Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 finished ahead 2 times and the Firehawk Sport once. The Firehawk Sport was stronger in comfort and value, the Proxes Sport 2 in dry and wet.
Performance profile
5 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Firehawk Sport
Proxes Sport 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 97%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 8 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Firehawk Sport
Proxes Sport 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Firehawk Sport
Not ahead in any category
Proxes Sport 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Firehawk Sport 79% from 6 reviews and the Proxes Sport 2 92% from 9. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Firehawk Sport | Gap | Proxes Sport 2 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Proxes Sport 2 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 35.6 | 2.2% | 34.8 | 0-3 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 114.3 | 0.1% | 114.4 | 0-1 |
| Wet Proxes Sport 2 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 34.33 | 0.3% | 34.5 | 2-1 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete m | 38 | 0.5% | 37.8 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 81.6 | 3.8% | 84.7 | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle s | 11.19 | 1.1% | 11.07 | 0-1 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 76.05 | 1.5% | 77.15 | 0-2 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 2.63 | 4.4% | 2.75 | 0-2 |
| Comfort Firehawk Sport ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 69.65 | 0.3 dB | 69.95 | 2-0 |
| Value Firehawk Sport ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 34,500 | 6.1% | 36,600 | 0-1 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.05 | 22% | 9.04 | 1-0 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.5 | 1.8% | 5.6 | 1-0 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 81.1 | 5.6% | 85.9 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 3 tests, 2023 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Firehawk Sport | Field | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | P23 of 50 | P16 of 50 | |
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | P7 of 18 | P11 of 18 | |
| 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test | P9 of 13 | P7 of 13 |
Firehawk Sport vs Proxes Sport 2: your questions
Is the Firestone Firehawk Sport or the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 the better tyre?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 finished ahead 2 times and the Firehawk Sport once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Firehawk Sport scores 8.6 and the Proxes Sport 2 9.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Firehawk Sport or the Proxes Sport 2?
The Proxes Sport 2 led 8 of the 10 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it held 4.4% more grip in curved aquaplaning across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Proxes Sport 2 led 4 of the 4 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.2% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8/10 for the Firehawk Sport and 8.5/10 for the Proxes Sport 2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Firehawk Sport 79% from 6 reviews and the Proxes Sport 2 92% from 9. 67% of Firehawk Sport owners would buy it again, against 100% for the Proxes Sport 2.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Proxes Sport 2 was the dearer tyre in 1 of them, by 2.1% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Firehawk Sport is made in 35 sizes (18 to 20 inch) and the Proxes Sport 2 in 113 (17 to 22 inch). 33 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Firehawk Sport is graded A for wet grip and B for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Proxes Sport 2 A and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
0-5 in 5 shared tests
vs
Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
0-7 in 7 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
4-1 in 5 shared tests
vs
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
3-0 in 3 shared tests
vs
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
8-0 in 8 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Firestone Firehawk Sport
4-1 in 5 shared tests
vs
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
2-0 in 3 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.