDrive
58270KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Ceat WinterDrive

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
57700KM (-6900KM)
Ceat WinterDrive
64600KM
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
53000KM
Ceat WinterDrive
51940KM (-1060KM)

Value

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one value tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive proved to have a 35.34% better value based on price/1000km than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
11.32Price/1000
Ceat WinterDrive
7.32Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Ceat WinterDrive

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
11.32Price/1000 (+4Price/1000)
Ceat WinterDrive
7.32Price/1000

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 had a 5.84% lower rolling resistance than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
8.54kg / t
Ceat WinterDrive
9.07kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
8.54kg / t
Ceat WinterDrive
9.07kg / t (+0.53kg / t)

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 and Ceat WinterDrive performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
5.8l/100km
Ceat WinterDrive
5.8l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tyres performed equally well

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
5.8l/100km
Ceat WinterDrive
5.8l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 emitted 3.13% less particle wear matter than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
62mg/km/t
Ceat WinterDrive
64mg/km/t
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
62mg/km/t
Ceat WinterDrive
64mg/km/t (+2mg/km/t)

Real World Driver Reviews

Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 and Ceat WinterDrive.

In total the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has been reviewed 5 times and drivers have given the tyre 92% overall.

The Ceat WinterDrive has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tyre 0% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.

Best Review for the Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Given 96% 215/55 R17 on mostly motorways for 10,000 miles
Best winter tire I've ever used
Helpful 960 - tyre reviewed on October 30, 2024
View all Bridgestone Blizzak 6 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Ceat WinterDrive
View all Ceat WinterDrive driver reviews >>

Conclusion

If you prioritise all-weather safety with an emphasis on wet security and confident winter control, the Blizzak 6 is the stronger, more rounded performer. It wins every shared wet and snow braking head-to-head, posts better aquaplaning resistance, and feels sharper to steer-translating to shorter stops and easier control when conditions deteriorate.
The Ceat WinterDrive delivers excellent value: a much lower buy-in, very competitive projected mileage, lower noise, and isolated strengths in dry stopping and ice braking. For budget-minded drivers in milder climates or well-cleared urban routes who still want solid winter capability, it's a pragmatic pick.
Bottom line: choose Bridgestone for best-in-class wet confidence and balanced winter prowess; choose Ceat for maximum cost-per-kilometre savings and quieter cruising, accepting weaker wet-handling reserves.
Key Differences
  • Overall results: Bridgestone finishes 1st/55, 3rd/31, 3rd/22, 6th/52 vs Ceat's 10th/31, 15th/22, 19th/52, 24th/55
  • Wet safety: Blizzak 6 wins all shared wet braking tests (≈5-11% shorter) and leads wet circle/handling and aquaplaning
  • Snow control: Blizzak 6 leads snow braking/handling; Ceat edges snow traction in select tests
  • Ice performance: Ceat posts shorter ice braking in ADAC; Bridgestone close but behind there
  • Dry behaviour: Ceat occasionally shorter dry stops; Bridgestone superior dry handling precision
  • Running costs: Ceat markedly cheaper purchase price and low noise; Bridgestone lower rolling resistance; wear advantage varies by test
Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Overall Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.