Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs Michelin CrossClimate 3
Ahead in each discipline
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ and the Michelin CrossClimate 3 have met in one independent test so far, and the CrossClimate 3 finished ahead. The CrossClimate 3 was stronger in snow, comfort and value.
Performance profile
12 measurements from the one shared test, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Solus 4S HA32+
CrossClimate 3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
Solus 4S HA32+
Not ahead in any category
CrossClimate 3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Solus 4S HA32+
CrossClimate 3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Solus 4S HA32+ 67% from 6 reviews and the CrossClimate 3 82% from 12. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tyres' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tyre that did better.
| Measurement | Solus 4S HA32+ | Gap | CrossClimate 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Level | |||
| Dry Braking m | 41.5 | 5.3% | 39.3 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | 73 | 1.4% | 72 |
| Wet Level | |||
| Wet Braking m | 31.3 | 1.6% | 31.8 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | 79 | 3.9% | 76 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 80 | 8.1% | 86.5 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 2.15 | 12.6% | 2.42 |
| Snow CrossClimate 3 ahead | |||
| Snow Braking m | 27.6 | 4.7% | 26.3 |
| Snow Traction N | 2,095 | 8.7% | 2,277 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | 69 | 14.5% | 79 |
| Comfort CrossClimate 3 ahead | |||
| Subj. Comfort pts | 74 | 10.8% | 82 |
| Subj. Noise pts | 75 | 4% | 78 |
| Value CrossClimate 3 ahead | |||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.51 | 6% | 8 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Solus 4S HA32+ | Field | CrossClimate 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 225/40 R18 | P9 of 9 | P4 of 9 |
Solus 4S HA32+ vs CrossClimate 3: your questions
Is the Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ or the Michelin CrossClimate 3 the better tyre?
The Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ and the Michelin CrossClimate 3 have met in one independent test so far, and the CrossClimate 3 finished ahead. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Solus 4S HA32+ scores 8.3 and the CrossClimate 3 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Solus 4S HA32+ or the CrossClimate 3?
Across the shared tests the wet measurements are split 2-2 between the Solus 4S HA32+ and the CrossClimate 3.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 1-1 between the Solus 4S HA32+ and the CrossClimate 3.
Which is better in snow?
The CrossClimate 3 led 3 of the 3 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7/10 for the Solus 4S HA32+ and 9/10 for the CrossClimate 3.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Solus 4S HA32+ 67% from 6 reviews and the CrossClimate 3 82% from 12. 67% of Solus 4S HA32+ owners would buy it again, against 75% for the CrossClimate 3.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
1-6 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Michelin CrossClimate 3 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
1-9 in 10 shared tests
vs
Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport vs Michelin CrossClimate 3
6-0 in 7 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3
6-3 in 9 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector All Season 4 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3
4-6 in 10 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs Vredestein Quatrac
1-5 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.