Menu

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Linglong Sport Master 4S

The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Linglong Sport Master 4S represent two very different approaches to the modern all-season tyre. Continental's premium-touring tyre is designed as a balanced year-round solution with a strong winter safety margin, while Linglong's touring-focused Sport Master 4S aims to deliver surprisingly capable dry and wet-road performance at a more accessible price point.
AllSeasonContact-2 VS Sport-Master-4S

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been three tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of three total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Continental AllSeasonContact 2three
three wins

While it might look like the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is better than the Linglong Sport Master 4S purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Excellent all-round consistency across dry, wet, and snow conditions
  • Outstanding snow performance, especially traction and braking
  • Low rolling resistance in all shared tests, supporting efficiency
  • Comfortable and refined, with generally lower noise than the Linglong
  • Very strong dry braking, beating the Continental in all three tests
  • Competitive dry handling, including excellent subjective dry feel in the Tyre Reviews test
  • Attractive value proposition with a notably lower price-per-1000km result
  • Good comfort and, in one test, lower noise than the Continental

Dry Braking

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S stopped the vehicle in 5.66% less distance than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
40.67M
Linglong Sport Master 4S
38.37M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Linglong Sport Master 4S

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
41.9M (+1.8M)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
40.1M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
41.5M (+3.3M)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
38.2M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
38.6M (+1.8M)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
36.8M

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 0.41% faster around a lap than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
53.93s
Linglong Sport Master 4S
54.15s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
53.93s
Linglong Sport Master 4S
54.15s (+0.22s)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 0.05% faster around a lap than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
101.85Km/H
Linglong Sport Master 4S
101.8Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
101.1Km/H
Linglong Sport Master 4S
100.9Km/H (-0.2Km/H)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
102.6Km/H (-0.1Km/H)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
102.7Km/H

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Linglong Sport Master 4S performed equally well in subj. dry handling tests.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
10 Points
Linglong Sport Master 4S
10 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Both tyres performed equally well

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
10 Points
Linglong Sport Master 4S
10 Points

Wet Braking

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 2.13% less distance than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
40.48M
Linglong Sport Master 4S
41.36M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
31.9M
Linglong Sport Master 4S
32.9M (+1M)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
44.9M
Linglong Sport Master 4S
47.5M (+2.6M)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
44.65M (+0.98M)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
43.67M

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 3.98% faster around a wet lap than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
86.9s
Linglong Sport Master 4S
90.5s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
86.9s
Linglong Sport Master 4S
90.5s (+3.6s)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 2.68% faster around a wet lap than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
76.4Km/H
Linglong Sport Master 4S
74.35Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
74.7Km/H
Linglong Sport Master 4S
70.4Km/H (-4.3Km/H)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
78.1Km/H (-0.2Km/H)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
78.3Km/H

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 20% more points than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
10 Points
Linglong Sport Master 4S
8 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
10 Points
Linglong Sport Master 4S
8 Points (-2 Points)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 3.11% faster around a wet circle than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
11.82s
Linglong Sport Master 4S
12.2s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
11.82s
Linglong Sport Master 4S
12.2s (+0.38s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 floated at a 2.56% higher speed than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
76.45Km/H
Linglong Sport Master 4S
74.49Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
76.8Km/H (-0.5Km/H)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
77.3Km/H
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
72.5Km/H
Linglong Sport Master 4S
70.9Km/H (-1.6Km/H)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
80.05Km/H
Linglong Sport Master 4S
75.26Km/H (-4.79Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 slipped out at a 1.45% higher speed than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
2.75m/sec2
Linglong Sport Master 4S
2.71m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
2.68m/sec2 (-0.23m/sec2)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
2.91m/sec2
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
2.72m/sec2
Linglong Sport Master 4S
2.68m/sec2 (-0.04m/sec2)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
2.86m/sec2
Linglong Sport Master 4S
2.55m/sec2 (-0.31m/sec2)

Snow Braking

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during three snow braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 11.88% less distance than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
23.15M
Linglong Sport Master 4S
26.27M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
20.25M
Linglong Sport Master 4S
20.9M (+0.65M)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
23.9M
Linglong Sport Master 4S
29.9M (+6M)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
25.3M
Linglong Sport Master 4S
28M (+2.7M)

Snow Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 accelerated 13.71% faster than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
4.72s
Linglong Sport Master 4S
5.47s
Snow acceleration time, lower is better

Best In Snow Traction: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
4.72s
Linglong Sport Master 4S
5.47s (+0.75s)

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had 14.2% better snow traction than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
2930N
Linglong Sport Master 4S
2513.95N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
2951N
Linglong Sport Master 4S
2481N (-470N)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
2909N
Linglong Sport Master 4S
2546.9N (-362.1N)

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 3.63% faster around a lap than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
87.5s
Linglong Sport Master 4S
90.8s
Snow handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
87.5s
Linglong Sport Master 4S
90.8s (+3.3s)

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 7.41% faster around a lap than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
56.42Km/H
Linglong Sport Master 4S
52.24Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
52.6Km/H
Linglong Sport Master 4S
49.4Km/H (-3.2Km/H)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
60.23Km/H
Linglong Sport Master 4S
55.08Km/H (-5.15Km/H)

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 5.26% more points than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
9.5 Points
Linglong Sport Master 4S
9 Points
Subjective Snow Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
9.5 Points
Linglong Sport Master 4S
9 Points (-0.5 Points)

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 provided 11.17% more lateral grip than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
3.76ms/2
Linglong Sport Master 4S
3.34ms/2
Lateral snow grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Snow Circle: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
3.76ms/2
Linglong Sport Master 4S
3.34ms/2 (-0.42ms/2)

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 8.26% faster through a slalom than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
4.36m/sec2
Linglong Sport Master 4S
4m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
4.36m/sec2
Linglong Sport Master 4S
4m/sec2 (-0.36m/sec2)

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two subj. comfort tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 4.86% more points than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
8.65 Points
Linglong Sport Master 4S
8.23 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
10 Points
Linglong Sport Master 4S
9.75 Points (-0.25 Points)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
7.3 Points
Linglong Sport Master 4S
6.7 Points (-0.6 Points)

Noise

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during one noise tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S measured 0.26% quieter than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
72.44dB
Linglong Sport Master 4S
72.25dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Linglong Sport Master 4S

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
72.6dB (+2dB)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
70.6dB
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
72dB
Linglong Sport Master 4S
73.1dB (+1.1dB)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
72.73dB
Linglong Sport Master 4S
73.06dB (+0.33dB)

Wear

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one wear tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is predicted to cover 8.63% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
48650KM
Linglong Sport Master 4S
44450KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
48650KM
Linglong Sport Master 4S
44450KM (-4200KM)

Value

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during one value tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S proved to have a 27.85% better value based on price/1000km than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
9.66Price/1000
Linglong Sport Master 4S
6.97Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Linglong Sport Master 4S

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
9.66Price/1000 (+2.69Price/1000)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
6.97Price/1000

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had a 12.58% lower rolling resistance than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
7.99kg / t
Linglong Sport Master 4S
9.14kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
7.73kg / t
Linglong Sport Master 4S
8.93kg / t (+1.2kg / t)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
8.35kg / t
Linglong Sport Master 4S
9.56kg / t (+1.21kg / t)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
7.88kg / t
Linglong Sport Master 4S
8.93kg / t (+1.05kg / t)

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S lost 7.47% less particle wear matter than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
1125g
Linglong Sport Master 4S
1041g
Total weight loss after wear test in grams, lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Linglong Sport Master 4S

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
1125g (+84g)
Linglong Sport Master 4S
1041g

Real World Driver Reviews

Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Linglong Sport Master 4S.

In total the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has been reviewed 50 times and drivers have given the tyre 81% overall.

The Linglong Sport Master 4S has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tyre 0% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Best Review for the Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Given 88% 225/40 R18 on a combination of roads for 50 spirited miles
Compared to my previous premium summer tyres, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is incredibly quiet and has fantastic grip. I am driving a plug-in hybrid Audi A3, and it became basically silent in fully electric mode. I always had wheelspin when I accelerated a little harder, because of the instant torque of the electric motor. What fascinates me is that this happened with both Bridgestone and Vredestein summer tyres in warm, dry weather conditions. This is no longer the case with the ASC2. The rolling resistance also feels much better, the car coasts so effortlessly. Power consumption... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1705 - tyre reviewed on November 2, 2023
View all Continental AllSeasonContact 2 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Linglong Sport Master 4S
View all Linglong Sport Master 4S driver reviews >>

Conclusion

Across the three shared tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is the clear overall winner, taking all three head-to-head test rankings and consistently finishing near the very top of the field: 1st of 12, 2nd of 17, and 2nd of 11. Its advantage is not based on one standout discipline but on breadth: it is stronger in snow braking, snow traction, snow handling, wet stability, comfort, rolling resistance, and in one test also wear. The biggest real-world gap appears in winter use, where Continental's snow traction advantage reached 18.94% in AutoBild's 225/40 R18 test and its snow braking advantage reached 20.07%.
Key Differences
  • Continental dominated the overall results, beating the Linglong in all three shared tests and finishing on or near the podium each time.
  • Linglong was consistently stronger in dry braking, winning all three dry braking comparisons, with advantages ranging from 4.3% to 7.95%.
  • Continental was substantially better on snow, winning every snow braking, snow traction, and snow handling comparison across the shared data.
  • Wet performance generally favoured Continental, especially in the 225/40 R18 AutoBild test where it stopped 2.6 metres shorter in the wet and was 6.11% faster in wet handling.
  • Continental had a clear rolling-resistance advantage in all three tests, suggesting better efficiency and potentially lower fuel or energy consumption.
  • Linglong's value proposition is its main counterargument: it offered a much better price-per-1000km figure in the AutoBild test and also showed lower abrasion in that dataset.
Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Overall Winner: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:

Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tyres