Viking Fourtech Plus vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
- TR Score
- 8.2/10
- Owners say
- 84% · 1
- TR Score
- 8.1/10
- Owners say
- 81% · 15
The Viking Fourtech Plus and the Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ have met in 2 independent tests and the record is level at 1-1. The Fourtech Plus resisted straight aquaplaning at a 7.4% higher speed; the Quatrac Pro+ stopped 6% shorter in the wet.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus for prioritized safety on wet/dry tarmac, higher-speed road use, and comfort. Choose Viking Fourtech Plus if you often drive in heavy rain, standing water, or mixed winter conditions and want lower running costs on a tighter budget.
Where the Fourtech Plus is stronger
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved wins in both tests)
- Strong snow/ice capability for the class (wins in snow braking/traction and ice braking)
- Lower running costs (better rolling resistance, fuel use, and abrasion)
Where the Quatrac Pro+ is stronger
- Dry 2/3 Stopped 3.5% shorter in the dry (2 tests)
- Comfort 2/3
The measured tallies (wins out of measurements in the shared tests) come straight from the tables below. The written verdict and bullet points are analysis of those tests and of owner reviews; where they and the figures disagree, the figures are right.
Fourtech Plus vs Quatrac Pro+ at a glance
| Category | Fourtech Plus | Gap | Quatrac Pro+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won2 shared tests | 1 | 1 | |
| Dry3 measurements | 1 | The Quatrac Pro+ stopped 3.5% shorter in the dry (2 tests) | 2 |
| Wet9 measurements | 4 | Level between the two. | 4 |
| Snow6 measurements | 5 | The Fourtech Plus stopped 3.2% shorter on snow (2 tests) | 1 |
| Ice1 measurement | 1 | 0 | |
| Comfort3 measurements | 1 | 2 | |
| Value4 measurements | 3 | 1 | |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.2/10 | The Fourtech Plus by 0.1 | 8.1/10 |
| Owner rating1 and 15 reviews | 84% | The Fourtech Plus by 3 points | 81% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 51 | 26 sizes made in both | 103 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 2 tests in 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Fourtech Plus | Field | Quatrac Pro+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Auto Bild Sports Car All Season Tyre Test | P9 of 10 | P7 of 10 | |
| 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | P8 of 16 | P9 of 16 |
Performance profile
7 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Fourtech Plus
Quatrac Pro+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 12 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Fourtech Plus
Quatrac Pro+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Fourtech Plus | Gap | Quatrac Pro+ | Wins | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45 | 3.5% | 43.4 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 91.5 | 1% | 90.6 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 41.75 | 6% | 38.95 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 39.7 | = | 39.7 | 0-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 71.2 | 5.8% | 75.3 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 14.92 | 2.7% | 14.52 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 76.6 | 7.4% | 71.35 | 2-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 2.52 | 11.6% | 2.25 | 2-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 16.9 | 3.2% | 17.65 | 2-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 1,474 | 0.7% | 1,471 | 2-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 53.5 | 0.6% | 53.8 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 3.8 | 1.1% | 3.76 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 15.7 | 4.8% | 16.5 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 10% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 70.6 | = | 70.6 | 1-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 44,800 | 3.8% | 46,500 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 8.4 | 3.4% | 8.7 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 5.7 | 1.7% | 5.8 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 69 | 11.5% | 78 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Fourtech Plus scores 8.2 and the Quatrac Pro+ 8.1 out of 10.
| Fourtech Plus | Category | Quatrac Pro+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | Dry | 50 | ||
| 78 | Wet | 79 | ||
| 30 | Comfort | 66 | ||
| 56 | Value | 27 | ||
| 61 | Snow | 38 | ||
| 26 | Ice | 8 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Fourtech Plus | Category | Quatrac Pro+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Dry Grip | 8.8 | ||
| 8 | Wet Grip | 8.9 | ||
| 8 | Road Feedback | 8.7 | ||
| 8 | Handling | 8.4 | ||
| - | Wear | 7.1 | ||
| 9 | Comfort | 8.1 | ||
| 10 | Snow Grip | 7.6 | ||
| 8 | Ice Grip | 6.8 | ||
Owners rate the Fourtech Plus 84% from 1 reviews and the Quatrac Pro+ 81% from 15. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Viking Fourtech Plus
- 84%from 1 reviews
- 1,000 milesdriven by reviewers
All 1 Fourtech Plus reviewsA good all season tyre with excellent braking and grip on snow, like a winter tyre. High comfort and low noise.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
- 81%from 15 reviews
- 79%would buy again
- 98,850 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners are broadly pleased with the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus, with 12 of 14 reviews scoring it positively and an average owner rating of 80.9%. The most consistent strengths are strong wet grip and reassuring all-round traction, with many also highlighting confident dry grip and capable performance in snow. A meaningful minority (around one in five) report a softer, less precise steering feel and a tyre that needs a longer bedding-in period, and a similar share raise concerns over tread life or durability.
- Excellent wet grip, even in cold and wet conditions
- Strong dry grip with confidence for spirited driving
- Surprisingly capable snow traction
- Predictable dry handling
- Softer, less precise steering feel/feedback
- Noticeable bedding-in period before it feels at its best
- Reduced margin at the limit or a slight delay finding grip under load
Summarised by AI from 14 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 15 Quatrac Pro+ reviews"I purchased these all-season premium tires for my 4WD Subaru Outback, and I am extremely satisfied with them. As soon as they were installed, the car felt remarkably smooth and pleasant to drive.
The tires are wearing perfectly evenly, and I’ve already rotated them once. I used to be hesitant about all-season tires, but this brand completely convinced me that I made the right choice. While tire selection always depends on the specific car, driving style, and usage, these have worked out incredibly well for my Outback. Highly recommended!
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 51 sizes of the Fourtech Plus and 103 of the Quatrac Pro+, 26 of them made in both.
| Category | Fourtech Plus | Quatrac Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 51 sizes, 13 to 19 inch | 103 sizes, 17 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 26 sizes 205/45 R17205/50 R17205/55 R17215/45 R17215/50 R17215/55 R17215/60 R17225/45 R17225/50 R17225/55 R17225/60 R17235/55 R17and 14 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B70%C30% | B99%C1% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C59%D41% | C64%B20%D15%E1% |
| EU label noise | 71-72 dB B100% | 70-75 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 56 of 56 | 139 of 139 |
| On the market since | 2022 | 2023 |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head pits two European all-season touring options with distinct personalities: the budget-friendly Viking Fourtech Plus (Continental's value brand) versus the performance-leaning Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus. Both target year-round convenience on passenger cars, but they trade strengths in critical areas.
Across two 2025 tests (Auto Bild Sports Car 225/45 R18 and ADAC 225/45 R17), Vredestein consistently stops shorter on dry and wet roads, while Viking counters with class-leading aquaplaning resistance and surprisingly solid snow/ice metrics for its price. Comfort, precision, and subjective feel lean Vredestein; efficiency and aquaplaning security lean Viking.
Conclusion
The Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus is the safer bet for drivers prioritizing wet and dry stopping and a more polished drive. It delivered notably shorter wet braking (up to ~10% shorter at Auto Bild) and better wet handling, plus superior subjective comfort and slightly better wear. Its drawback is only adequate precision on dry roads, but its braking advantage is meaningful for everyday safety.
The Viking Fourtech Plus trades some wet and dry braking performance for standout aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved wins in both tests), strong snow/ice braking and traction, and lower running costs (better rolling resistance, fuel use, and abrasion). If you face heavy rain, slush, or mixed winter conditions at a value price, Viking is compelling-just be mindful of its longer wet/dry stops and average steering precision.
Fourtech Plus vs Quatrac Pro+: your questions
Is the Viking Fourtech Plus or the Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ the better tyre?
The Viking Fourtech Plus and the Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ have met in 2 independent tests and the record is level at 1-1. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Fourtech Plus scores 8.2 and the Quatrac Pro+ 8.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Fourtech Plus or the Quatrac Pro+?
Across the shared tests the wet measurements are split 4-4 between the Fourtech Plus and the Quatrac Pro+.
Which is better in the dry?
The Quatrac Pro+ led 2 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.5% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Fourtech Plus led 5 of the 6 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.2% shorter on snow across 2 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 9/10 for the Fourtech Plus and 8.1/10 for the Quatrac Pro+.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Fourtech Plus 84% from 1 reviews and the Quatrac Pro+ 81% from 15.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Fourtech Plus is made in 51 sizes (13 to 19 inch) and the Quatrac Pro+ in 103 (17 to 22 inch). 26 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Fourtech Plus is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Quatrac Pro+ B and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Quatrac Pro+ is the newer design: it reached the market in 2023, the Fourtech Plus in 2022.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
9-0 in 9 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
7-0 in 7 shared tests
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
8-0 in 8 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Viking Fourtech Plus
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs
Nokian Seasonproof 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
2-0 in 2 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion