Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
Across four shared comparative tests (235/35 R19, 255/35 R19, and 295/30 R20 fitments), the Hankook finishes ahead more often overall (including a 2nd vs 3rd in Sport Auto 2022), but the Goodyear has moments where it feels like the more enthusiast-oriented tool-particularly in dry handling/subjective scores in the Tyre Reviews-style 2026 performance test. The interesting twist is that results swing with fitment and test format, so the “better tyre” depends heavily on whether you prioritise wet stopping, efficiency and noise, or steering fidelity and subjective control at the limit.

Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport | one | |
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 | three |
While it might look like the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 is better than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Stronger steering feel and subjective handling satisfaction when the setup suits it (e.g., 8.25 vs 7.75 subjective dry; 8.0 vs 7.75 subjective wet in the 2026 performance test)
- Competitive lap-style handling results in some tests (wins dry handling 2/4 and wet handling in the 2026 performance test: 102.7 s vs 105.19 s)
- Comfort is repeatedly praised for the category (wins comfort and noise in the 2026 performance test: 7.25 vs 6.75; 72.4 dB vs 73.3 dB)
- Can be strong in aquaplaning in certain datasets (wins straight aquaplaning in Autobild 2026: 88.3 vs 87.9 km/h)
- More consistent wet-safety performance, especially wet braking (wins 3/4; up to ~10.7-12.4% shorter wet stops in 2026 Autobild and the 2024 sports car test)
- Stronger efficiency and lower rolling resistance in every shared test (e.g., 8.29 vs 10.31 kg/t in Autobild 2026; 8.55 vs 9.76 kg/t in 2024)
- Frequent aquaplaning wins and good high-speed wet stability (wins straight aquaplaning in 3/4 tests; plus curved aquaplaning win in Sport Auto 2022)
- Typically quieter and better value positioning (wins noise 3/4; cheaper in Sport Auto 2022: 182 vs 191)
Dry Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 stopped the vehicle in 0.6% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Dry Braking: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was 0.62% faster around a lap than the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was 0.61% faster around a lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scored 6.06% more points than the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 stopped the vehicle in 7.87% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was 2.37% faster around a wet lap than the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was 3.11% faster around a wet lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scored 3.13% more points than the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was 3.77% faster around a wet circle than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Wet Circle: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 floated at a 0.92% higher speed than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Straight Aqua: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 slipped out at a 4.35% higher speed than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 scored 1.36% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during three noise tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 measured 1.08% quieter than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Noise: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during one price tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 cost 4.71% less than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Price: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 had a 10.03% lower rolling resistance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport and Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129.
In total the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport has been reviewed 62 times and drivers have given the tyre 84% overall.
The Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 has been reviewed 4 times and drivers have given the tyre 80% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Tyres I already drove on my 322hp Megane RS: PS4, PS4s, PS3, Nokian Powerproof and now the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport in 235/40/18.
Dry grip and feedback is great! Full throttle out of the corner is easy (works great with some added negative camber). It gives you so much confidence. The feedback is superb and now I really can push the car to its limits. I think they behave the same as the PS4s but it is difficult to compare because I've changed the suspension this year.
These Goodyears are a... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport's best argument is “how it drives” when the pairing is right. In the 2026 performance summer test it's quicker in wet handling (102.7 s vs 105.19 s) and dry handling (78.66 s vs 79.15 s) with stronger subjective scores (dry: 8.25 vs 7.75; wet: 8.0 vs 7.75), and it's repeatedly described as unusually comfortable for a tyre in this class. However, it's also repeatedly flagged for high rolling resistance and, in some tests/sizes, disappointing wet braking and even balance issues-Autobild 2026 in particular paints a worst-case scenario (last overall) that's noted as likely a fitment mismatch rather than a universal verdict.
Practical takeaway: if you want the safer, quieter, more efficient choice that most often delivers in objective wet metrics, pick the Hankook. If you value steering feel, subjective confidence and comfort and you're buying in a fitment where it has a good reputation/track record, the Goodyear can still be a rewarding enthusiast tyre-but it's harder to recommend blind because the downside (especially efficiency and occasional wet stopping gaps) can be significant.
Key Differences
- Wet braking is the clearest separator: Hankook leads in 3/4 tests and sometimes by large margins (Autobild 2026: 46.0 m vs 51.5 m; 2024: 50.2 m vs 57.3 m), while Goodyear only edges it in Sport Auto 2022 (33.5 m vs 34.0 m).
- Efficiency/running costs strongly favour Hankook: it wins rolling resistance in all four shared tests, including a huge gap in Autobild 2026 (8.29 vs 10.31 kg/t, ~19.6%).
- Subjective 'driver enjoyment' tends to favour Goodyear when it's on song: better subjective dry and wet handling scores in the 2026 performance test, and praised for reassuring wet handling feel.
- Dry handling results are split: Goodyear wins in the 2026 performance test (78.66 s vs 79.15 s) and 2024 (109.1 vs 106.6 km/h), but Hankook wins in Autobild 2026 (106.9 vs 103.1 km/h) and Sport Auto 2022 (131.2 vs 130.4 km/h).
- Aquaplaning is generally a Hankook advantage (wins straight aqua 3/4 and curved aqua in 2022), but Goodyear can match or beat it in specific cases (straight aqua win in Autobild 2026 by 0.46%).
- Fitment sensitivity/consistency differs: Goodyear shows bigger swings (from 3/10 in 2022 to last in Autobild 2026 with comments about imbalance), while Hankook is more predictably mid-to-upper midfield with fewer extreme outlier outcomes.
Overall Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo Z K129 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tyre.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.
Discussion
- No comments yet — be the first.