Apollo Alnac 4G Winter vs Zeetex WH 1000
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter finished ahead 2 times and the WH 1000 not once. The Alnac 4G Winter was stronger in wet.
Performance profile
Their shared tests recorded too few of the same measurements to chart, so the chart starts from each tyre's Tyre Reviews Score categories: its whole record, not shared tests.
Where each scores higher
Alnac 4G Winter
WH 1000
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Alnac 4G Winter | Gap | WH 1000 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wet Alnac 4G Winter ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 37.2 | 10.6% | 41.65 | 2-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 2 tests, 2021 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Alnac 4G Winter | Field | WH 1000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test | P15 of 55 | P42 of 55 | |
| 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview | P30 of 50 | P40 of 50 |
Alnac 4G Winter vs WH 1000: your questions
Is the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter or the Zeetex WH 1000 the better tyre?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter finished ahead 2 times and the WH 1000 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Alnac 4G Winter scores 8.3 and the WH 1000 3.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Alnac 4G Winter or the WH 1000?
The Alnac 4G Winter led 2 of the 2 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 10.6% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Alnac 4G Winter 89% from 4 reviews; the WH 1000 has no owner reviews yet.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Alnac 4G Winter is made in 26 sizes (13 to 16 inch) and the WH 1000 in 43 (16 to 19 inch). 2 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Alnac 4G Winter is graded C for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the WH 1000 B and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The WH 1000 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2017, the Alnac 4G Winter in 2014.
More comparisons with these tyres
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.