Hankook Winter i pike RS2 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 finished ahead 2 times and the Winter i pike RS2 not once. The Winter i pike RS2 was stronger in value, the UltraGrip Arctic 2 in dry, wet, snow and ice.
Performance profile
9 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Winter i pike RS2
UltraGrip Arctic 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 6 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Winter i pike RS2
UltraGrip Arctic 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Winter i pike RS2 | Gap | UltraGrip Arctic 2 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry UltraGrip Arctic 2 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 33.13 | 3.7% | 31.91 | 0-2 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Wet UltraGrip Arctic 2 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 35.63 | 0.6% | 35.42 | 1-1 |
| Wet Handling s | 38.35 | 0.2% | 38.25 | 1-1 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 56.8 | 0.9% | 57.3 | 0-1 |
| Snow UltraGrip Arctic 2 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 31.76 | 0.4% | 31.78 | 1-1 |
| Snow Traction s | 5.35 | 2% | 5.25 | 0-2 |
| Snow Handling s | 65.2 | 1.8% | 64 | 0-2 |
| Ice UltraGrip Arctic 2 ahead | ||||
| Ice Braking m | 27.99 | 11.9% | 25.44 | 0-2 |
| Ice Traction s | 5.21 | 3.7% | 5 | 0-2 |
| Ice Handling s | 48.9 | 3.5% | 47.35 | 0-2 |
| Comfort Level | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 100% | scored | 1-0 |
| Subj. Noise pts | scored | 16.7% | scored | 0-1 |
| Noise dB | 75.4 | = | 75.4 | 0-0 |
| Value Winter i pike RS2 ahead | ||||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 5.15 | 9.6% | 5.7 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 2 tests, 2021 to 2023
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Winter i pike RS2 | Field | UltraGrip Arctic 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Studded Tyre Test | P6 of 8 | P3 of 8 | |
| 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | P7 of 9 | P2 of 9 |
Winter i pike RS2 vs UltraGrip Arctic 2: your questions
Is the Hankook Winter i pike RS2 or the Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 the better tyre?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 finished ahead 2 times and the Winter i pike RS2 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Winter i pike RS2 scores 7.6 and the UltraGrip Arctic 2 9.2 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Winter i pike RS2 or the UltraGrip Arctic 2?
The UltraGrip Arctic 2 led 3 of the 5 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The UltraGrip Arctic 2 led 2 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.7% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The UltraGrip Arctic 2 led 5 of the 6 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it was 2% quicker in the snow traction test across 2 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.6/10 for the Winter i pike RS2 and 9/10 for the UltraGrip Arctic 2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Winter i pike RS2 83% from 5 reviews and the UltraGrip Arctic 2 91% from 1.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the UltraGrip Arctic 2 was the dearer tyre in 2 of them, by 17.9% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Hankook Winter i pike RS2 vs Michelin X Ice North 4
0-5 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
1-6 in 7 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 vs Michelin X Ice North 4
5-4 in 9 shared tests
vs
Continental IceContact 3 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2
1-7 in 8 shared tests
Every Hankook vs Goodyear test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tyres →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.