Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
In this article we will be looking at independent tyre test data, and real world driver reviews of the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 and the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 to find out which tyre is best for your own driving.
The good news is that both the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 and Yokohama Advan Sport V107 are Ultra High Performance Summer tyres designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars, which means comparing the two tyres is relatively simple.
Both tyres are hugely popular in the market place with drivers, and both have been featured in independent tyre tests.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been seven tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 | three | |
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107 | four |
While it might look like the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is better than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Dry Braking
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during five dry braking tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 stopped the vehicle in 2.44% less distance than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Dry Braking: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during three dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was 2.85% faster around a lap than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 scored 22.99% more points than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during five wet braking tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 stopped the vehicle in 2.7% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 stopped the vehicle in 2.08% less distance than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was 0.53% faster around a wet lap than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 and Yokohama Advan Sport V107 performed equally well in subj. wet handling tests.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was 1.58% faster around a wet circle than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Circle: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 floated at a 0.7% higher speed than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Straight Aqua: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 slipped out at a 5.15% higher speed than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 scored 8.94% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during four noise tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 measured 2.74% quieter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Noise: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during three wear tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 is predicted to cover 7.01% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wear: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during four value tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 proved to have a 20.45% better value based on price/1000km than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Value: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during one price tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 cost 24.07% less than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Price: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 had a 17.58% lower rolling resistance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 used 1.75% less fuel than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 lost 4.18% less particle wear matter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Abrasion: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 Driver Reviews
For the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2, most high-scoring reviews praise strong dry and wet grip, predictable handling, acceptable comfort for some, and excellent value. However, a significant portion of mid/low-scoring reviews report fast shoulder wear, durability/quality issues, and higher noise/harshness, especially over time. Overall sentiment is mixed but leans slightly positive due to several very high-rated performance-focused reviews, while longevity and refinement remain common concerns.
Based on 17 reviews with an average rating of 70%
Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Driver Reviews
Drivers report the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 delivers strong dry grip, sharp handling, and confident wet performance when warm, with several high-scoring reviews praising its sporty feel and feedback (including on EVs). However, many note high road noise on coarse surfaces and notably fast tread wear, making it less ideal for daily comfort or longevity-focused use.
Based on 20 reviews with an average rating of 73%
Conclusion
In conclusion the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 performed better in wet braking, wet circle, straight aqua, subj. comfort, noise, wear, value, price, rolling resistance, fuel consumption and abrasion, while the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 performed better in dry braking, dry handling [km/h], subj. dry handling, wet braking - concrete, wet handling [km/h] and curved aquaplaning.
Interestingly, both tyres performed equally well in dry handling, wet handling and subj. wet handling, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.
Which tyre is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tyre. Comparing all the data in the tyre reviews database, on balance Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 seems to be the best tyre overall.
However, it's important to note that both tyres have their strengths.
Remember, the best tyre for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.
Overall Winner: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tyre.
Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tyre.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.