Ceat SportDrive vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107 | four |
While it might look like the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is better than the Ceat SportDrive purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Low rolling resistance and better fuel consumption
- Strong projected wear and low abrasion (lower long-term cost)
- Lower external noise/refinement
- Better value score (lower price per performance)
- Class-leading dry braking across tests
- Consistently shorter wet braking distances
- Better dry and wet handling confidence and stability
- Competitive all-round performance near the front of test groups
Dry Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 stopped the vehicle in 7.53% less distance than the Ceat SportDrive.
Best In Dry Braking: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was 1.19% faster around a lap than the Ceat SportDrive.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 stopped the vehicle in 8.16% less distance than the Ceat SportDrive.
Best In Wet Braking: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 stopped the vehicle in 10.24% less distance than the Ceat SportDrive.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was 6.04% faster around a wet lap than the Ceat SportDrive.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was 1.39% faster around a wet circle than the Ceat SportDrive.
Best In Wet Circle: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one straight aqua tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 floated at a 1.5% higher speed than the Ceat SportDrive.
Best In Straight Aqua: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 slipped out at a 1.6% higher speed than the Ceat SportDrive.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat SportDrive was better during one subj. noise tests. On average the Ceat SportDrive scored 2.22% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Noise: Ceat SportDrive
See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat SportDrive was better during one noise tests. On average the Ceat SportDrive measured 1.92% quieter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Noise: Ceat SportDrive
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat SportDrive was better during one wear tests. On average the Ceat SportDrive is predicted to cover 23.95% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wear: Ceat SportDrive
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat SportDrive was better during one value tests. On average the Ceat SportDrive proved to have a 39.45% better value based on price/1000km than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Value: Ceat SportDrive
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat SportDrive was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Ceat SportDrive had a 21.96% lower rolling resistance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Ceat SportDrive
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat SportDrive was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Ceat SportDrive used 3.51% less fuel than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Ceat SportDrive
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat SportDrive was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Ceat SportDrive emitted 15.26% less particle wear matter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Abrasion: Ceat SportDrive
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Ceat SportDrive and Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
In total the Ceat SportDrive has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tyre 0% overall.
The Yokohama Advan Sport V107 has been reviewed 18 times and drivers have given the tyre 73% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
View all Ceat SportDrive driver reviews >>
Conclusion
Key Differences
- Braking: Yokohama stops 5-11% shorter in dry and 6-10% shorter in wet across tests
- Handling: Yokohama quicker in both dry and wet laps; Ceat trails notably in wet control
- Aquaplaning: Generally better curved/overall for Yokohama; straight-line roughly even
- Efficiency: Ceat has lower rolling resistance and better fuel use
- Longevity: Ceat shows substantially higher projected mileage and lower abrasion
- Value/Price: Ceat rated significantly better on value; Yokohama is pricier to buy and run
Overall Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Ceat SportDrive Top Comparisons
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.