Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 finished ahead 2 times and the Z 107 ZuperEco not once. The EcoControl HP2 was stronger in dry and wet.
Performance profile
Their shared tests recorded too few of the same measurements to chart, so the chart starts from each tyre's Tyre Reviews Score categories: its whole record, not shared tests.
Where each scores higher
EcoControl HP2
Z 107 ZuperEco
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
EcoControl HP2
Z 107 ZuperEco
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the EcoControl HP2 85% from 5 reviews and the Z 107 ZuperEco 66% from 6. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | EcoControl HP2 | Gap | Z 107 ZuperEco | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry EcoControl HP2 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 36.4 | 2.5% | 37.35 | 2-0 |
| Wet EcoControl HP2 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 31.65 | 2.4% | 32.4 | 2-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 2 tests, 2021 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | EcoControl HP2 | Field | Z 107 ZuperEco |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview | P16 of 55 | P24 of 55 | |
| 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test | P20 of 53 | P24 of 53 |
EcoControl HP2 vs Z 107 ZuperEco: your questions
Is the Fulda EcoControl HP2 or the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco the better tyre?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 finished ahead 2 times and the Z 107 ZuperEco not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the EcoControl HP2 scores 8.2 and the Z 107 ZuperEco 6.7 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the EcoControl HP2 or the Z 107 ZuperEco?
The EcoControl HP2 led 2 of the 2 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.4% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The EcoControl HP2 led 2 of the 2 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.5% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.4/10 for the EcoControl HP2 and 8.6/10 for the Z 107 ZuperEco.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the EcoControl HP2 85% from 5 reviews and the Z 107 ZuperEco 66% from 6. 80% of EcoControl HP2 owners would buy it again, against 83% for the Z 107 ZuperEco.
More comparisons with these tyres
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.