Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
- TR Score
- 8.9/10
- Owners say
- 84% · 66
- TR Score
- 9.4/10
- Owners say
- 85% · 180
In the 13 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S finished ahead 11 times and the Eagle F1 SuperSport twice. The Pilot Sport 4 S had 8% lower rolling resistance.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S for the best real-world performance-car tyre: superior wet braking safety, lower noise, and better efficiency with consistently strong test results. Choose the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport if your priority is maximum steering immediacy and exploitable limit balance for spirited driving/occasional track use-and you're buying a proven size/fitment for your specific car, as its performance swing can be larger than the Michelin's.
Where the Eagle F1 SuperSport is stronger
- Sharper, more engaging steering/limit balance in multiple tests (often strong subjective dry & wet handling scores, e.g., EVO 2025: 66 vs 56 subjective dry)
- Can be very fast in handling disciplines when the fitment suits it (e.g., EVO 2025 dry handling 66.88 s vs 67.96 s; Tyre Reviews 2022 dry handling win 52.18 s vs 52.5 s)
- Frequently strong aquaplaning resistance (multiple straight/curved aquaplaning wins across tests)
Where the Pilot Sport 4 S is stronger
- Best-in-class wet braking consistency (wins 11-1; often several metres shorter, e.g., 47.3 m vs 51.5 m in AutoBild Sports Cars 2026)
- More consistent all-round test finishing and overall victories (11 test wins vs 2), with fewer “bad days” across sizes
- Better refinement: typically quieter and more comfortable (noise wins 8-1; comfort advantages in Tyre Reviews 2022: 9.5 vs 8.5)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Pilot Sport 4 S at a glance
| Category | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Gap | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won13 shared tests | 2 | 11 | |
| Dry30 measurements | 9 | The Pilot Sport 4 S stopped 2.4% shorter in the dry (12 tests) | 21 |
| Wet51 measurements | 20 | The Pilot Sport 4 S stopped 4.4% shorter in the wet (12 tests) | 31 |
| Comfort17 measurements | 2 | The Pilot Sport 4 S was 1.3 dB quieter (9 tests) | 13 |
| Value12 measurements | 1 | The Pilot Sport 4 S had 8% lower rolling resistance (12 tests) | 11 |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.9/10 | The Pilot Sport 4 S by 0.5 | 9.4/10 |
| Owner rating66 and 180 reviews | 84% | Too close to call | 85% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 81% | Too close to call | 80% |
| Pricein the 7 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The Pilot Sport 4 S was dearer in 6 of 7 | +9.8% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 75 | 60 sizes made in both | 105 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 13 tests, 2019 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Field | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tyre Test | P8 of 8 | P5 of 8 | |
| 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test | P8 of 10 | P1 of 10 | |
| 2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test | P2 of 9 | P5 of 9 | |
| 2025 Autobild Sports Cars UUHP Tyre Test | P3 of 7 | P2 of 7 | |
| 2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test | P3 of 7 | P2 of 7 | |
| 2024 Sports Car Tyre Test | P6 of 7 | P2 of 7 | |
| 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | P4 of 10 | P2 of 10 | |
| 2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | P3 of 14 | P1 of 14 | |
| 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | P4 of 9 | P3 of 9 | |
| 2020 EVO UHP Summer Tyre Test | P5 of 7 | P1 of 7 | |
| 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test | P2 of 10 | P1 of 10 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | P3 of 10 | P1 of 10 | |
| 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | P1 of 8 | P2 of 8 |
Performance profile
15 measurements from the 13 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Eagle F1 SuperSport
Pilot Sport 4 S
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 3 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Eagle F1 SuperSport
Not ahead in any category
Pilot Sport 4 S
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Eagle F1 SuperSport
Pilot Sport 4 S
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Eagle F1 SuperSport 84% from 66 reviews and the Pilot Sport 4 S 85% from 180. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Gap | Pilot Sport 4 S | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35.14 | 2.4% | 34.3 | 2-10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 71.11 | 0.4% | 71.46 | 4-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 111.5 | 1.4% | 113 | 0-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 4.9% | scored | 3-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 8.1% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 43.51 | 4.4% | 41.42 | 1-11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70.73 | = | 70.62 | 3-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 77.03 | 1.5% | 77.9 | 3-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 7.5% | scored | 4-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.03 | 1.3% | 6.94 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.5 | 2.3% | 12.21 | 0-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 82.76 | 0.6% | 83.24 | 5-7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 18.19 | 0.3% | 17.68 | 3-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 9.4% | scored | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 2.1% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 73.71 | 1.3 dB | 72.41 | 1-8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 27.01 | 0.8% | 27.57 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.88 | 8% | 8.12 | 1-11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 8.9 and the Pilot Sport 4 S 9.4 out of 10.
| Eagle F1 SuperSport | Category | Pilot Sport 4 S | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 94 | Dry | 97 | ||
| 83 | Wet | 89 | ||
| 14 | Comfort | 44 | ||
| 4 | Value | 32 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Eagle F1 SuperSport | Category | Pilot Sport 4 S | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.5 | Dry Grip | 9.2 | ||
| 8.1 | Wet Grip | 8.7 | ||
| 9.1 | Road Feedback | 8.4 | ||
| 9.1 | Handling | 8.6 | ||
| 7.2 | Wear | 8 | ||
| 7.3 | Comfort | 8.4 | ||
Owners rate the Eagle F1 SuperSport 84% from 66 reviews and the Pilot Sport 4 S 85% from 180. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
- 84%from 66 reviews
- 81%would buy again
- 470,802 milesdriven by reviewers
Most owners agree the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport delivers outstanding dry grip and confidence, backed up by sharp steering response and strong dry handling, with many also praising its stability when driven hard. Wet grip is generally rated good for a UUHP tyre, though around one in ten owners specifically criticise wet handling, and a similar share note it can struggle in colder conditions. Comfort is the main compromise: close to three in ten owners find it too firm or unsettled over bumps. Tread life is more mixed, with a meaningful minority reporting rapid wear (especially on higher-torque use) while others see impressive longevity for the category.
- Exceptional dry grip, even when driven hard
- Precise steering response and strong feedback
- Very capable dry handling and cornering confidence
- Good wet grip for a UUHP summer tyre
- Firm, busy ride that can feel harsh over bumps
- Tread life is inconsistent, with some reporting fast wear
- Poor cold-weather grip; not a winter-friendly choice
Summarised by AI from 61 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 66 Eagle F1 SuperSport reviewsThe Goodyear SuperSport tires deliver immediate feedback and precise handling. The best part is how they completely changed the behavior of my S3 3‑door: it used to push from the nose, but with these tires the front end finally bites and the rear becomes playful.
The car is so much more fun to drive now.
They’re also almost indestructible, especially compared to Pirelli and Michelin (which have their own strengths, but durability isn’t one of them).
I really enjoyed these tires and would absolutely buy them again — unless Goodyear releases a new SuperSport.
Thanks, Goodyear. Great work.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
- 85%from 180 reviews
- 80%would buy again
- 2,122,714 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners broadly agree the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S delivers standout dry and wet grip, with over half mentioning strong dry traction and nearly half praising its wet confidence. Comfort is also a common plus for a max-performance tyre, though noise is more mixed, with a noticeable minority finding it loud. Longevity gets a more divided reception: many report solid tread life, but around one in eight complain about faster wear or uneven wear, and a smaller group say performance drops off as it wears. A further recurring criticism is a soft sidewall feel, with around one in ten owners reporting less support or precision than expected.
- Excellent dry grip and traction
- Very strong wet grip and confidence in the rain
- Comfortable ride for a performance tyre
- Stable, confidence-inspiring dry handling
- Noticeable road noise at certain speeds or on coarse surfaces
- Soft sidewalls can feel less supportive or precise
- Tread life can be shorter than expected for some drivers
Summarised by AI from 154 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 180 Pilot Sport 4 S reviewsThe wet and dry grip has been exceptional with low road noise and moderate harshness. Handling precision and responsiveness have been good, not exceptional. The tires have held inflation pressure very well with minimal leakage. This is my second set and unless Michelin comes out with a better max performance summer tire, I'll buy them again.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 75 sizes of the Eagle F1 SuperSport and 105 of the Pilot Sport 4 S, 60 of them made in both.
| Category | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 75 sizes, 18 to 23 inch | 105 sizes, 17 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 60 sizes 205/40 R18225/40 R18225/45 R18235/40 R18245/35 R18245/40 R18245/45 R18255/40 R18225/35 R19225/40 R19235/35 R19235/40 R19and 48 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A89%B11% | A84%B11%C2%D2% |
| EU label rolling resistance | D47%C30%B17%A5% | C55%D45% |
| EU label noise | 69-75 dB B85%A15% | 70-75 dB B100% |
| On the market since | 2021 | 2016 |
| Replaced | - | Michelin Pilot Super Sport (2010) |
| Replaced by | - | Michelin Pilot Sport S 5 |
| Awards | - | Winner: Best Tyres for High Performance Cars (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Winner: Best Tyres for High Performance Cars (DriverReviews, 2024/25) |
| Price in the shared tests | The Pilot Sport 4 S was the dearer tyre in 6 of the 7 tests that listed prices, by 9.8% on average. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This is a head-to-head between two of the most recognisable Max-Performance summer tyres: the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport (a more track-leaning, steering-focused option) and the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S (the benchmark all-round UUHP road tyre). Across 13 shared professional tests in multiple sizes and vehicles, they repeatedly trade small gains in outright lap pace and steering feel versus bigger differences in wet stopping, refinement and efficiency.
The pattern is clear: the Pilot Sport 4 S wins far more often overall (11 vs 2 test wins) because it stacks up consistently well in the safety-critical categories-especially wet braking-while also being quieter and typically more efficient. The Eagle F1 SuperSport's best moments come when the test prioritises steering response, balance and exploitable grip at the limit (often showing up in subjective handling scores and some wet/dry handling results), but it is also the tyre with the widest swing depending on size/fitment and test set-up-most notably the 2026 AutoBild Sports Cars result where it finished last with very weak wet braking and wet handling.
Conclusion
Across the shared data, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S is the safer, more complete tyre for fast road use. It dominates wet braking (11 wins to 1), and the differences can be meaningful: for example in AutoBild Sports Cars 2026 it stopped in 47.3 m vs the Goodyear's 51.5 m (about 4.2 m, ~8%). It's also usually the more refined and efficient choice-winning noise (8 wins to 1) and rolling resistance (11 wins to 1), which in practice means less motorway drone and typically better fuel/EV range over time.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport is best viewed as the more “driver's” tyre when conditions and fitment suit it. In EVO 2025 (235/35 R19) it delivered a standout performance and finished 2nd overall, beating the Michelin on wet braking (27.79 m vs 29.15 m), wet handling, and dry handling (66.88 s vs 67.96 s), with much stronger subjective dry scores (66 vs 56). That kind of result aligns with its reputation for sharp responses and an adjustable balance-attributes that matter on a demanding road loop or occasional track day.
The practical takeaway: if you want one premium summer tyre that nails everyday performance-car duties-wet safety, predictable grip, low noise and better efficiency-the Pilot Sport 4 S remains the default pick even when it's expensive. Choose the Eagle F1 SuperSport when steering immediacy and limit behaviour matter most, and you're confident your exact size/vehicle pairing is known to work well-because when it doesn't, the downside shows up first and hardest in the wet.
Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Pilot Sport 4 S: your questions
Is the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport or the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S the better tyre?
In the 13 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S finished ahead 11 times and the Eagle F1 SuperSport twice. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 8.9 and the Pilot Sport 4 S 9.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Eagle F1 SuperSport or the Pilot Sport 4 S?
The Pilot Sport 4 S led 31 of the 51 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.4% shorter in the wet across 12 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Pilot Sport 4 S led 21 of the 30 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.4% shorter in the dry across 12 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Pilot Sport 4 S had 8% lower rolling resistance (12 tests). Owners rate wear 7.2/10 for the Eagle F1 SuperSport and 8/10 for the Pilot Sport 4 S.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Pilot Sport 4 S was 1.3 dB quieter (9 tests). Owners rate comfort 7.3/10 for the Eagle F1 SuperSport and 8.4/10 for the Pilot Sport 4 S.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Eagle F1 SuperSport 84% from 66 reviews and the Pilot Sport 4 S 85% from 180. 81% of Eagle F1 SuperSport owners would buy it again, against 80% for the Pilot Sport 4 S.
Which is more expensive?
In the 7 tests that listed prices, the Pilot Sport 4 S was the dearer tyre in 6 of them, by 9.8% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Eagle F1 SuperSport is made in 75 sizes (18 to 23 inch) and the Pilot Sport 4 S in 105 (17 to 22 inch). 60 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Eagle F1 SuperSport is graded A for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Pilot Sport 4 S A and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Eagle F1 SuperSport is the newer design: it reached the market in 2021, the Pilot Sport 4 S in 2016. The Pilot Sport 4 S replaced the Michelin Pilot Super Sport.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs
Continental SportContact 7 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
9-2 in 12 shared tests
vs 
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs Pirelli P Zero PZ4
8-1 in 9 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
2-8 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs Pirelli P Zero PZ5
2-2 in 4 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
3-0 in 4 shared tests
vs
Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
1-1 in 3 shared tests
vs
Continental SportContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
10-1 in 11 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
1-1 in 2 shared tests
Every Goodyear vs Michelin test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tyres →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion