Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
The data shows a consistent pattern. Goodyear regularly tops overall rankings (four test wins) with standout wear, noise, efficiency, and balanced dry/wet grip. Kumho sprinkles in category wins-especially wet braking and aquaplaning-and even places ahead in one large shootout, underlining its speed-per-pound appeal. The result is a nuanced choice between all-round refinement and value-driven performance.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | four | |
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | one |
While it might look like the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is better than the Kumho Ecsta PS71 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Outstanding longevity and lowest cost per 1,000 km (e.g., 54,020-63,200 km; €6.66-€8.70/1,000 km)
- Class-leading refinement: quieter pass-by noise and better rolling resistance
- Balanced dry and wet grip with superior dry handling and reliable wet control
- Consistent top test results and strong environmental scores (low abrasion, efficient fuel use)
- Excellent wet braking in multiple tests (e.g., 27.4 m vs 28.3 m; +3%)
- Very good straight-line aquaplaning resistance (often best-in-group)
- Convincing wet handling dynamics and secure overall behavior
- Lower purchase price with strong price-performance in selected tests
Dry Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 1.9% less distance than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Dry Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.99% faster around a lap than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 0.89% less distance than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Wet Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 0.56% less distance than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.87% faster around a wet lap than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.07% faster around a wet circle than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 floated at a 1% higher speed than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Straight Aqua: Kumho Ecsta PS71
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 slipped out at a 4.71% higher speed than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and Kumho Ecsta PS71 performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three noise tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 measured 3.84% quieter than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Noise: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three wear tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is predicted to cover 29.6% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Wear: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three value tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 proved to have a 17.67% better value based on price/1000km than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Value: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during one price tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 cost 12.73% less than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Price: Kumho Ecsta PS71
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had a 1.62% lower rolling resistance than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 used 1.75% less fuel than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 emitted 13.42% less particle wear matter than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Abrasion: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Driver Reviews
Across 160 driver reviews, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely praised for outstanding dry and wet grip, progressive and predictable handling, strong braking, and a surprisingly comfortable, quiet ride for a UHP tyre. Many users report improved confidence and everyday refinement versus previous tyres (including PS4/PS5, PZ4, and various runflats), with good value for money also noted. Minority complaints focus on faster wear and relatively low new tread depth, increased noise on rough asphalt, and a softer sidewall feel that can dull initial turn-in or feel floaty at higher speeds. Overall sentiment is strongly positive for performance-focused daily use.
Based on 173 reviews with an average rating of 86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Kumho Ecsta PS71 positively for strong wet and dry grip, predictable handling, and good value, often comparing it favorably to pricier premium options. Noise and faster wear appear as the main trade-offs, with several reports of increased road noise over time and below-average tread life for some vehicles. A minority report balancing/'egg-shaped' defects and tramlining, but these are not universal. Overall, the PS71 is a well-liked mid-range UHP tyre focused on grip and value.
Based on 82 reviews with an average rating of 78%
I have now had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's, Goodyear Eagle F1 Supersports, Michelin PS4 and even some Avon's (for a brief period) on my current car - a Golf GTI Clubsport 40.
I mix up my driving a lot - lots of motorway driving but also lots of hard street driving and B road blasts, I find it massively important to have the best tyres possible to allow me to push my car as hard as I can in a safe manner.
I was massively impressed with the Asymmetric 5's, the sheer grip... Continue reading this review using the link below
I've always used kumho because the price well reflects in proformance if only they didn't need constant rebalencing.
I've had 4 duff pairs, ku31 x 2 pair, ku 39 x 2 pair that had to come off in the end they were so bad.
No amount of balencing can sort an egg shape tyre.
These new ps71 are very soft, squishy, feel like running on 20psi with 30g wheel wobble even after twice rebalencing them & 1 of them is egg shape.
I am worn out with trying to get them right & think after years of kumho on... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
Kumho delivers flashes of excellence: quicker wet stops in several tests, strong wet handling, and best-in-group straight aquaplaning in two 2025 programs. However, it's noisier, wears faster, and shows dry-road imprecision in ADAC. If outright wet braking and a lower upfront price are priorities, it's compelling. For most drivers seeking consistent performance with the lowest total cost of ownership, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is the clear winner.
Key Differences
- Overall results: Goodyear wins 4 tests vs Kumho 1, reflecting broader consistency
- Wear and TCO: Goodyear delivers 28-63% more mileage and lower € per 1,000 km
- Noise: Goodyear is 2.8-5.4% quieter across tests; Kumho is audibly louder
- Dry dynamics: Goodyear more precise with higher dry handling speeds; Kumho can feel less stable on dry (ADAC)
- Wet specialties: Kumho often stops shorter and resists straight aquaplaning better; Goodyear stronger in curved aquaplaning
- Efficiency: Goodyear shows lower rolling resistance and fuel use; Kumho trails slightly
Overall Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.