Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
The data reveals a consistent pattern: Yokohama edges more metrics in pure dry stopping and delivers engaging steering feel, while Goodyear dominates in wet grip, aquaplaning resistance, rolling resistance, and wear. Notably, Goodyear converts those advantages into far stronger overall results and value scores, including multiple test wins and standout mileage.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been seven tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | seven |
While it might look like the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is better than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Outstanding wet performance: shorter wet braking and faster wet handling laps (e.g., −10.9% wet braking vs V107 in Auto Bild 2025)
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance and stability in rain (regular wins in straight aqua)
- Class-leading efficiency and longevity (significantly lower rolling resistance and 40-90% higher wear mileage)
- Top value and comfort balance; multiple overall test wins and 'exemplary'/'good' ratings
- Strong dry braking and incisive steering; grippy, engaging character
- Competitive dry handling pace; fun at the limit for spirited driving
- Lower purchase price in some tests/sizes
- Good subjective noise in certain evaluations
Dry Braking
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 stopped the vehicle in 0.23% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Dry Braking: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was 0.28% faster around a lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.83% faster around a lap than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 8% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Fun
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one subj. fun tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 scored 15% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Subj. Fun: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Subj. Fun winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 4.48% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Cool
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 2.79% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 5.04% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.78% faster around a wet lap than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 2.2% faster around a wet lap than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 10% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.6% faster around a wet circle than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during five straight aqua tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 floated at a 2.81% higher speed than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Straight Aqua: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 slipped out at a 1.74% higher speed than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two subj. comfort tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 10.32% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Subj. Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one subj. noise tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 scored 4.55% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Subj. Noise: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three noise tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 measured 2.53% quieter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Noise: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one noise tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 measured 0.69% quieter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Noise: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four wear tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is predicted to cover 35.84% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wear: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four value tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 proved to have a 33.21% better value based on price/1000km than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Value: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during two price tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 cost 2.4% less than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Price: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had a 16.58% lower rolling resistance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 used 1.75% less fuel than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two abrasion tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 emitted 21.6% less particle wear matter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Abrasion: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Driver Reviews
Across 160 driver reviews, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely praised for outstanding dry and wet grip, progressive and predictable handling, strong braking, and a surprisingly comfortable, quiet ride for a UHP tyre. Many users report improved confidence and everyday refinement versus previous tyres (including PS4/PS5, PZ4, and various runflats), with good value for money also noted. Minority complaints focus on faster wear and relatively low new tread depth, increased noise on rough asphalt, and a softer sidewall feel that can dull initial turn-in or feel floaty at higher speeds. Overall sentiment is strongly positive for performance-focused daily use.
Based on 173 reviews with an average rating of 86%
Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Driver Reviews
Drivers report the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 delivers strong dry grip, sharp handling, and confident wet performance when warm, with several high-scoring reviews praising its sporty feel and feedback (including on EVs). However, many note high road noise on coarse surfaces and notably fast tread wear, making it less ideal for daily comfort or longevity-focused use.
Based on 18 reviews with an average rating of 73%
I have now had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's, Goodyear Eagle F1 Supersports, Michelin PS4 and even some Avon's (for a brief period) on my current car - a Golf GTI Clubsport 40.
I mix up my driving a lot - lots of motorway driving but also lots of hard street driving and B road blasts, I find it massively important to have the best tyres possible to allow me to push my car as hard as I can in a safe manner.
I was massively impressed with the Asymmetric 5's, the sheer grip... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
The Advan Sport V107's appeal is its dry focus: quick steering, strong dry braking, and a playful balance that drivers may prefer on a warm back road or occasional track day. However, its higher rolling resistance, shorter mileage and weaker wet performance limit its all-weather road suitability. For most buyers, Goodyear is the safer, cheaper-to-own choice; for enthusiasts prioritising steering feel in the dry, Yokohama has a niche advantage.
Key Differences
- Wet safety: Goodyear consistently stops shorter and handles faster in the wet (often ~3-11% advantage)
- Aquaplaning: Goodyear typically leads in straight aquaplaning; Yokohama occasionally edges curved tests
- Efficiency: Goodyear has much lower rolling resistance (≈15-20% better), improving fuel economy
- Wear/longevity: Goodyear delivers substantially higher mileage (commonly +40-90%)
- Value: Goodyear's cost per 1,000 km is markedly lower despite similar or slightly higher purchase price
- Dry focus: Yokohama often edges dry braking and offers sharper steering/'fun' feel; Goodyear is more neutral and composed
Overall Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.