Menu

Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO vs Barum Polaris 3

Head to head 0-3 wins in 3 shared tests
Barum Polaris 3 Finished ahead

In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Barum Polaris 3 finished ahead 3 times and the Winterhawk 2 EVO not once.

Performance profile

Their shared tests recorded too few of the same measurements to chart, so the chart shows what owners rate each tyre on every question.

Dry GripWet GripRoad FeedbackHandlingWearComfortSnow GripIce Grip

Where owners rate each higher

Winterhawk 2 EVO

Not ahead in any category

Polaris 3

Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.

Owners rate the Winterhawk 2 EVO 69% from 10 reviews and the Polaris 3 86% from 18. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.

Head to head in 3 tests, 2012 to 2014

Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.

Test Winterhawk 2 EVO Field Polaris 3
2014 50 Winter Tyre Braking Overview Auto Bild · 2014 · 225/50 R17 P28 of 49 P16 of 49
2013 Winter Tyre Overview - Braking Auto Bild · 2013 · 195/65 R15 P23 of 50 P7 of 50
2012 European Tyre Test - 165/70 R14 ADAC · 2012 · 165/70 R14 P10 of 13 P4 of 13

Winterhawk 2 EVO vs Polaris 3: your questions

Is the Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO or the Barum Polaris 3 the better tyre?

In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Barum Polaris 3 finished ahead 3 times and the Winterhawk 2 EVO not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Winterhawk 2 EVO scores 6.2 and the Polaris 3 7.2 out of 10.

Which is quieter and more comfortable?

Owners rate comfort 7.3/10 for the Winterhawk 2 EVO and 8.6/10 for the Polaris 3.

What do owners say?

Owners rate the Winterhawk 2 EVO 69% from 10 reviews and the Polaris 3 86% from 18. 56% of Winterhawk 2 EVO owners would buy it again, against 94% for the Polaris 3.

Are they available in the same sizes?

The Winterhawk 2 EVO is made in 4 sizes (13 to 16 inch) and the Polaris 3 in 6 (13 to 16 inch). 0 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Winterhawk 2 EVO is graded C for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Polaris 3 C and E.

Which is the newer tyre?

The Polaris 3 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2011, the Winterhawk 2 EVO in 2010. The Winterhawk 2 EVO replaced the Firestone Winterhawk 2. The Polaris 3 replaced the Barum Polaris 2.

More comparisons with these tyres

Run either of these?

Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.

Review the Winterhawk 2 EVO Review the Polaris 3

Where this data comes from

Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.

About the TR Score

The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.

Who does the testing

Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.