Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 vs Maxxis Victra Sport 6
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 finished ahead 2 times and the Victra Sport 6 not once. The N Fera Sport SU2 was stronger in wet, comfort and value.
Performance profile
14 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
N Fera Sport SU2
Victra Sport 6
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 80%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
N Fera Sport SU2
Victra Sport 6
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | N Fera Sport SU2 | Gap | Victra Sport 6 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Level | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 33.9 | 3.4% | 35.1 | 2-0 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 99.4 | 1.2% | 100.6 | 0-1 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 29.9% | scored | 0-1 |
| Wet N Fera Sport SU2 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 34.7 | 5.7% | 36.8 | 2-0 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 82 | 1.6% | 80.7 | 1-0 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 37.7% | scored | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle s | 14.82 | 4.4% | 15.51 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 92.9 | 4.1% | 89.2 | 1-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.38 | 7% | 3.16 | 1-0 |
| Comfort N Fera Sport SU2 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 9% | scored | 1-0 |
| Noise dB | 70.6 | 1.2 dB | 71.8 | 1-0 |
| Value N Fera Sport SU2 ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 47,810 | 20.5% | 39,670 | 1-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.04 | 0.5% | 8.08 | 1-0 |
| Abrasion g | 1,719 | 8.3% | 1,875 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 2 tests in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | N Fera Sport SU2 | Field | Victra Sport 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | P9 of 20 | P18 of 20 | |
| 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | P3 of 50 | P15 of 50 |
N Fera Sport SU2 vs Victra Sport 6: your questions
Is the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 or the Maxxis Victra Sport 6 the better tyre?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 finished ahead 2 times and the Victra Sport 6 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the N Fera Sport SU2 scores 8.4 and the Victra Sport 6 8.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the N Fera Sport SU2 or the Victra Sport 6?
The N Fera Sport SU2 led 7 of the 7 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.7% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 2-2 between the N Fera Sport SU2 and the Victra Sport 6.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the N Fera Sport SU2 70% from 18 reviews; the Victra Sport 6 has no owner reviews yet.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
6-3 in 9 shared tests
vs
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
8-1 in 9 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
10-1 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Maxxis Victra Sport 6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
1-2 in 3 shared tests
vs
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
3-1 in 4 shared tests
vs
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
4-1 in 5 shared tests
vs
Linglong Sport Master vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
6-1 in 7 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.