Menu

Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco

The Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.2
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
75%
Wet Grip
70%
Road Feedback
25%
Handling
50%
Wear
75%
Comfort
80%
Buy again
90%
2 Reviews
66% Average
11,600 miles driven
6 Tests (avg: 19th)
Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco

Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco

Summer Budget
BETA
7.2 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
74.4
0.32x / 3 tests
Value
73.8
0.42x / 6 tests
Wet
58.2
2x / 14 tests
Dry
52.9
1.8x / 8 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
57.2
12 tests
Handling
46.1
5 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 6
Publications: 2
Period: 2021 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 2
Avg Rating: 66.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.26
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Teknikens Varld Summer Tyre Test Teknikens Varld 2025 235/55 R19 8/8 4 metrics
2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 41/52 2 metrics
2024 EV Tyre Test Auto Bild 2024 235/55 R19 8/9 13 metrics
2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2024 225/55 R17 10/10 8 metrics
2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2024 205/55 R16 24/55 2 metrics
2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test Auto Bild 2021 205/55 R16 24/53 2 metrics
6
Tests
19th
Average
8th
Best
41st
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
8th/8
The Goodride ZuperEco Z-107, the least expensive tyre in the test by a considerable margin, proved the old adage that "you get what you pay for." While surprisingly competent in comfort metrics and relatively quiet on smooth surfaces, the tyre's critical safety deficiencies were impossible to overlook. It was the only tyre to demonstrate unstable, unpredictable sliding tendencies combined with severe understeer, making the vehicle genuinely difficult to control in emergency situations. Its catastrophic performance in the moose test (7 km/h slower than the next worst tyre) led to a 10-point penalty in the final scoring. Despite some acceptable objective measurements in other categories, the testers strongly advised avoiding this tyre due to its dangerous handling characteristics.
41st/52
24th/55

Questions and Answers for the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

How would you rate the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco Reviews

Given 71% while driving a BMW 116d M Sport (225/40 R18) on mostly country roads for 3,000 average miles
Bought these because we live in a expensive time atm...And to see if chinese tires have evolved since I last had some Sonars on.
Pretty decent tire, overall good.
Would not drive F1 style with them, but for my daily 70km commute they'll serve me great.
Great wear so far.
June 27, 2024
Given 75% while driving a Toyota Corolla AE101 (165/70 R14) on mostly country roads for 8,600 average miles
This tyre made the same by three brands. Goodride, Westlake and Trazano. Very good in dry roads, and also good in the wet. Brake is good. Very comfort and good wear.
February 13, 2024
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Rate the Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco