Menu

Continental VikingContact 8 vs Michelin X Ice Snow

This head-to-head pits two Nordic friction winter heavyweights against each other: Continental's new VikingContact 8 and Michelin's X-Ice Snow. Both target quiet, fuel-efficient winter touring for passenger cars, but they take different paths to grip and balance.
Across five shared professional tests in 2024-2025, the Continental dominated overall (5/5 test wins), repeatedly pairing strong dry/wet control with class-leading snow/ice consistency and notably low rolling resistance. The Michelin counters with standout comfort and competitive straight-line ice braking, but its wet and dry asphalt performance and aquaplaning balance lag behind the class leader.
VikingContact-8 VS X-Ice-Snow

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of five total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Continental VikingContact 8five
five wins

While it might look like the Continental VikingContact 8 is better than the Michelin X Ice Snow purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Class-leading overall balance with 5/5 test wins
  • Shorter dry and wet braking; sharper handling on asphalt
  • Best-in-test snow/ice consistency and stable limit behavior
  • Low rolling resistance with low external noise
  • Excellent ride comfort and very low cabin noise
  • Strong straight-line ice braking performance
  • Good straight aquaplaning and curved aquaplaning resistance
  • Stable, predictable behavior at moderate pace

Dry Braking

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 stopped the vehicle in 3.71% less distance than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
36.07M
Michelin X Ice Snow
37.46M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
31.2M
Michelin X Ice Snow
31.57M (+0.37M)
Continental VikingContact 8
45.6M
Michelin X Ice Snow
48.6M (+3M)
Continental VikingContact 8
31.4M
Michelin X Ice Snow
32.2M (+0.8M)

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 was 0.85% faster around a lap than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
58.5s
Michelin X Ice Snow
59s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
58.5s
Michelin X Ice Snow
59s (+0.5s)

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during two subj. dry handling tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 scored 11.99% more points than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
7.67 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
6.75 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
4 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
4 Points
Continental VikingContact 8
10 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
9.25 Points (-0.75 Points)
Continental VikingContact 8
9 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
7 Points (-2 Points)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 stopped the vehicle in 3.47% less distance than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
40.67M
Michelin X Ice Snow
42.13M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
40.1M (+1M)
Michelin X Ice Snow
39.1M
Continental VikingContact 8
42.4M
Michelin X Ice Snow
46.2M (+3.8M)
Continental VikingContact 8
39.5M
Michelin X Ice Snow
41.1M (+1.6M)

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during three wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 was 3.79% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
58.21s
Michelin X Ice Snow
60.5s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
41.2s
Michelin X Ice Snow
41.7s (+0.5s)
Continental VikingContact 8
93.12s
Michelin X Ice Snow
98.01s (+4.89s)
Continental VikingContact 8
40.3s
Michelin X Ice Snow
41.8s (+1.5s)

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during two subj. wet handling tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 scored 6.39% more points than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
7.83 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
7.33 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
9.5 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
9 Points (-0.5 Points)
Continental VikingContact 8
8 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
7 Points (-1 Points)
Continental VikingContact 8
6 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
6 Points

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 was 6.15% faster around a wet circle than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
13.44s
Michelin X Ice Snow
14.32s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
13.44s
Michelin X Ice Snow
14.32s (+0.88s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow floated at a 5.92% higher speed than the Continental VikingContact 8.

Continental VikingContact 8
57.7Km/H
Michelin X Ice Snow
61.33Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin X Ice Snow

Continental VikingContact 8
59.8Km/H (-4.9Km/H)
Michelin X Ice Snow
64.7Km/H
Continental VikingContact 8
56.6Km/H (-0.7Km/H)
Michelin X Ice Snow
57.3Km/H
Continental VikingContact 8
56.7Km/H (-5.3Km/H)
Michelin X Ice Snow
62Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow slipped out at a 10.65% higher speed than the Continental VikingContact 8.

Continental VikingContact 8
1.51m/sec2
Michelin X Ice Snow
1.69m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin X Ice Snow

Continental VikingContact 8
1.51m/sec2 (-0.18m/sec2)
Michelin X Ice Snow
1.69m/sec2

Snow Braking

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during two snow braking tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow stopped the vehicle in 0.08% less distance than the Continental VikingContact 8.

Continental VikingContact 8
26.38M
Michelin X Ice Snow
26.36M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Michelin X Ice Snow

Continental VikingContact 8
12.72M (+0.22M)
Michelin X Ice Snow
12.5M
Continental VikingContact 8
16.81M (+0.14M)
Michelin X Ice Snow
16.67M
Continental VikingContact 8
49.6M
Michelin X Ice Snow
49.9M (+0.3M)

Snow Traction

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during three snow traction tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 accelerated 3.35% faster than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
4.33s
Michelin X Ice Snow
4.48s
Snow acceleration time, lower is better

Best In Snow Traction: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
4.19s
Michelin X Ice Snow
4.23s (+0.04s)
Continental VikingContact 8
3s
Michelin X Ice Snow
3.12s (+0.12s)
Continental VikingContact 8
5.8s
Michelin X Ice Snow
6.1s (+0.3s)

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during two snow handling [s] tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 was 1.33% faster around a lap than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
79.95s
Michelin X Ice Snow
81.03s
Snow handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
79.7s
Michelin X Ice Snow
81s (+1.3s)
Continental VikingContact 8
80.2s
Michelin X Ice Snow
81.06s (+0.86s)

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during two subj. snow handling tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 scored 15% more points than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
15 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
12.75 Points
Subjective Snow Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
10 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
9.5 Points (-0.5 Points)
Continental VikingContact 8
20 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
16 Points (-4 Points)

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 was 3.54% faster through a slalom than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
3.39m/sec2
Michelin X Ice Snow
3.27m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
3.39m/sec2
Michelin X Ice Snow
3.27m/sec2 (-0.12m/sec2)

Ice Braking

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during three ice braking tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow stopped the vehicle 4.7% shorter than the Continental VikingContact 8.

Continental VikingContact 8
22.13M
Michelin X Ice Snow
21.09M
Ice braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Ice Braking: Michelin X Ice Snow

Continental VikingContact 8
11.97M (+1.28M)
Michelin X Ice Snow
10.69M
Continental VikingContact 8
7.31M (+0.34M)
Michelin X Ice Snow
6.97M
Continental VikingContact 8
47.1M (+1.5M)
Michelin X Ice Snow
45.6M

Ice Traction

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during two ice traction tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow accelerated 1.98% faster than the Continental VikingContact 8.

Continental VikingContact 8
7.07s
Michelin X Ice Snow
6.93s
Ice acceleration time, lower is better

Best In Ice Traction: Michelin X Ice Snow

Continental VikingContact 8
8.44s (+0.91s)
Michelin X Ice Snow
7.53s
Continental VikingContact 8
6.48s (+0.02s)
Michelin X Ice Snow
6.46s
Continental VikingContact 8
6.3s
Michelin X Ice Snow
6.8s (+0.5s)

Ice Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during two ice handling [s] tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 was 3.86% faster around a lap than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
59.8s
Michelin X Ice Snow
62.2s
Ice handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Ice Handling [s]: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
64.6s
Michelin X Ice Snow
67.8s (+3.2s)
Continental VikingContact 8
54.99s
Michelin X Ice Snow
56.59s (+1.6s)

Subj. Ice Handling

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during two subj. ice handling tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 scored 19.23% more points than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
13 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
10.5 Points
Subjective Ice Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Ice Handling: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
10 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
9 Points (-1 Points)
Continental VikingContact 8
16 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
12 Points (-4 Points)

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow scored 5.06% more points than the Continental VikingContact 8.

Continental VikingContact 8
9.38 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
9.88 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Michelin X Ice Snow

Continental VikingContact 8
9.75 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
9.75 Points
Continental VikingContact 8
9 Points (-1 Points)
Michelin X Ice Snow
10 Points

Subj. Noise

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during one subj. noise tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow scored 10% more points than the Continental VikingContact 8.

Continental VikingContact 8
9 Points
Michelin X Ice Snow
10 Points
Subjective in car noise levels, higher is better

Best In Subj. Noise: Michelin X Ice Snow

Continental VikingContact 8
9 Points (-1 Points)
Michelin X Ice Snow
10 Points

Noise

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during two noise tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 measured 0.56% quieter than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
70.45dB
Michelin X Ice Snow
70.85dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
71.8dB
Michelin X Ice Snow
72.1dB (+0.3dB)
Continental VikingContact 8
69.1dB
Michelin X Ice Snow
69.6dB (+0.5dB)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 had a 10.44% lower rolling resistance than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
7.29kg / t
Michelin X Ice Snow
8.14kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
7.29kg / t
Michelin X Ice Snow
8.14kg / t (+0.85kg / t)

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental VikingContact 8 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Continental VikingContact 8 used 1.43% less fuel than the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Continental VikingContact 8
5.51l/100km
Michelin X Ice Snow
5.59l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Continental VikingContact 8

Continental VikingContact 8
5.3l/100km
Michelin X Ice Snow
5.45l/100km (+0.15l/100km)
Continental VikingContact 8
5.726l/100km
Michelin X Ice Snow
5.726l/100km

Real World Driver Reviews

Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Continental VikingContact 8 and Michelin X Ice Snow.

In total the Continental VikingContact 8 has been reviewed 4 times and drivers have given the tyre 78% overall.

The Michelin X Ice Snow has been reviewed 16 times and drivers have given the tyre 84% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Michelin X Ice Snow.

Best Review for the Continental VikingContact 8
Given 82% 235/50 R18 on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
I only have around 1,000 miles on these tires, but I was able to drive them in some heavy snow and ice conditions, so I can attest to their incredible performance in inclement weather. The ice grip is where I have been most impressed. The lateral traction I have felt in icy conditions make these feel incredibly capable and safe. I was able to drive on the freeway at a normal pace, while most of the other cars on the road slowed to a crawl. Snow grip has been very good too. Even when I put my F34 BMW into "Sport+" I have to try hard to get it sideways. These tires are also incredibly... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 215 - tyre reviewed on December 8, 2025
View all Continental VikingContact 8 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Michelin X Ice Snow
Given 93% 225/45 R17 on mostly country roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Previously owned the Michelin alpin 4a on a volkswagen tiguan. Fantastic tyres, Decided to choose the new version for my Fiat Panda cross. The x ice snow is an amazing tyre. It has been raining and snowing for the last month, i leave for work every morning in -10c and come home at night in -3c. Fresh snow, sludge, rain and ice. The tyre is amazing. I feel confident while driving In all conditions. Recently went offroading in a few mountain trails. Parked the car up and iced road, jumped out with the kids, and we could not walk without falling over, Completely iced over. I did not even... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1272 - tyre reviewed on December 5, 2020
View all Michelin X Ice Snow driver reviews >>

Conclusion

The VikingContact 8 is the more complete winter tyre. It consistently stops shorter and steers cleaner on dry and wet roads, resists rolling losses better, and leads or matches on snow and ice handling-translating to confident control in mixed Nordic conditions. Its main caveat is aquaplaning, where it can trail the best in straight and curved tests, though its overall wet grip and braking remain superior to the Michelin.
The X-Ice Snow shines for ride refinement and low noise and can deliver very strong straight-line ice braking. However, recurring weaknesses in wet and dry grip, longer stopping distances on asphalt, and lower lateral ice/snow grip limit its all-round capability. If your priority is maximum cabin quiet and comfort with acceptable winter traction and you rarely face hard ice or evasive wet maneuvers, the Michelin fits. For drivers seeking broad, confidence-inspiring performance throughout freeze-thaw, slush, wet, and packed-snow conditions, the Continental is the clear choice.
Key Differences
  • Overall results: Continental won all 5 shared tests; Michelin had none
  • Asphalt performance: Continental consistently shorter wet braking (e.g., 42.4 m vs 46.2 m) and faster wet handling; Michelin weakest in dry/wet in multiple tests
  • Snow/ice balance: Michelin often best in ice braking, but Continental leads ice/snow handling and traction more often, yielding better control at the limit
  • Efficiency: Continental shows lower rolling resistance (e.g., 7.29 vs 8.14 kg/t) and competitive fuel use; Michelin averages higher
  • Comfort/noise: Michelin is quieter in-cabin and scores top comfort; Continental is quiet externally but slightly firmer
  • Aquaplaning: Michelin usually better in straight/curved aquaplaning; Continental's main weakness is aquaplaning despite superior wet grip/braking
Continental VikingContact 8

Overall Winner: Continental VikingContact 8

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Continental VikingContact 8 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.