Nokian Outpost nAT vs Nitto Recon Grappler AT
Ahead in each discipline
The Nokian Outpost nAT and the Nitto Recon Grappler AT have met in one independent test so far, and the Outpost nAT finished ahead. The Outpost nAT was stronger in wet, snow, off road and comfort.
Performance profile
15 measurements from the one shared test, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Outpost nAT
Recon Grappler AT
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 80%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Outpost nAT
Recon Grappler AT
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tyres' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tyre that did better.
| Measurement | Outpost nAT | Gap | Recon Grappler AT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Level | |||
| Dry Braking m | 45.27 | 0.1% | 45.24 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | 10 | 11.1% | 9 |
| Wet Outpost nAT ahead | |||
| Wet Braking m | 42.29 | 6.9% | 45.44 |
| Wet Handling s | 129.1 | 3.5% | 133.8 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | 8.2 | 24.2% | 6.6 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 105.8 | 9% | 97.1 |
| Snow Outpost nAT ahead | |||
| Snow Braking m | 13.5 | 2.6% | 13.86 |
| Snow Traction s | 5.5 | 11.7% | 6.23 |
| Snow Handling s | 81.61 | 2.9% | 84.03 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | 8.6 | 3.6% | 8.3 |
| Off road Outpost nAT ahead | |||
| Dirt Handling s | 75.43 | 0.2% | 75.59 |
| Subj. Dirt Handling pts | 8.5 | 4.9% | 8.1 |
| Comfort Outpost nAT ahead | |||
| Subj. Comfort pts | 10 | 25% | 8 |
| Subj. Noise pts | 10 | 42.9% | 7 |
| Noise dB | 54.83 | 0.9 dB | 55.75 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Outpost nAT | Field | Recon Grappler AT |
|---|---|---|---|
| The BEST All Terrain Tyres for 2026 Tested and Rated | P2 of 7 | P7 of 7 |
Outpost nAT vs Recon Grappler AT: your questions
Is the Nokian Outpost nAT or the Nitto Recon Grappler AT the better tyre?
The Nokian Outpost nAT and the Nitto Recon Grappler AT have met in one independent test so far, and the Outpost nAT finished ahead. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Outpost nAT scores 8.6 and the Recon Grappler AT 6.3 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Outpost nAT or the Recon Grappler AT?
The Outpost nAT led 4 of the 4 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 1-1 between the Outpost nAT and the Recon Grappler AT.
Which is better in snow?
The Outpost nAT led 4 of the 4 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.6/10 for the Outpost nAT and 9/10 for the Recon Grappler AT.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Outpost nAT 80% from 19 reviews and the Recon Grappler AT 66% from 1.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs Nokian Outpost nAT
0-2 in 2 shared tests
vs
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO3 vs Nokian Outpost nAT
0-2 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs Nitto Recon Grappler AT
4-0 in 4 shared tests
vs
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO3 vs Nitto Recon Grappler AT
3-0 in 3 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Wrangler DuraTrac RT vs Nitto Recon Grappler AT
1-1 in 3 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.