Menu

Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2

The Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 is a Premium Touring Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

8.6
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
80%
Wet Grip
100%
Road Feedback
90%
Handling
70%
Wear
0%
Comfort
90%
Buy again
100%
Snow Grip
100%
Ice Grip
100%
1 Reviews
91% Average
1,500 miles driven
7 Tests (avg: 3rd)
Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2

Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2

Winter Premium
BETA
8.6 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · High Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Ice
90.6
1.26x / 17 tests
Snow
86.1
1.5x / 17 tests
Wet
81.3
2x / 16 tests
Dry
64
1.2x / 10 tests
Comfort
59.9
0.29x / 7 tests
Value
44.2
0.38x / 6 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
87.7
12 tests
Braking
82.8
24 tests
Handling
81.8
21 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 7
Publications: 4
Period: 2021 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 1
Avg Rating: 91.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.38
History Points: 6
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test Tekniikan Maailma 2025 205/55 R16 3/14 10 metrics
2024 Studded Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2024 225/45 R17 4/8 13 metrics
The Best Studded / Friction Winter Tyres for 2024 Teknikens Varld 2024 225/50 R17 5/17 0 metrics
2023 Studded Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2023 225/45 R17 3/8 15 metrics
2022 Studded Winter Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2022 235/55 R18 3/8 14 metrics
2021 Nordic Studded Winter Tyre Test Moottori 2021 205/55 R16 3/8 10 metrics
2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test Teknikens Varld 2021 205/55 R16 2/16 11 metrics
7
Tests
3rd
Average
2nd
Best
5th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
The Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 is a consistently high-quality tyre that performs well in all winter conditions, feeling particularly safe and stable on snow. Although its lateral grip on ice is not at the highest level, its fundamental behavior remains calm. On asphalt, its properties are also balanced, steering confidently in extreme situations with good grip in both wet and dry conditions.
The Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2, a studded tyre, showed good ice and snow grip but fell behind the best performers in these conditions. It struggled on wet roads and had very high rolling resistance, negatively impacting fuel efficiency. The tyre's comfort and stability were average. While it provided decent winter performance, it couldn't compete with the top studded tyres in the test due to its weaknesses in other areas.
2024 Studded Tyre Test
225/45 R17 • 2024
4th/8
Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 delivers consistent performance and excellent braking across all conditions. It has the deepest tread pattern in the test, which may contribute to its somewhat vague steering feel. While safe and secure, it offers less precise handling for enthusiast drivers.

Questions and Answers for the Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Have you driven on the Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 >

Latest Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 Reviews

Given 91% while driving a BMW BMW E90 325d (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,500 spirited miles
Was in need for high quality studded winter tyres that supported spirited sideways driving on ice lake with a RWD car and Goodyear Artic 2 delivered. Tyres excel at ice grip in terms of braking and acceleration, when turning, unless you wish to go sideways, it is better to slow down first. It makes sense when looking at the studs because studs are not triangular shape like Michelin X-Ice north 4 nor Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 but rather plate/bowl shape? Either way, when driving straight, you will get the car to stop in emergencies. Snow grip is also excellent, no problems whatsoever when it comes to grip. Black ice is a tricky part, when the black ice is thin and is just a small coat over asphalt, snap oversteer is paramount, but on thicker black ice (frozen lake) it grips well. Comfort is also great, just some tyre humming due to studs but that is to be expected.

Since i drive a RWD car, of course i am going to disable ABS and all other assists the car has and take it to the ice road for sideways fun. RWD cars are not the best when it comes to acceleration from standstill on ice but with these tyres i had no problems getting going, took some time but it wasn't an issue. As for driving sideways, fun factor was 10/10. Transition from one side to another (Inertia drift/Scandinavian flick) is very smooth and understeer is hard to come by. Tyres don't warm up too much either so it maintains its grip for at least 3-4 kilometers of drift time, after that point, car starts to throw itself a lot more with less feedback than on cold tyres. I did crash into snowbanks and ice walls quite a few times and tyres took some strong impact because of it, however, the tyre stayed on the rim and no puncture was registered. I did lose air at 1 tyre when crashed into ice wall but that was only due to tyre being in bad position leaving a small air crack to leak air from but NO PUNCTURE nor TYRE COMING OFF THE RIM! Rim itself didn't get damaged either. My tyres did not come with Goodyears rim protection i think, but i did get extra load (XL), so i guess they are durable enough as they are.

For RWD cars that drive around during winter, these tyres are fantastic! Lots of sideways fun and predictable behavior on oversteer. Cornering is not so great like Michelin X-Ice North 4 or Hakkapeliitta 10 but straight line braking and acceleration grip make up for it. A bit expensive yet worthwhile investment for 800€ set!
Ask a question | Helpful 880
February 10, 2024