Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Ceat WinterDrive
The pattern is clear: Bridgestone dominates in wet and balanced winter capability, adding precise handling and low rolling resistance. Ceat counters with standout purchase price, very competitive mileage, quieter road manners, and a few niche wins (shorter dry stops in two tests, stronger ice braking in ADAC, and better snow traction in select metrics).

Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 | four |
While it might look like the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 is better than the Ceat WinterDrive purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Class-leading wet braking and aquaplaning resistance (e.g., −5-11% wet braking vs Ceat across tests)
- Consistently strong snow braking and handling with precise steering feel
- Lower rolling resistance with competitive wear (53-57k km projections)
- Sporty dry handling and balanced control across conditions
- Outstanding value and cost-per-km (circa €380/set; best value score)
- Very competitive mileage and low fuel use in ADAC
- Quieter pass-by noise and strong ice braking in ADAC
- Occasional wins in dry braking and solid snow traction
Dry Braking
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive stopped the vehicle in 3.61% less distance than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Dry Braking: Ceat WinterDrive
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was 1.88% faster around a lap than the Ceat WinterDrive.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 stopped the vehicle in 6.85% less distance than the Ceat WinterDrive.
Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 stopped the vehicle in 8.06% less distance than the Ceat WinterDrive.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was 1.6% faster around a wet lap than the Ceat WinterDrive.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was 1.81% faster around a wet circle than the Ceat WinterDrive.
Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 floated at a 5.22% higher speed than the Ceat WinterDrive.
Best In Straight Aqua: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 slipped out at a 15.92% higher speed than the Ceat WinterDrive.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during four snow braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 stopped the vehicle in 1.16% less distance than the Ceat WinterDrive.
Best In Snow Braking: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive had 2.51% better snow traction than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Snow Traction: Ceat WinterDrive
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was 1.02% faster around a lap than the Ceat WinterDrive.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was 1.73% faster through a slalom than the Ceat WinterDrive.
Best In Snow Slalom: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive stopped the vehicle 4.32% shorter than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Ice Braking: Ceat WinterDrive
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 and Ceat WinterDrive performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during two noise tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive measured 1.51% quieter than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Noise: Ceat WinterDrive
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one wear tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive is predicted to cover 5.01% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Wear: Ceat WinterDrive
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one value tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive proved to have a 35.34% better value based on price/1000km than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Value: Ceat WinterDrive
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 had a 5.84% lower rolling resistance than the Ceat WinterDrive.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 and Ceat WinterDrive performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 emitted 3.13% less particle wear matter than the Ceat WinterDrive.
Best In Abrasion: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 and Ceat WinterDrive.
In total the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has been reviewed 5 times and drivers have given the tyre 92% overall.
The Ceat WinterDrive has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tyre 0% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
View all Ceat WinterDrive driver reviews >>
Conclusion
The Ceat WinterDrive delivers excellent value: a much lower buy-in, very competitive projected mileage, lower noise, and isolated strengths in dry stopping and ice braking. For budget-minded drivers in milder climates or well-cleared urban routes who still want solid winter capability, it's a pragmatic pick.
Bottom line: choose Bridgestone for best-in-class wet confidence and balanced winter prowess; choose Ceat for maximum cost-per-kilometre savings and quieter cruising, accepting weaker wet-handling reserves.
Key Differences
- Overall results: Bridgestone finishes 1st/55, 3rd/31, 3rd/22, 6th/52 vs Ceat's 10th/31, 15th/22, 19th/52, 24th/55
- Wet safety: Blizzak 6 wins all shared wet braking tests (≈5-11% shorter) and leads wet circle/handling and aquaplaning
- Snow control: Blizzak 6 leads snow braking/handling; Ceat edges snow traction in select tests
- Ice performance: Ceat posts shorter ice braking in ADAC; Bridgestone close but behind there
- Dry behaviour: Ceat occasionally shorter dry stops; Bridgestone superior dry handling precision
- Running costs: Ceat markedly cheaper purchase price and low noise; Bridgestone lower rolling resistance; wear advantage varies by test
Overall Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.