Kleber Citilander vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
The Kleber Citilander and the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 have met in one independent test so far, and the AllSeasonContact 2 finished ahead. The AllSeasonContact 2 was stronger in dry, wet, snow, comfort and value.
Performance profile
13 measurements from the one shared test, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Citilander
Not ahead on any measurement here
AllSeasonContact 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
Citilander
Not ahead in any category
AllSeasonContact 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tyres' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tyre that did better.
| Measurement | Citilander | Gap | AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | |||
| Dry Braking m | 45.7 | 9% | 41.6 |
| Dry Handling s | 55.01 | 1.2% | 54.37 |
| Wet AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | |||
| Wet Braking m | 52.3 | 14.3% | 44.8 |
| Wet Handling s | 90.6 | 4% | 87 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 73.7 | 5.2% | 77.5 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 2.73 | 11% | 3.03 |
| Snow AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | |||
| Snow Braking m | 19.9 | 3% | 19.3 |
| Snow Traction s | 9.58 | 6.4% | 8.97 |
| Snow Traction N | 307.9 | 2.7% | 316.3 |
| Snow Handling s | 89.5 | 11.3% | 79.4 |
| Comfort AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | |||
| Subj. Comfort pts | 6 | 14.7% | 6.88 |
| Noise dB | 68.3 | 2.2 dB | 66.1 |
| Value AllSeasonContact 2 ahead | |||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 0.79 | 17.2% | 0.66 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Citilander | Field | AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tyre Test | P8 of 9 | P2 of 9 |
Citilander vs AllSeasonContact 2: your questions
Is the Kleber Citilander or the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 the better tyre?
The Kleber Citilander and the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 have met in one independent test so far, and the AllSeasonContact 2 finished ahead. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Citilander scores 5.3 and the AllSeasonContact 2 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Citilander or the AllSeasonContact 2?
The AllSeasonContact 2 led 4 of the 4 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The AllSeasonContact 2 led 2 of the 2 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The AllSeasonContact 2 led 4 of the 4 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 2 83% from 70 reviews; the Citilander has no owner reviews yet.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Citilander is made in 18 sizes (15 to 18 inch) and the AllSeasonContact 2 in 140 (15 to 22 inch). 11 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Citilander is graded C for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the AllSeasonContact 2 B and B.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
10-15 in 26 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-4 in 13 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
15-1 in 17 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Goodyear Vector All Season 4
0-7 in 7 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
9-18 in 30 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3
6-3 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
11-1 in 12 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport
2-4 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.