Laufenn S Fit EQ+ vs Firestone Firehawk Sport
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ finished ahead 2 times and the Firehawk Sport not once. The Firehawk Sport was stronger in dry.
Performance profile
11 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
S Fit EQ+
Firehawk Sport
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
S Fit EQ+
Not ahead in any category
Firehawk Sport
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
S Fit EQ+
Firehawk Sport
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the S Fit EQ+ 87% from 11 reviews and the Firehawk Sport 79% from 6. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | S Fit EQ+ | Gap | Firehawk Sport | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Firehawk Sport ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 34.9 | 0.9% | 34.6 | 0-2 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 117.1 | 0.2% | 116.9 | 1-0 |
| Wet Level | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 38.05 | 4.6% | 39.9 | 2-0 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 71.9 | 0.8% | 71.3 | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle s | 15.2 | 0.8% | 15.08 | 0-1 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 79.5 | 0.3% | 79.7 | 0-1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 2.65 | 17% | 3.1 | 0-1 |
| Comfort Level | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 16.3% | scored | 1-0 |
| Noise dB | 74 | 0.4 dB | 73.6 | 0-1 |
| Value Level | ||||
| Wear km | 31,080 | 7.7% | 28,860 | 1-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.7 | 12.4% | 7.62 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 2 tests in 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | S Fit EQ+ | Field | Firehawk Sport |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | P14 of 20 | P20 of 20 | |
| 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout | P12 of 52 | P15 of 52 |
S Fit EQ+ vs Firehawk Sport: your questions
Is the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ or the Firestone Firehawk Sport the better tyre?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ finished ahead 2 times and the Firehawk Sport not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the S Fit EQ+ scores 7.9 and the Firehawk Sport 8.6 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the S Fit EQ+ or the Firehawk Sport?
Across the shared tests the wet measurements are split 3-3 between the S Fit EQ+ and the Firehawk Sport.
Which is better in the dry?
The Firehawk Sport led 2 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 0.9% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.5/10 for the S Fit EQ+ and 8/10 for the Firehawk Sport.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the S Fit EQ+ 87% from 11 reviews and the Firehawk Sport 79% from 6. 91% of S Fit EQ+ owners would buy it again, against 67% for the Firehawk Sport.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The S Fit EQ+ is made in 74 sizes (15 to 20 inch) and the Firehawk Sport in 35 (18 to 20 inch). 17 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the S Fit EQ+ is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Firehawk Sport A and B.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Firehawk Sport is the newer design: it reached the market in 2023, the S Fit EQ+ in 2021. The S Fit EQ+ replaced the Laufenn S fit EQ. The Firehawk Sport replaced the Firestone Firehawk SZ90.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
0-5 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
0-7 in 7 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Firestone Firehawk Sport
4-1 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
1-2 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
3-2 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
0-4 in 4 shared tests
vs
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 vs Firestone Firehawk Sport
2-2 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Firestone Firehawk Sport vs Vredestein Ultrac Pro
1-4 in 5 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.