Menu

RoadX RXMOTION U11 Test Results

2024 1 publication

Tested 1 times by independent publications, the RoadX RXMOTION U11 averages a finish of 6th.

  • 1Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 6thAverage finish
  • 0%Field beaten on average
  • 1Publications
RoadX RXMOTION U11

1 test in 2024

The latest test

2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test P6 of 6

RoadX RXMotion U11 finished last, with notable weaknesses in wet performance. The tyre needed 37.7m to stop in wet conditions and posted the slowest wet handling lap at 89.26s. Its only real strength was dry handling, where it performed better than expected for a budget option. The tyre's low price point reflects its position as an economy option with significant performance compromises.

Weak: Dry Braking, Dry Handling, Subj. Dry Handling, Wet Braking, Wet Handling, Subj. Wet Handling, Wet Circle, Straight Aqua, Curved Aquaplaning, Noise, Rolling Resistance Winner: Continental MaxContact MC7

Record by discipline

Where the RoadX RXMOTION U11 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.

Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 1 P6 of 6 0% -
Dry Handling 1 P5 of 6 20% -
Subj. Dry Handling 1 P5 of 6 20% -
Wet
Wet Braking 1 P6 of 6 0% -
Wet Handling 1 P6 of 6 0% -
Subj. Wet Handling 1 P6 of 6 0% -
Wet Circle 1 P6 of 6 0% -
Straight Aqua 1 P6 of 6 0% -
Curved Aquaplaning 1 P6 of 6 0% -
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 1 P3 of 6 60% -
Noise 1 P6 of 6 0% -
Value
Rolling Resistance 1 P6 of 6 0% -

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 1 tests. Updated October 28, 2026.

The RoadX RXMOTION U11 finished last of six in the 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test. Wet performance was its main weakness: braking required 37.7 metres, 28.7% behind the best, while the 89.26-second wet handling lap was 11.5% slower than the quickest. It also ranked last for subjective wet handling, wet circle grip and both aquaplaning disciplines. These results support the testers' description of significant wet-weather compromises rather than a tyre with only one isolated weak result.

Dry handling was better than the testers expected from a budget tyre, but fifth of six on time and subjectively still left it behind most rivals. Dry braking was last at 39.9 metres, 17.4% behind the best. Subjective comfort was a relative positive, third of six, although noise was last and rolling resistance also ranked last, 11.9% behind the best. Its low price therefore came with broad performance limitations in this particular comparison. With only one independent test, dry handling should be treated as a relative improvement over its own weaker results, not evidence that it matches the stronger UHP tyres.

Performance Strengths

  • Dry handling Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • 2024 TopTireReview found it better than expected for a budget tyre, but it remained 5th of 6 on time and subjectively.
  • Ride comfort Minor
    Details
    • 3rd of 6 subjectively, 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test.

Performance Weaknesses

  • Wet braking Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Last of 6 at 37.7 metres, 28.7% behind the best, 2024 TopTireReview Asia test.
  • Wet handling Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Last of 6 on time and subjectively; lap time 11.5% behind the best, 2024 TopTireReview Asia test.
  • Aquaplaning resistance Minor
    Details
    • Last of 6 in straight-line and curved aquaplaning, 2024 TopTireReview Asia test.
  • Dry braking Minor
    Details
    • Last of 6 at 39.9 metres, 17.4% behind the best, 2024 TopTireReview Asia test.
  • Rolling resistance Minor
    Details
    • Last of 6, 11.9% behind the best, 2024 TopTireReview Asia test.

Every test, newest first 1

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2024 1 test
P6 of 6 Beat 0% of the field

2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test

TopTireReview 235/45 R18

RoadX RXMotion U11 finished last, with notable weaknesses in wet performance. The tyre needed 37.7m to stop in wet conditions and posted the slowest wet handling lap at 89.26s. Its only real strength was dry handling, where it performed better than expected for a budget option. The tyre's low price point reflects its position as an economy option with significant performance compromises.

WeakDry BrakingDry HandlingSubj. Dry HandlingWet BrakingWet HandlingSubj. Wet HandlingWet CircleStraight AquaCurved AquaplaningNoiseRolling Resistance WinnerContinental MaxContact MC7

Back to the RoadX RXMOTION U11 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All RoadX tyres

Overview

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.