Menu

Triangle Effexwinter Test Results

2025 1 publication

Tested 1 times by independent publications, the Triangle Effexwinter averages a finish of 7th.

  • 1Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 7thAverage finish
  • 33%Field beaten on average
  • 1Publications

1 test in 2025

The latest test

2025 AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test P7 of 10

The Triangle EffeXWinter TW421 represents the cheapest option in this test at just 87.50 euros per tyre, but significant performance compromises accompany that low price. On snow, the tyre manages acceptable grip levels though it becomes unstable in borderline conditions and exhibits sensitive responses to load changes that score only 12/30 for driving safety - not confidence-inspiring when conditions deteriorate. In wet weather, it delivers the second-best braking result surprisingly, and drives with pleasingly stable characteristics scoring 30/45 for safety, showing that budget tyres can perform respectably in some areas. Dry performance reveals the best exterior noise result at 70.3 dB(A) and strong braking, though the handling suffers from instability during load changes scoring 13/30 for safety. The tyre's environmental credentials are poor with high wear of 0.223 mm per 1000 km, short projected life of only 27,500 km, and the shortest actual lifespan in the test. While it offers the lowest cost per kilometer at 3.18 euros, this calculation doesn't account for the safety compromises. The Triangle might suit extremely budget-conscious buyers in regions with minimal winter conditions, but its unpredictable handling and poor durability make it difficult to recommend.

Strong: Dry Braking, Subj. Comfort, Noise, Value Weak: Dry Handling, Subj. Dry Handling, Wet Circle, Snow Handling, Subj. Snow Handling, Snow Circle, Wear, Abrasion Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

Record by discipline

Where the Triangle Effexwinter finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 1 P2 of 10 89% -
Dry Handling 1 P10 of 10 0% -
Subj. Dry Handling 1 P10 of 10 0% -
Wet
Wet Braking 1 P7 of 10 33% -
Wet Handling 1 P8 of 10 22% -
Subj. Wet Handling 1 P8 of 10 22% -
Wet Circle 1 P9 of 10 11% -
Straight Aqua 1 P8 of 10 22% -
Snow
Snow Braking 1 P5 of 10 56% -
Snow Traction 1 P6 of 10 44% -
Snow Handling 1 P10 of 10 0% -
Subj. Snow Handling 1 P10 of 10 0% -
Snow Circle 1 P9 of 10 11% -
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 1 P1 of 10 100% 1
Noise 1 P1 of 10 100% 1
Value
Wear 1 P10 of 10 0% -
Value 1 P1 of 10 100% 1
Rolling Resistance 1 P3 of 10 78% -
Abrasion 1 P10 of 10 0% -

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 1 tests. Updated October 28, 2026.

The Triangle Effexwinter finished seventh of ten in the 2025 Auto Zeitung AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test, combining short dry braking and low noise with weak handling and short projected life. Dry braking was second, only 0.9% longer than the best, while measured exterior noise and subjective comfort both ranked first. It was also the cheapest tyre to buy and per kilometre, and rolling resistance was third. These benefits explain some appeal at its low price, but do not amount to a consistent performance advantage.

Dry and snow handling were last both on time and subjectively, with testers criticising instability during load changes and near the grip limit. Snow braking was fifth, just 2.3% behind the best, so the snow handling deficit was more pronounced than its straight-line stopping gap. Projected life was last at 27,500 km, with the highest abrasion. Wet handling was eighth, and measured wet braking was seventh, 8.4% behind the best. That conflicts with the written verdict calling wet braking second-best; the measured result does not support treating it as a leading strength. This single test shows useful noise, price and dry-braking results alongside substantial handling and wear compromises.

Performance Strengths

  • Dry braking Minor
    Details
    • 2nd of 10, 0.9% longer than best, 2025 Auto Zeitung AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test.
  • Road noise Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • 1st of 10, 70.3 dB, 2025 Auto Zeitung AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test.
  • Ride comfort Minor
    Details
    • 1st of 10 subjective comfort, 2025 Auto Zeitung AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test.
  • Value for money Minor
    Details
    • Cheapest purchase price and 1st of 10 cost per 1000 km, 2025 Auto Zeitung AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test.
  • Rolling resistance Minor
    Details
    • 3rd of 10, 7.9% behind best, 2025 Auto Zeitung AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test.

Performance Weaknesses

  • Dry handling Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Last of 10 for lap time and subjective feel; load-change instability criticised, 2025 Auto Zeitung AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test.
  • Snow handling Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Last of 10 for lap time and subjective feel, 8.4% behind best on time, 2025 Auto Zeitung AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test.
  • Tread life Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Last of 10 projected mileage, 27,500 km, and highest abrasion, 0.223 mm/1000 km, 2025 Auto Zeitung AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test.

Every test, newest first 1

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2025 1 test
P7 of 10 Beat 33% of the field

2025 AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test

Auto Zeitung 245/45 R19

The Triangle EffeXWinter TW421 represents the cheapest option in this test at just 87.50 euros per tyre, but significant performance compromises accompany that low price. On snow, the tyre manages acceptable grip levels though it becomes unstable in borderline conditions and exhibits sensitive responses to load changes that score only 12/30 for driving safety - not confidence-inspiring when conditions deteriorate. In wet weather, it delivers the second-best braking result surprisingly, and drives with pleasingly stable characteristics scoring 30/45 for safety, showing that budget tyres can perform respectably in some areas. Dry performance reveals the best exterior noise result at 70.3 dB(A) and strong braking, though the handling suffers from instability during load changes scoring 13/30 for safety. The tyre's environmental credentials are poor with high wear of 0.223 mm per 1000 km, short projected life of only 27,500 km, and the shortest actual lifespan in the test. While it offers the lowest cost per kilometer at 3.18 euros, this calculation doesn't account for the safety compromises. The Triangle might suit extremely budget-conscious buyers in regions with minimal winter conditions, but its unpredictable handling and poor durability make it difficult to recommend.

StrongDry BrakingSubj. ComfortNoiseValue WeakDry HandlingSubj. Dry HandlingWet CircleSnow HandlingSubj. Snow HandlingSnow CircleWearAbrasion WinnerGoodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

Back to the Triangle Effexwinter overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Triangle tyres

Overview

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.