Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 and the Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X have met in one independent test so far, and the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 finished ahead. The UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 was stronger in wet and comfort, the Winter i cept evo 3 X in snow and value.
Performance profile
11 measurements from the one shared test, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1
Winter i cept evo 3 X
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1
Winter i cept evo 3 X
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1
Winter i cept evo 3 X
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 92% from 3 reviews and the Winter i cept evo 3 X 75% from 6. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tyres' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tyre that did better.
| Measurement | UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 | Gap | Winter i cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Level | |||
| Dry Braking m | 43.6 | 1.6% | 44.3 |
| Dry Handling s | 64.5 | 0.2% | 64.4 |
| Wet UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 ahead | |||
| Wet Braking m | 55 | 9.4% | 60.7 |
| Wet Handling s | 91.9 | 4.5% | 96.2 |
| Wet Circle s | 12.7 | 5.2% | 13.4 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 75.2 | 2.6% | 73.3 |
| Snow Winter i cept evo 3 X ahead | |||
| Snow Braking m | 29.8 | 5% | 28.3 |
| Snow Traction N | 2,964 | 4% | 3,084 |
| Snow Handling s | 29.9 | 1% | 29.6 |
| Comfort UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 ahead | |||
| Noise dB | 72 | 1 dB | 73 |
| Value Winter i cept evo 3 X ahead | |||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8 | 3.8% | 7.7 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2021
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 | Field | Winter i cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | P6 of 10 | P9 of 10 |
UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 vs Winter i cept evo 3 X: your questions
Is the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 or the Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X the better tyre?
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 and the Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X have met in one independent test so far, and the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 finished ahead. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 scores 8.5 and the Winter i cept evo 3 X 8.6 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 or the Winter i cept evo 3 X?
The UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 led 4 of the 4 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 1-1 between the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 and the Winter i cept evo 3 X.
Which is better in snow?
The Winter i cept evo 3 X led 3 of the 3 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 9.5/10 for the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 and 5.5/10 for the Winter i cept evo 3 X.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 92% from 3 reviews and the Winter i cept evo 3 X 75% from 6.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 is made in 36 sizes (16 to 22 inch) and the Winter i cept evo 3 X in 75 (17 to 22 inch). 29 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Winter i cept evo 3 X B and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
Every Goodyear vs Hankook test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tyres →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 Review the Winter i cept evo 3 X
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.