Menu

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2

In this article we will be looking at independent tyre test data, and real world driver reviews of the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 to find out which tyre is best for your own driving.

There are a few basic differences between the two tyres. The Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 is an Touring All-Season tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars, and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is an Premium-Touring All-Season tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars

4-SeasonDrive-X5 VS Kinergy-4S2

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been two tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of two total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Hankook Kinergy 4S2one
one wins
one draws in one tests

While it might look like the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is better than the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Dry Braking

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 stopped the vehicle in 4.71% less distance than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
38.4M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
40.3M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
38.6M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
41.3M (+2.7M)
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
38.2M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
39.3M (+1.1M)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 0.52% faster around a lap than the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
96.3Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
96.8Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
100.5Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
100.3Km/H (-0.2Km/H)
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
92.1Km/H (-1.2Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
93.3Km/H

Wet Braking

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 stopped the vehicle in 3.41% less distance than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
53.9M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
55.8M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
47.4M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
49.2M (+1.8M)
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
60.4M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
62.4M (+2M)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 was 0.07% faster around a wet lap than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
76.2Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
76.15Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
71.1Km/H (-1.3Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
72.4Km/H
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
81.3Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
79.9Km/H (-1.4Km/H)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 performed equally well in wet circle tests.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
14.19s
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
14.19s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Both tyres performed equally well

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
12.07s (+0.04s)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
12.03s
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
16.31s
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
16.34s (+0.03s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one straight aqua tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 floated at a 0.35% higher speed than the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
71.55Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
71.8Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
68.8Km/H (-1.3Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
70.1Km/H
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
74.3Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
73.5Km/H (-0.8Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 slipped out at a 9.63% higher speed than the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
2.44m/sec2
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2.7m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
2.47m/sec2 (-0.36m/sec2)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2.83m/sec2
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
2.4m/sec2 (-0.17m/sec2)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2.57m/sec2

Snow Braking

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during two snow braking tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 stopped the vehicle in 5.42% less distance than the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
24.9M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
23.55M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
24.8M (+0.7M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
24.1M
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
25M (+2M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
23M

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 had 1.12% better snow traction than the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
3057.5N
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3092N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
2798N (-19N)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2817N
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
3317N (-50N)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3367N

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 0.07% faster around a lap than the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
75.75Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
75.8Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
51.5Km/H (-0.1Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
51.6Km/H
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
100Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
100Km/H

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 provided 0.27% more lateral grip than the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
3.65ms/2
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.66ms/2
Lateral snow grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Snow Circle: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
3.65ms/2 (-0.01ms/2)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.66ms/2

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 1.27% faster through a slalom than the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
3.89m/sec2
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.94m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
3.89m/sec2 (-0.05m/sec2)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.94m/sec2

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
7.3 Points
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
7.3 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tyres performed equally well

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
7.3 Points
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
7.3 Points

Noise

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one noise tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 measured 0.96% quieter than the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
73.25dB
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
72.55dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
72.8dB
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
73.3dB (+0.5dB)
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
73.7dB (+1.9dB)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
71.8dB

Wear

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one wear tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is predicted to cover 9.04% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
52850KM
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
58100KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
52850KM (-5250KM)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
58100KM

Value

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 was better during one value tests. On average the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 proved to have a 9.3% better value based on price/1000km than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
6.24Price/1000
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
6.88Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
6.24Price/1000
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
6.88Price/1000 (+0.64Price/1000)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 had a 3.29% lower rolling resistance than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
7.65kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
7.91kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
7.86kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.31kg / t (+0.45kg / t)
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
7.44kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
7.51kg / t (+0.07kg / t)

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 lost 16.19% less particle wear matter than the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5.

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
1056g
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
885g
Total weight loss after wear test in grams, lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
1056g (+171g)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
885g

Real World Driver Reviews

Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 and Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

In total the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tyre 0% overall.

The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 has been reviewed 59 times and drivers have given the tyre 75% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Best Review for the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
View all Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Given 81% 205/55 R16 on a combination of roads for 3,000 average miles
Very good all round tire
Helpful 1385 - tyre reviewed on August 20, 2020
View all Hankook Kinergy 4S2 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

In conclusion the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 performed better in dry braking, wet braking, wet handling [km/h], value and rolling resistance, while the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 performed better in dry handling [km/h], straight aqua, curved aquaplaning, snow braking, snow traction, snow handling [km/h], snow circle, snow slalom, noise, wear and abrasion.

Interestingly, both tyres performed equally well in dry handling, wet handling, wet circle, snow handling and subj. comfort, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.

Which tyre is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tyre. Comparing all the data in the tyre reviews database, on balance Hankook Kinergy 4S2 seems to be the best tyre overall.

However, it's important to note that both tyres have their strengths.

Remember, the best tyre for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Overall Winner: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.