Menu

BFGoodrich All Terrain KO3 vs Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT

Overall test winnerPirelli Scorpion XTM AT

The BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 has been a benchmark all-terrain tyre thanks to its excellent comfort, low road noise, strong off-road traction and outstanding snow performance.

BFGoodrich All Terrain KO3 vs Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT
285/70 R17 / 2025 View full image
BFGoodrich All Terrain KO3 vs Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT
Tyres tested
2
Tested size
285/70 R17
Test vehicle
2024 Ford Bronco 3.3 v6
Disciplines
4

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

2 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

How the results are weighted

1st

Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT

+Sharper, more predictable steering on road and off, and easier to control when sliding or climbing out of ruts.

−Slightly firmer over the initial impact and a touch noisier than the KO3.

Read full verdict
2nd

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO3

+Better at rounding off big impacts and slightly quieter, with strong off-road traction.

−Slower steering response on and off road, needing more input to correct.

Read full verdict

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

BFGoodrich All Terrain KO3 vs Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT · 285/70 R17

TyrePirelli Scorpion XTM ATBFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO3
Position1st2nd
Category scores (% of best)
Dry 35% of overall score100%90%
Off road 35% of overall score100%95%
Comfort 30% of overall score97.5%100%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

The BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO3 has been a benchmark all-terrain tyre thanks to its excellent comfort, low road noise, strong off-road traction and outstanding snow performance. Pirelli’s brand-new Scorpion XTM arrives with bold claims that it matches or outperforms the KO3 across dry, wet, snow, mud and grass, while improving rolling resistance and steering response. I set out to see how those claims stack up with back-to-back subjective testing on-road and off-road.

BFGoodrich All Terrain KO3 vs Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT

About the Pirelli Scorpion XTM

The XTM replaces the Scorpion AT+ and has been developed with the North American market in mind. It’s far more aggressive visually and, according to Pirelli’s internal development data, combines attributes of two leading competitors while adding lower rolling resistance and sharper steering. There’s also an Elect version aimed at EVs that further reduces rolling resistance with a small trade-off in mud performance. Both versions carry the 3PMSF snow symbol.

There are two versions of the new XTM, the 'regular' version, and an ELECT version. The ELECT version trades a little mud traction for lower rolling resistance, and while it was designed for electric trucks, it could be the better choice for regular trucks too that spend more time on-road than off.

Based on Pirellis launch event presentation, the XTM and XTM ELECT out performs the combined qualities of two leading competitors. The competitors aren't published but it seems likely they are BFGoodrich and Falken.

But how does the XTM drive compared to the KO3?

On-Road Performance

Comfort

Both tyres impressed but with different strengths. The KO3 excels at rounding out big impacts, making potholes and sharp bumps feel less harsh. However, it transmits more vibration over surfaces with constant small imperfections. The XTM is firmer over the initial impact but settles more quickly, reducing post-impact vibrations. Which is “better” depends on the roads you drive — KO3 for big-hit comfort, XTM for smoother recovery over minor bumps.

Noise

Noise levels were close. On some surfaces, the KO3 was slightly quieter with a lower pitch; on others, the XTM matched or bettered it in decibel level. The KO3 takes a marginal win overall for tone and refinement, but the difference is small.

Steering Response
Here, the XTM pulled ahead. It feels more reactive and predictable, giving greater confidence when cornering, without introducing nervousness on the straight. The KO3, by comparison, has slower turn-in and can feel less settled over undulations. For drivers who value steering precision, the XTM is the stronger choice.

Off-Road Performance

Testing took place across sand, rock, deep gravel, and boulder-strewn trails, with pressures dropped from 39 PSI to 25 PSI off-road.

Traction and Braking

Both tyres offered excellent grip on all surfaces tested, with no damage sustained despite challenging terrain. On sand, the XTM felt slightly more eager on initial bite, but differences in outright traction and braking were minimal.

Steering and Handling

As on-road, the XTM offered sharper, more predictable steering, especially at speed on loose surfaces. It was also easier to steer out of ruts and grooves, giving it an advantage in driver confidence. The KO3 required more steering input to achieve the same result, making it feel less agile.

Sliding and Control
In rear-wheel-drive testing, the XTM’s slides were more progressive and easier to control. The KO3 sometimes broke traction more abruptly at the rear, demanding quicker corrections.

Verdict

These are two premium, class-leading all-terrain tyres. The KO3 remains a superb choice for drivers prioritising big-impact comfort and a touch more refinement in noise on certain surfaces. However, in this back-to-back, the Pirelli Scorpion XTM edged ahead overall thanks to its sharper steering, composed on-road manners and confidence-inspiring behaviour off-road.

This was a subjective comparison; a full instrumented test is coming. In the meantime, if you try the XTM, I’d love to hear how it compares to your previous all-terrain tyres.

Results

BFGoodrich All Terrain KO3 vs Pirelli Scorpion XTM ATWatch the full video of this test on YouTube Watch on YouTube

1st

Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT

285/70 R17 116/113Q
Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT
The new Scorpion XTM marks a significant step forward for Pirelli in the all-terrain space. Designed with the North American market in mind, it combines a more aggressive tread with a lighter overall weight, sharper steering, and strong all-surface performance. On-road, the XTM offers a firmer ride on initial impact but quickly settles, giving it an edge on surfaces with constant minor imperfections. Noise levels are competitive with the KO3, but its real advantage lies in steering response and predictability, both on tarmac and loose terrain. Off-road, it proved equally grippy while being easier to control, especially when sliding or steering out of ruts. In this test, the XTM edged ahead overall, showing Pirelli has built a genuine rival to the established leaders.
Dry100%
Off road100%
Comfort97.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (4)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Subj. Road ScoreHigher is better1st / 210 PointsBest in this discipline
Subj. Dirt HandlingHigher is better1st / 210 PointsBest in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 29.75 Points-0.25 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better2nd / 29.75 Points-0.25 Points
Production
3424
Code
1UN VC130T
Origin
Mexico
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
22.58 kgs
Tread
10.8 mm
2nd

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO3

285/70 R17 116/113S
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO3
The BFGoodrich KO3 continues the brand’s legacy of being a benchmark in the all-terrain category. It impresses with excellent road manners, combining low noise with class-leading comfort over larger impacts, making it a very easy tyre to live with day to day. Off-road, it delivers superb traction and durability across sand, gravel, and rock, with its robust construction shrugging off harsh terrain. However, the KO3’s steering can feel slower to react both on and off-road, and it requires more input to correct when unsettled, which may leave more enthusiastic drivers wanting a touch more precision. Still, it remains a dependable and highly capable all-rounder.
Dry90%
Off road95%
Comfort100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (4)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Subj. Road ScoreHigher is better2nd / 29 Points-1.00 Points
Subj. Dirt HandlingHigher is better2nd / 29.5 Points-0.50 Points
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 210 PointsBest in this discipline
Subj. NoiseHigher is better1st / 210 PointsBest in this discipline
Production
1625
Code
1BE BF F711
Origin
USA
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
26.13 kgs
Tread
11.8 mm

Discussion

2 comments
  1. Josh archived

    Jonathan, this load rating (116) is not available in the US. I've checked Pirelli's website, tire rack, Discount, and others... the only google search result for the product code you shared is your blog post... so perhaps you got a pre-release that isn't public yet. Unfortunately I need tires on my lifted tacoma and was eager to try this one out for the weight savings and performance gains... but if it's not available then a set of KO3's are going on the rig in 285/70/17 (LRC). The LRE version of the scorpion is rated at 63 lb which is heavier than the KO3 and competitors... So I guess I'll be sticking with the KO3 for a while.

    #10514
    1. TyreReviews Josh archived

      The production of these in mass has been delayed a number of times. I've been told with good confidence that there should be a bunch coming out soon, fingers crossed as it really is a solid tyre (I've tested it in winter conditions now which will be out later this year, but it is very good)

      #10515
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.