Menu

Ceat WinterDrive vs Firestone Winterhawk 4

In this article we will be looking at independent tyre test data, and real world driver reviews of the Ceat WinterDrive and the Firestone Winterhawk 4 to find out which tyre is best for your own driving.

The good news is that both the Ceat WinterDrive and Firestone Winterhawk 4 are Touring Winter tyres designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars, which means comparing the two tyres is relatively simple.

Both tyres are hugely popular in the market place with drivers, and both have been featured in independent tyre tests.

WinterDrive VS Winterhawk-4

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of four total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Ceat WinterDrivetwo
two wins
Firestone Winterhawk 4two
two wins

The Ceat WinterDrive and Firestone Winterhawk 4 have an equal number of test wins. However, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Dry Braking

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive stopped the vehicle in 7.47% less distance than the Firestone Winterhawk 4.

Ceat WinterDrive
42.75M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
46.2M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
42M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
45.2M (+3.2M)
Ceat WinterDrive
43.5M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
47.2M (+3.7M)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive was 1.66% faster around a lap than the Firestone Winterhawk 4.

Ceat WinterDrive
114.7Km/H
Firestone Winterhawk 4
112.8Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
114.7Km/H
Firestone Winterhawk 4
112.8Km/H (-1.9Km/H)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Firestone Winterhawk 4 stopped the vehicle in 6.19% less distance than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
42.03M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
39.43M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Firestone Winterhawk 4

Ceat WinterDrive
39M (+3.5M)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
35.5M
Ceat WinterDrive
34.5M (+1.5M)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
33M
Ceat WinterDrive
36.9M (+2.1M)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
34.8M
Ceat WinterDrive
57.7M (+3.3M)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
54.4M

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Firestone Winterhawk 4 stopped the vehicle in 3.78% less distance than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
39.7M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
38.2M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Firestone Winterhawk 4

Ceat WinterDrive
39.7M (+1.5M)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
38.2M

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was 2.09% faster around a wet lap than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
79.8Km/H
Firestone Winterhawk 4
81.5Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Firestone Winterhawk 4

Ceat WinterDrive
79.8Km/H (-1.7Km/H)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
81.5Km/H

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was 1.1% faster around a wet circle than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
12.69s
Firestone Winterhawk 4
12.55s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Firestone Winterhawk 4

Ceat WinterDrive
12.69s (+0.14s)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
12.55s

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Firestone Winterhawk 4 floated at a 4.21% higher speed than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
71.7Km/H
Firestone Winterhawk 4
74.85Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Firestone Winterhawk 4

Ceat WinterDrive
71.5Km/H (-2.3Km/H)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
73.8Km/H
Ceat WinterDrive
71.9Km/H (-4Km/H)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
75.9Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Firestone Winterhawk 4 slipped out at a 5.5% higher speed than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
2.06m/sec2
Firestone Winterhawk 4
2.18m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Firestone Winterhawk 4

Ceat WinterDrive
2.06m/sec2 (-0.12m/sec2)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
2.18m/sec2

Snow Braking

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one snow braking tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive stopped the vehicle in 0.7% less distance than the Firestone Winterhawk 4.

Ceat WinterDrive
24.08M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
24.25M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
30.2M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
30.9M (+0.7M)
Ceat WinterDrive
9.7M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
9.7M
Ceat WinterDrive
28.2M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
28.2M
Ceat WinterDrive
28.2M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
28.2M

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Firestone Winterhawk 4 had 0.99% better snow traction than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
1396N
Firestone Winterhawk 4
1410N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Firestone Winterhawk 4

Ceat WinterDrive
245N
Firestone Winterhawk 4
243N (-2N)
Ceat WinterDrive
2547N (-30N)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
2577N

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was 0.17% faster around a lap than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
58Km/H
Firestone Winterhawk 4
58.1Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Firestone Winterhawk 4

Ceat WinterDrive
58Km/H (-0.1Km/H)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
58.1Km/H

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was 1.39% faster through a slalom than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
2.84m/sec2
Firestone Winterhawk 4
2.88m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Firestone Winterhawk 4

Ceat WinterDrive
2.84m/sec2 (-0.04m/sec2)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
2.88m/sec2

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive stopped the vehicle 3.73% shorter than the Firestone Winterhawk 4.

Ceat WinterDrive
15.5M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
16.1M
Ice braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Ice Braking: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
15.5M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
16.1M (+0.6M)

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive and Firestone Winterhawk 4 performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.

Ceat WinterDrive
7.3 Points
Firestone Winterhawk 4
7.3 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tyres performed equally well

Ceat WinterDrive
7.3 Points
Firestone Winterhawk 4
7.3 Points

Noise

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during two noise tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive measured 1.51% quieter than the Firestone Winterhawk 4.

Ceat WinterDrive
68.55dB
Firestone Winterhawk 4
69.6dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
71.6dB
Firestone Winterhawk 4
72.9dB (+1.3dB)
Ceat WinterDrive
65.5dB
Firestone Winterhawk 4
66.3dB (+0.8dB)

Wear

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during two wear tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive is predicted to cover 19.47% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Firestone Winterhawk 4.

Ceat WinterDrive
58270KM
Firestone Winterhawk 4
46925KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
64600KM
Firestone Winterhawk 4
48800KM (-15800KM)
Ceat WinterDrive
51940KM
Firestone Winterhawk 4
45050KM (-6890KM)

Value

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one value tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive proved to have a 26.73% better value based on price/1000km than the Firestone Winterhawk 4.

Ceat WinterDrive
7.32Price/1000
Firestone Winterhawk 4
9.99Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
7.32Price/1000
Firestone Winterhawk 4
9.99Price/1000 (+2.67Price/1000)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Firestone Winterhawk 4 had a 6.5% lower rolling resistance than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
9.07kg / t
Firestone Winterhawk 4
8.48kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Firestone Winterhawk 4

Ceat WinterDrive
9.07kg / t (+0.59kg / t)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
8.48kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Firestone Winterhawk 4 used 1.72% less fuel than the Ceat WinterDrive.

Ceat WinterDrive
5.8l/100km
Firestone Winterhawk 4
5.7l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Firestone Winterhawk 4

Ceat WinterDrive
5.8l/100km (+0.1l/100km)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
5.7l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat WinterDrive was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Ceat WinterDrive emitted 11.11% less particle wear matter than the Firestone Winterhawk 4.

Ceat WinterDrive
64mg/km/t
Firestone Winterhawk 4
72mg/km/t
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Ceat WinterDrive

Ceat WinterDrive
64mg/km/t
Firestone Winterhawk 4
72mg/km/t (+8mg/km/t)

Real World Driver Reviews

Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Ceat WinterDrive and Firestone Winterhawk 4.

In total the Ceat WinterDrive has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tyre 0% overall.

The Firestone Winterhawk 4 has been reviewed 5 times and drivers have given the tyre 79% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Firestone Winterhawk 4.

Best Review for the Ceat WinterDrive
View all Ceat WinterDrive driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Firestone Winterhawk 4
Given 92% 205/55 R16 on a combination of roads for 1,800 average miles
I bought 4 brand new tyres in November 2020 and this review is after 3000km. I'm pretty happy with them. The price was pretty good in comparison with Bridgestone and Michelin. Although I try to skip as much icy roads as possible, in rain or snow they perform well. I tried them even in a snowy mountain and everything was alright. Braking path is fairly short no matter the weather. No road noises, good responsiveness and they feel pretty reliable. For a budget tyre, this is a really good value for money.
Helpful 1210 - tyre reviewed on March 17, 2021
View all Firestone Winterhawk 4 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

In conclusion the Ceat WinterDrive performed better in dry braking, dry handling [km/h], snow braking, ice braking, noise, wear, value and abrasion, while the Firestone Winterhawk 4 performed better in wet braking, wet braking - concrete, wet handling [km/h], wet circle, straight aqua, curved aquaplaning, snow traction, snow handling [km/h], snow slalom, rolling resistance and fuel consumption.

Interestingly, both tyres performed equally well in dry handling, wet handling, snow handling and subj. comfort, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.

Which tyre is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tyre. Comparing all the data in the tyre reviews database, on balance Firestone Winterhawk 4 seems to be the best tyre overall.

However, it's important to note that both tyres have their strengths.

Remember, the best tyre for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.

Firestone Winterhawk 4

Overall Winner: Firestone Winterhawk 4

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:

Ceat WinterDrive Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tyre.

Firestone Winterhawk 4 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tyre.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.