Menu

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129

This is a head-to-head between two max-performance summer tyres that target fast-road grip but with different “personalities” in testing: the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport often leans into steering feel and driver confidence, while the Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 more consistently posts strong objective safety-and-running-cost numbers (especially in wet braking and rolling resistance).

Across four shared comparative tests (235/35 R19, 255/35 R19, and 295/30 R20 fitments), the Hankook finishes ahead more often overall (including a 2nd vs 3rd in Sport Auto 2022), but the Goodyear has moments where it feels like the more enthusiast-oriented tool-particularly in dry handling/subjective scores in the Tyre Reviews-style 2026 performance test. The interesting twist is that results swing with fitment and test format, so the “better tyre” depends heavily on whether you prioritise wet stopping, efficiency and noise, or steering fidelity and subjective control at the limit.
Eagle-F1-SuperSport VS Ventus-S1-Evo-Z-K129

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of four total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSportone
one wins
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129three
three wins

While it might look like the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 is better than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Stronger steering feel and subjective handling satisfaction when the setup suits it (e.g., 8.25 vs 7.75 subjective dry; 8.0 vs 7.75 subjective wet in the 2026 performance test)
  • Competitive lap-style handling results in some tests (wins dry handling 2/4 and wet handling in the 2026 performance test: 102.7 s vs 105.19 s)
  • Comfort is repeatedly praised for the category (wins comfort and noise in the 2026 performance test: 7.25 vs 6.75; 72.4 dB vs 73.3 dB)
  • Can be strong in aquaplaning in certain datasets (wins straight aquaplaning in Autobild 2026: 88.3 vs 87.9 km/h)
  • More consistent wet-safety performance, especially wet braking (wins 3/4; up to ~10.7-12.4% shorter wet stops in 2026 Autobild and the 2024 sports car test)
  • Stronger efficiency and lower rolling resistance in every shared test (e.g., 8.29 vs 10.31 kg/t in Autobild 2026; 8.55 vs 9.76 kg/t in 2024)
  • Frequent aquaplaning wins and good high-speed wet stability (wins straight aquaplaning in 3/4 tests; plus curved aquaplaning win in Sport Auto 2022)
  • Typically quieter and better value positioning (wins noise 3/4; cheaper in Sport Auto 2022: 182 vs 191)

Dry Braking

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 stopped the vehicle in 0.6% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
36.4M
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
36.18M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
35.5M
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
35.7M (+0.2M)
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
39.7M
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
39.7M
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
34.18M (+0.25M)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
33.93M
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
36.2M (+0.8M)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
35.4M

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was 0.62% faster around a lap than the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
78.66s
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
79.15s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
78.66s
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
79.15s (+0.49s)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was 0.61% faster around a lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
114.2Km/H
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
114.9Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
130.4Km/H (-0.8Km/H)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
131.2Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
109.1Km/H
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
106.6Km/H (-2.5Km/H)
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
103.1Km/H (-3.8Km/H)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
106.9Km/H

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scored 6.06% more points than the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
8.25 Points
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
7.75 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
8.25 Points
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
7.75 Points (-0.5 Points)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 stopped the vehicle in 7.87% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
42.31M
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
38.98M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
33.5M
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
34M (+0.5M)
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
57.3M (+7.1M)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
50.2M
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
26.95M (+1.24M)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
25.71M
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
51.5M (+5.5M)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
46M

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was 2.37% faster around a wet lap than the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
102.7s
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
105.19s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
102.7s
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
105.19s (+2.49s)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was 3.11% faster around a wet lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
75.7Km/H
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
78.13Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
87.7Km/H (-0.2Km/H)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
87.9Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
75.9Km/H (-0.2Km/H)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
76.1Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
63.5Km/H (-6.9Km/H)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
70.4Km/H

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scored 3.13% more points than the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
8 Points
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
7.75 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
8 Points
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
7.75 Points (-0.25 Points)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was 3.77% faster around a wet circle than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
13.28s
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
12.78s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
11.66s (+0.1s)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
11.56s
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
14.9s (+0.9s)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
14s

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 floated at a 0.92% higher speed than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
82.93Km/H
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
83.7Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
68.7Km/H (-0.5Km/H)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
69.2Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
97.1Km/H (-2.4Km/H)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
99.5Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
77.6Km/H (-0.6Km/H)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
78.2Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
88.3Km/H
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
87.9Km/H (-0.4Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 slipped out at a 4.35% higher speed than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
2.2m/sec2
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
2.3m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
2.2m/sec2 (-0.1m/sec2)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
2.3m/sec2

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 scored 1.36% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
7.28 Points
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
7.38 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
7.25 Points
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
6.75 Points (-0.5 Points)
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
7.3 Points (-0.7 Points)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
8 Points

Noise

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during three noise tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 measured 1.08% quieter than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
72.33dB
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
71.55dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
68.8dB (+0.7dB)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
68.1dB
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
73.9dB (+1.1dB)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
72.8dB
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
72.4dB
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
73.3dB (+0.9dB)
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
74.2dB (+2.2dB)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
72dB

Price

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during one price tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 cost 4.71% less than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
191
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
182
Price in local currency, lower is better

Best In Price: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
191 (+9)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
182

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 had a 10.03% lower rolling resistance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
10.07kg / t
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
9.06kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
9.8kg / t (+0.3kg / t)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
9.5kg / t
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
9.76kg / t (+1.21kg / t)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
8.55kg / t
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
10.4kg / t (+0.5kg / t)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
9.9kg / t
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
10.31kg / t (+2.02kg / t)
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
8.29kg / t

Real World Driver Reviews

Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport and Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129.

In total the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport has been reviewed 62 times and drivers have given the tyre 84% overall.

The Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 has been reviewed 4 times and drivers have given the tyre 80% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.

Best Review for the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Given 92% 235/40 R18 W on mostly country roads for 1,000 spirited miles
One word: fantastic! Truly a Michelin PS4s competitor!

Tyres I already drove on my 322hp Megane RS: PS4, PS4s, PS3, Nokian Powerproof and now the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport in 235/40/18.

Dry grip and feedback is great! Full throttle out of the corner is easy (works great with some added negative camber). It gives you so much confidence. The feedback is superb and now I really can push the car to its limits. I think they behave the same as the PS4s but it is difficult to compare because I've changed the suspension this year.

These Goodyears are a... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1231 - tyre reviewed on April 6, 2019
View all Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
Given 90% 245/40 R21 on mostly country roads for 4,000 spirited miles
much better than the continentals that came with the car, cheaper than michelin pilot sport 4
Helpful 1103 - tyre reviewed on December 11, 2022
View all Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

On balance, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 is the more consistently convincing all-rounder in these shared results: it wins 3 of 4 overall comparisons and dominates the measurable day-to-day metrics-rolling resistance (4/4 tests), noise (3/4), and wet braking (3/4). The size of the wet-braking gap is sometimes meaningful rather than marginal: in Autobild 2026 it stops in 46.0 m vs the Goodyear's 51.5 m from 100 km/h (~10.7% shorter), and in the 2024 sports car test it's 50.2 m vs 57.3 m (~12.4% shorter). Add frequent aquaplaning wins and typically better efficiency, and the Hankook makes a strong case for high-speed wet motorway safety and lower running costs.

The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport's best argument is “how it drives” when the pairing is right. In the 2026 performance summer test it's quicker in wet handling (102.7 s vs 105.19 s) and dry handling (78.66 s vs 79.15 s) with stronger subjective scores (dry: 8.25 vs 7.75; wet: 8.0 vs 7.75), and it's repeatedly described as unusually comfortable for a tyre in this class. However, it's also repeatedly flagged for high rolling resistance and, in some tests/sizes, disappointing wet braking and even balance issues-Autobild 2026 in particular paints a worst-case scenario (last overall) that's noted as likely a fitment mismatch rather than a universal verdict.

Practical takeaway: if you want the safer, quieter, more efficient choice that most often delivers in objective wet metrics, pick the Hankook. If you value steering feel, subjective confidence and comfort and you're buying in a fitment where it has a good reputation/track record, the Goodyear can still be a rewarding enthusiast tyre-but it's harder to recommend blind because the downside (especially efficiency and occasional wet stopping gaps) can be significant.
Key Differences
  • Wet braking is the clearest separator: Hankook leads in 3/4 tests and sometimes by large margins (Autobild 2026: 46.0 m vs 51.5 m; 2024: 50.2 m vs 57.3 m), while Goodyear only edges it in Sport Auto 2022 (33.5 m vs 34.0 m).
  • Efficiency/running costs strongly favour Hankook: it wins rolling resistance in all four shared tests, including a huge gap in Autobild 2026 (8.29 vs 10.31 kg/t, ~19.6%).
  • Subjective 'driver enjoyment' tends to favour Goodyear when it's on song: better subjective dry and wet handling scores in the 2026 performance test, and praised for reassuring wet handling feel.
  • Dry handling results are split: Goodyear wins in the 2026 performance test (78.66 s vs 79.15 s) and 2024 (109.1 vs 106.6 km/h), but Hankook wins in Autobild 2026 (106.9 vs 103.1 km/h) and Sport Auto 2022 (131.2 vs 130.4 km/h).
  • Aquaplaning is generally a Hankook advantage (wins straight aqua 3/4 and curved aqua in 2022), but Goodyear can match or beat it in specific cases (straight aqua win in Autobild 2026 by 0.46%).
  • Fitment sensitivity/consistency differs: Goodyear shows bigger swings (from 3/10 in 2022 to last in Autobild 2026 with comments about imbalance), while Hankook is more predictably mid-to-upper midfield with fewer extreme outlier outcomes.
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129

Overall Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:

Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.