Menu

2024 EV Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
8 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Dry
  3. Wet
  4. Comfort
  5. Value
  6. Results
  7. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
  8. Continental PremiumContact 7
  9. Hankook iON evo SUV
  10. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
  11. Falken e.Ziex
  12. GT Radial Sport Active 2 EV
  13. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
  14. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
  15. Michelin Pilot Sport EV

The Auto Bild 2024 summer tyre test for electric vehicles (EVs) in the 235/55 R19 size aimed to compare the performance of standard and specialized EV tyres to determine if EV-specific tyres offer significant advantages over their conventional counterparts. The test included eight tyre models: the Continental PremiumContact 7, Falken e.Ziex [ev specific], Hankook iON evo SUV [ev specific], Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, GT Radial SportActive 2 EV [ev specific], Bridgestone Potenza Sport, and Goodride ZuperEco Z-107.

Test Publication:
235/55 R19 9 tyres 4 categories
Similar Tests
Images courtesy of Auto Bild
Test Publication:
Auto Bild
https://www.autobild.de/ratgeber/reifen/
Images courtesy of Auto Bild
Test Size: 235/55 R19
Tyres Tested: 9 tyres
Test Categories:
4 categories (13 tests)
Similar Tests

Interestingly, Michelin decided not to officially enter their EV-specific tyre, the Pilot Sport EV, or their e-Primacy model in the test, opting instead for the Pilot Sport 4 SUV from their sports tyre segment. Despite this, the discontinued Pilot Sport EV was still tested alongside the other contenders, providing an opportunity to compare its performance against both standard and EV-specific tyres.

The tyres were evaluated on a Kia EV6 electric vehicle across three main categories: Wet Performance (40% weightage), Dry Performance (40% weightage), and Cost (20% weightage). Wet Performance tests included aquaplaning, curved aquaplaning, handling, steering response, and braking. Dry Performance assessed handling, braking, rolling comfort, and pass-by noise. The Cost category considered mileage, price per mileage, rolling resistance, and electricity consumption.

In the final results, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV emerged as the overall winner, receiving an "Exemplary" rating. The Continental PremiumContact 7 and Hankook iON evo SUV tied for second place, also with "Exemplary" ratings. The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 followed closely in fourth place. The test demonstrated that while specialized EV tyres like the Hankook iON evo SUV can offer benefits, high-quality standard tyres such as those from Continental and Michelin can also provide excellent performance on electric vehicles.

As for the Michelin Pilot Sport EV, although it wasn't officially part of the test, its performance in the measured categories suggests it would have likely placed in the lower half of the rankings. The tyre struggled in wet conditions, placing 7th in braking and 8th in both aquaplaning tests. It fared slightly better in dry handling, securing 6th place. However, without complete data across all test criteria, it's difficult to determine its exact position in the final order.

The Auto Bild 2024 summer tyre test for EVs showcases the importance of considering a balance of safety, performance, and efficiency when selecting tyres for electric vehicles. While EV-specific tyres can offer some advantages, the test proves that high-quality standard tyres can also rise to the challenge of providing excellent performance on these technologically advanced vehicles.

Dry

The Hankook iON evo SUV showcased the best dry braking performance, stopping just short of the Continental PremiumContact 7. The GT Radial SportActive 2 EV and Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 required the longest distances to come to a halt.

Dry Braking

Spread: 4.90 M (14.8%)|Avg: 34.78 M
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
  1. Hankook iON evo SUV
    33.00 M
  2. Continental PremiumContact 7
    33.20 M
  3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    33.90 M
  4. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    34.00 M
  5. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    34.10 M
  6. Falken e.Ziex
    34.70 M
  7. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    35.00 M
  8. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    37.20 M
  9. GT Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    37.90 M

Continental PremiumContact 7 demonstrated the most agile and precise handling on dry roads, closely followed by the Michelin's Pilot Sport 4 SUV and Bridgestone Potenza Sport. The Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 and GT Radial SportActive 2 EV struggled to keep up with the leaders in this discipline.

Dry Handling

Spread: 4.20 Km/H (5.9%)|Avg: 69.77 Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
  1. Continental PremiumContact 7
    71.30 Km/H
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    70.90 Km/H
  3. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    70.70 Km/H
  4. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    70.40 Km/H
  5. Hankook iON evo SUV
    70.20 Km/H
  6. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    70.10 Km/H
  7. Falken e.Ziex
    69.60 Km/H
  8. GT Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    67.60 Km/H
  9. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    67.10 Km/H

Wet

In wet braking tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 outperformed the competition, with the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV not far behind. The Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 had the longest braking distance on wet surfaces.

Wet Braking

Spread: 10.40 M (27.6%)|Avg: 41.62 M
Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
  1. Continental PremiumContact 7
    37.70 M
  2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    39.10 M
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    39.20 M
  4. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    39.40 M
  5. Hankook iON evo SUV
    39.40 M
  6. Falken e.Ziex
    42.40 M
  7. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    43.30 M
  8. GT Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    46.00 M
  9. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    48.10 M

The Bridgestone Potenza Sport and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV displayed the best handling characteristics on wet roads, while the Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 was again last.

Wet Handling

Spread: 4.90 Km/H (8.3%)|Avg: 56.97 Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
  1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    59.20 Km/H
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    58.50 Km/H
  3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    58.30 Km/H
  4. Continental PremiumContact 7
    57.60 Km/H
  5. Hankook iON evo SUV
    57.10 Km/H
  6. Falken e.Ziex
    56.30 Km/H
  7. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    56.20 Km/H
  8. GT Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    55.20 Km/H
  9. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    54.30 Km/H

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV had the highest resistance to aquaplaning in straight-line conditions, with most tyres performing similarly well. The Falken e.Ziex was the first to lose grip on the water-covered surface.

Straight Aqua

Spread: 3.40 Km/H (3.6%)|Avg: 94.04 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    95.50 Km/H
  2. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    94.70 Km/H
  3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    94.60 Km/H
  4. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    94.40 Km/H
  5. Hankook iON evo SUV
    94.40 Km/H
  6. GT Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    94.10 Km/H
  7. Continental PremiumContact 7
    93.40 Km/H
  8. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    93.20 Km/H
  9. Falken e.Ziex
    92.10 Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Spread: 0.64 m/sec2 (19.5%)|Avg: 3.03 m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)
  1. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    3.28 m/sec2
  2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    3.27 m/sec2
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    3.25 m/sec2
  4. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    3.24 m/sec2
  5. Hankook iON evo SUV
    2.99 m/sec2
  6. Continental PremiumContact 7
    2.96 m/sec2
  7. Falken e.Ziex
    2.94 m/sec2
  8. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    2.70 m/sec2
  9. GT Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    2.64 m/sec2

Comfort

The Hankook iON evo SUV proved to be the quietest tyre, whereas the Bridgestone Potenza Sport produced the most noise.

Noise

Spread: 2.70 dB (3.9%)|Avg: 70.29 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
  1. Hankook iON evo SUV
    68.60 dB
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    70.00 dB
  3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    70.00 dB
  4. Falken e.Ziex
    70.20 dB
  5. Continental PremiumContact 7
    70.30 dB
  6. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    70.50 dB
  7. GT Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    70.50 dB
  8. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    71.20 dB
  9. Michelin Pilot Sport EV
    71.30 dB

Value

The Continental PremiumContact 7 demonstrated the lowest wear rate, promising the highest mileage. The Bridgestone Potenza Sport had the highest wear, just half of the Continental.

Wear

Spread: 18355.00 KM (49.8%)|Avg: 31178.13 KM
Predicted tread life in KM (Higher is better)
  1. Continental PremiumContact 7
    36885.00 KM
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    35865.00 KM
  3. Hankook iON evo SUV
    35695.00 KM
  4. GT Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    34905.00 KM
  5. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    33015.00 KM
  6. Falken e.Ziex
    27375.00 KM
  7. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    27155.00 KM
  8. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    18530.00 KM

The rolling resistance and energy consumption tests yielded intriguing results, particularly for the Bridgestone Potenza Sport and GT Radial SportActive 2 EV tyres. In the rolling resistance test, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport had the highest rolling resistance, while the GT Radial SportActive 2 EV performed well, ranking second only to the Falken e.Ziex.

However, the real-world efficiency test revealed a different picture. The GT Radial SportActive 2 EV, despite its low rolling resistance in the lab test, consumed the most energy during real-world testing. This discrepancy highlights the importance of conducting both laboratory and real-world assessments to gain a comprehensive understanding of a tyre's performance.

The article does not provide specific theories to explain this discrepancy, but it is possible that other factors, such as the tyre's construction, compound, or interaction with the road surface, may have contributed to the GT Radial SportActive 2 EV's higher energy consumption in real-world conditions.

Value

Spread: 23.77 Price/1000 (163.4%)|Avg: 22.42 Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear (Lower is better)
  1. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    14.55 Price/1000
  2. Hankook iON evo SUV
    19.33 Price/1000
  3. GT Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    19.48 Price/1000
  4. Continental PremiumContact 7
    20.20 Price/1000
  5. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    21.05 Price/1000
  6. Falken e.Ziex
    23.01 Price/1000
  7. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    23.42 Price/1000
  8. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    38.32 Price/1000

Energy Consumption

Spread: 2.54 kWh/100km (13.9%)|Avg: 19.52 kWh/100km
Energy consumption in kW hours per 100 km (Lower is better)
  1. Falken e.Ziex
    18.28 kWh/100km
  2. Continental PremiumContact 7
    18.46 kWh/100km
  3. Hankook iON evo SUV
    18.83 kWh/100km
  4. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    19.17 kWh/100km
  5. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    19.88 kWh/100km
  6. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    20.02 kWh/100km
  7. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    20.66 kWh/100km
  8. GT Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    20.82 kWh/100km

The Continental PremiumContact 7 produced the least amount of tyre abrasion, suggesting a more environmentally friendly performance. The Bridgestone Potenza Sport had the highest abrasion rate, which may lead to increased tyre particulate emissions.

Abrasion

Spread: 1024.00 g (95.8%)|Avg: 1303.13 g
Total weight loss after wear test in grams (Lower is better)
  1. Continental PremiumContact 7
    1069.00 g
  2. Hankook iON evo SUV
    1141.00 g
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
    1211.00 g
  4. Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
    1211.00 g
  5. GT Radial Sport Active 2 EV
    1222.00 g
  6. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    1234.00 g
  7. Falken e.Ziex
    1244.00 g
  8. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    2093.00 g

Results

1st

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

235/55 R19 105Y
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
  • EU Label: C/A/72
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Weight: 12.95 kgs
  • Price: 840.00
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 5th 34.1 M 33 M +1.1 M 96.77%
Dry Handling 2nd 70.9 Km/H 71.3 Km/H -0.4 Km/H 99.44%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 3rd 39.2 M 37.7 M +1.5 M 96.17%
Wet Handling 2nd 58.5 Km/H 59.2 Km/H -0.7 Km/H 98.82%
Wet Circle 3rd 12.93 s 12.88 s +0.05 s 99.61%
Straight Aqua 1st 95.5 Km/H 100%
Curved Aquaplaning 3rd 3.25 m/sec2 3.28 m/sec2 -0.03 m/sec2 99.09%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 2nd 70 dB 68.6 dB +1.4 dB 98%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wear 2nd 35865 KM 36885 KM -1020 KM 97.23%
Value 7th 23.42 Price/1000 14.55 Price/1000 +8.87 Price/1000 62.13%
Rolling Resistance 8th 7.99 kg / t 5.55 kg / t +2.44 kg / t 69.46%
Energy Consumption 4th 19.17 kWh/100km 18.28 kWh/100km +0.89 kWh/100km 95.36%
Abrasion 3rd 1211 g 1069 g +142 g 88.27%
Read Reviews Test Results Buy from £179.99 Results Table Test Charts
2nd

Continental PremiumContact 7

235/55 R19 105Y
Continental PremiumContact 7
  • EU Label: C/A/72
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Weight: 11.95 kgs
  • Price: 745.00
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 2nd 33.2 M 33 M +0.2 M 99.4%
Dry Handling 1st 71.3 Km/H 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 1st 37.7 M 100%
Wet Handling 4th 57.6 Km/H 59.2 Km/H -1.6 Km/H 97.3%
Wet Circle 1st 12.88 s 100%
Straight Aqua 7th 93.4 Km/H 95.5 Km/H -2.1 Km/H 97.8%
Curved Aquaplaning 6th 2.96 m/sec2 3.28 m/sec2 -0.32 m/sec2 90.24%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 5th 70.3 dB 68.6 dB +1.7 dB 97.58%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wear 1st 36885 KM 100%
Value 4th 20.2 Price/1000 14.55 Price/1000 +5.65 Price/1000 72.03%
Rolling Resistance 4th 6.64 kg / t 5.55 kg / t +1.09 kg / t 83.58%
Energy Consumption 2nd 18.46 kWh/100km 18.28 kWh/100km +0.18 kWh/100km 99.02%
Abrasion 1st 1069 g 100%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
2nd

Hankook iON evo SUV

235/55 R19 105Y
Hankook iON evo SUV
  • EU Label: A/A/69
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Weight: 13.35 kgs
  • Price: 690.00
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 1st 33 M 100%
Dry Handling 5th 70.2 Km/H 71.3 Km/H -1.1 Km/H 98.46%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 4th 39.4 M 37.7 M +1.7 M 95.69%
Wet Handling 5th 57.1 Km/H 59.2 Km/H -2.1 Km/H 96.45%
Wet Circle 6th 13.11 s 12.88 s +0.23 s 98.25%
Straight Aqua 4th 94.4 Km/H 95.5 Km/H -1.1 Km/H 98.85%
Curved Aquaplaning 5th 2.99 m/sec2 3.28 m/sec2 -0.29 m/sec2 91.16%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 1st 68.6 dB 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wear 3rd 35695 KM 36885 KM -1190 KM 96.77%
Value 2nd 19.33 Price/1000 14.55 Price/1000 +4.78 Price/1000 75.27%
Rolling Resistance 5th 6.88 kg / t 5.55 kg / t +1.33 kg / t 80.67%
Energy Consumption 3rd 18.83 kWh/100km 18.28 kWh/100km +0.55 kWh/100km 97.08%
Abrasion 2nd 1141 g 1069 g +72 g 93.69%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
4th

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

235/55 R19 105Y
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
  • EU Label: B/A/69
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Weight: 13.08 kgs
  • Price: 695.00
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 3rd 33.9 M 33 M +0.9 M 97.35%
Dry Handling 4th 70.4 Km/H 71.3 Km/H -0.9 Km/H 98.74%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 2nd 39.1 M 37.7 M +1.4 M 96.42%
Wet Handling 3rd 58.3 Km/H 59.2 Km/H -0.9 Km/H 98.48%
Wet Circle 5th 13.01 s 12.88 s +0.13 s 99%
Straight Aqua 3rd 94.6 Km/H 95.5 Km/H -0.9 Km/H 99.06%
Curved Aquaplaning 2nd 3.27 m/sec2 3.28 m/sec2 -0.01 m/sec2 99.7%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 2nd 70 dB 68.6 dB +1.4 dB 98%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wear 5th 33015 KM 36885 KM -3870 KM 89.51%
Value 5th 21.05 Price/1000 14.55 Price/1000 +6.5 Price/1000 69.12%
Rolling Resistance 6th 7.51 kg / t 5.55 kg / t +1.96 kg / t 73.9%
Energy Consumption 6th 20.02 kWh/100km 18.28 kWh/100km +1.74 kWh/100km 91.31%
Abrasion 6th 1234 g 1069 g +165 g 86.63%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
5th

Falken e.Ziex

235/55 R19 105V
Falken e.Ziex
  • EU Label: A/A/69
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Weight: 11.79 kgs
  • Price: 630.00
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 6th 34.7 M 33 M +1.7 M 95.1%
Dry Handling 7th 69.6 Km/H 71.3 Km/H -1.7 Km/H 97.62%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 6th 42.4 M 37.7 M +4.7 M 88.92%
Wet Handling 6th 56.3 Km/H 59.2 Km/H -2.9 Km/H 95.1%
Wet Circle 7th 13.39 s 12.88 s +0.51 s 96.19%
Straight Aqua 9th 92.1 Km/H 95.5 Km/H -3.4 Km/H 96.44%
Curved Aquaplaning 7th 2.94 m/sec2 3.28 m/sec2 -0.34 m/sec2 89.63%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 4th 70.2 dB 68.6 dB +1.6 dB 97.72%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wear 6th 27375 KM 36885 KM -9510 KM 74.22%
Value 6th 23.01 Price/1000 14.55 Price/1000 +8.46 Price/1000 63.23%
Rolling Resistance 1st 5.55 kg / t 100%
Energy Consumption 1st 18.28 kWh/100km 100%
Abrasion 7th 1244 g 1069 g +175 g 85.93%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
6th

GT Radial Sport Active 2 EV

235/55 R19 105V
GT Radial Sport Active 2 EV
  • EU Label: A/A/69
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Weight: 12.89 kgs
  • Price: 680.00
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 9th 37.9 M 33 M +4.9 M 87.07%
Dry Handling 8th 67.6 Km/H 71.3 Km/H -3.7 Km/H 94.81%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 8th 46 M 37.7 M +8.3 M 81.96%
Wet Handling 8th 55.2 Km/H 59.2 Km/H -4 Km/H 93.24%
Wet Circle 8th 13.45 s 12.88 s +0.57 s 95.76%
Straight Aqua 6th 94.1 Km/H 95.5 Km/H -1.4 Km/H 98.53%
Curved Aquaplaning 9th 2.64 m/sec2 3.28 m/sec2 -0.64 m/sec2 80.49%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 6th 70.5 dB 68.6 dB +1.9 dB 97.3%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wear 4th 34905 KM 36885 KM -1980 KM 94.63%
Value 3rd 19.48 Price/1000 14.55 Price/1000 +4.93 Price/1000 74.69%
Rolling Resistance 2nd 6.17 kg / t 5.55 kg / t +0.62 kg / t 89.95%
Energy Consumption 8th 20.82 kWh/100km 18.28 kWh/100km +2.54 kWh/100km 87.8%
Abrasion 5th 1222 g 1069 g +153 g 87.48%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
7th

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

235/55 R19 105Y
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
  • EU Label: C/A/72
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Weight: 13.48 kgs
  • Price: 710.00
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 4th 34 M 33 M +1 M 97.06%
Dry Handling 3rd 70.7 Km/H 71.3 Km/H -0.6 Km/H 99.16%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 4th 39.4 M 37.7 M +1.7 M 95.69%
Wet Handling 1st 59.2 Km/H 100%
Wet Circle 1st 12.88 s 100%
Straight Aqua 4th 94.4 Km/H 95.5 Km/H -1.1 Km/H 98.85%
Curved Aquaplaning 4th 3.24 m/sec2 3.28 m/sec2 -0.04 m/sec2 98.78%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 8th 71.2 dB 68.6 dB +2.6 dB 96.35%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wear 8th 18530 KM 36885 KM -18355 KM 50.24%
Value 8th 38.32 Price/1000 14.55 Price/1000 +23.77 Price/1000 37.97%
Rolling Resistance 9th 9.1 kg / t 5.55 kg / t +3.55 kg / t 60.99%
Energy Consumption 7th 20.66 kWh/100km 18.28 kWh/100km +2.38 kWh/100km 88.48%
Abrasion 8th 2093 g 1069 g +1024 g 51.08%
Read Reviews Test Results Buy from £165.99 Results Table Test Charts
8th

Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco

235/55 R19 105V
Goodride Z 107 ZuperEco
  • EU Label: C/B/72
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Weight: 13.10 kgs
  • Price: 395.00
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 8th 37.2 M 33 M +4.2 M 88.71%
Dry Handling 9th 67.1 Km/H 71.3 Km/H -4.2 Km/H 94.11%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 9th 48.1 M 37.7 M +10.4 M 78.38%
Wet Handling 9th 54.3 Km/H 59.2 Km/H -4.9 Km/H 91.72%
Wet Circle 9th 13.95 s 12.88 s +1.07 s 92.33%
Straight Aqua 2nd 94.7 Km/H 95.5 Km/H -0.8 Km/H 99.16%
Curved Aquaplaning 1st 3.28 m/sec2 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 6th 70.5 dB 68.6 dB +1.9 dB 97.3%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wear 7th 27155 KM 36885 KM -9730 KM 73.62%
Value 1st 14.55 Price/1000 100%
Rolling Resistance 7th 7.71 kg / t 5.55 kg / t +2.16 kg / t 71.98%
Energy Consumption 5th 19.88 kWh/100km 18.28 kWh/100km +1.6 kWh/100km 91.95%
Abrasion 3rd 1211 g 1069 g +142 g 88.27%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts
9th

Michelin Pilot Sport EV

235/55 R19
Michelin Pilot Sport EV
  • 3PMSF: no
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 7th 35 M 33 M +2 M 94.29%
Dry Handling 6th 70.1 Km/H 71.3 Km/H -1.2 Km/H 98.32%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 7th 43.3 M 37.7 M +5.6 M 87.07%
Wet Handling 7th 56.2 Km/H 59.2 Km/H -3 Km/H 94.93%
Wet Circle 4th 12.95 s 12.88 s +0.07 s 99.46%
Straight Aqua 8th 93.2 Km/H 95.5 Km/H -2.3 Km/H 97.59%
Curved Aquaplaning 8th 2.7 m/sec2 3.28 m/sec2 -0.58 m/sec2 82.32%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 9th 71.3 dB 68.6 dB +2.7 dB 96.21%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Rolling Resistance 3rd 6.55 kg / t 5.55 kg / t +1 kg / t 84.73%
Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

Similar Tyre Tests

Show All summer tyre tests
2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
February 2026 225/50 R17 Continental PremiumContact 7 16 tyres
2026 Netzwelt Mid Range Summer Tyre Test
February 2026 205/55 R16 Continental PremiumContact 7 6 tyres
2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
February 2026 235/45 R18 Continental PremiumContact 7 10 tyres
2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking?
February 2026 245/45 R19 Linglong Sport Master 50 tyres
2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test
February 2026 225/40 R18 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S 10 tyres
2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test
January 2026 235/35 R19 Bridgestone Potenza Sport 9 tyres
comments powered by Disqus