Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs Nokian Outpost nAT
- TR Score
- 8.3/10
- Owners say
- 78% · 11
- TR Score
- 8.6/10
- Owners say
- 80% · 19
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Nokian Outpost nAT finished ahead 2 times and the Wildpeak AT4W not once. The Outpost nAT was 16.3% quicker in the snow traction test.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Nokian Outpost nAT if you want the most confident all-terrain tyre for mixed climates-especially real winter use, frequent rain, and quieter daily driving-backed by top overall finishes and wins. Consider the Falken Wildpeak AT4W mainly if dry-road braking and general all-terrain use/durability are your priorities and you can tolerate clearly weaker wet aquaplaning and snow/ice performance.
Where the Wildpeak AT4W is stronger
- Stronger dry braking in the shared 2026 test (44.08 m vs 45.27 m)
- Slightly quicker dirt lap time in 2026 (75.18 s vs 75.43 s) indicating competent loose-surface pace
- Decent all-round comfort/noise for an A/T tyre (mid-pack subjective scores)
Where the Outpost nAT is stronger
- Consistently class-leading winter performance; wins snow braking/traction/handling in both tests (e.g., snow traction 5.5 s vs 7.25 s in 2026)
- Best straight-line aquaplaning resistance in the 2026 test (105.8 km/h)
- More refined on-road feel with higher subjective comfort and noise scores (10/10 in both comfort and subjective noise in 2026)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Wildpeak AT4W vs Outpost nAT at a glance
| Category | Wildpeak AT4W | Gap | Outpost nAT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won2 shared tests | 0 | 2 | |
| Dry2 measurements | 1 | Level between the two. | 1 |
| Wet4 measurements | 0 | 4 | |
| Snow9 measurements | 0 | The Outpost nAT was 16.3% quicker in the snow traction test (2 tests) | 9 |
| Ice2 measurements | 0 | 2 | |
| Off road2 measurements | 1 | Level between the two. | 1 |
| Comfort3 measurements | 0 | 3 | |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.3/10 | The Outpost nAT by 0.3 | 8.6/10 |
| Owner rating11 and 19 reviews | 78% | The Outpost nAT by 2 points | 80% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 80% | The Wildpeak AT4W by 8 points | 72% |
| Pricein the 2 tests that listed prices | Level | Level |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 2 tests, 2025 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Wildpeak AT4W | Field | Outpost nAT |
|---|---|---|---|
| The BEST All Terrain Tyres for 2026 Tested and Rated | P6 of 7 | P2 of 7 | |
| The Best All Terrain Tyres For Winter 2025 Tested | P5 of 5 | P1 of 5 |
Performance profile
18 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Wildpeak AT4W
Outpost nAT
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
Wildpeak AT4W
Outpost nAT
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Wildpeak AT4W
Outpost nAT
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Wildpeak AT4W 78% from 11 reviews and the Outpost nAT 80% from 19. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Wildpeak AT4W | Gap | Outpost nAT | Wins | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.08 | 2.6% | 45.27 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 5.3% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 42.39 | 0.2% | 42.29 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 131.2 | 1.6% | 129.1 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 9.3% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 95.4 | 10.9% | 105.8 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 19.89 | 12.1% | 17.65 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 5.62 | 16.3% | 4.57 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 98.43 | 7% | 91.7 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 13% | scored | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 35.96 | 6.3% | 33.69 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 12.89 | 12.1% | 11.33 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 2.06 | 1.5% | 2.03 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 75.18 | 0.3% | 75.43 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 2.4% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 11.1% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 17.6% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 55.05 | 0.2 dB | 54.83 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Wildpeak AT4W scores 8.3 and the Outpost nAT 8.6 out of 10.
| Wildpeak AT4W | Category | Outpost nAT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | Dry | 60 | ||
| 51 | Wet | 68 | ||
| 41 | Comfort | 64 | ||
| 91 | Value | 81 | ||
| 17 | Snow | 56 | ||
| 29 | Ice | 57 | ||
| 78 | Off road | 63 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Wildpeak AT4W | Category | Outpost nAT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.9 | Dry Grip | 8.6 | ||
| 8.4 | Wet Grip | 8.2 | ||
| 6.8 | Road Feedback | 6.9 | ||
| 7.1 | Handling | 7.6 | ||
| 8.8 | Wear | 8.3 | ||
| 8.1 | Comfort | 7.6 | ||
| 6.7 | Snow Grip | 9.1 | ||
| 5.2 | Ice Grip | 7.3 | ||
Owners rate the Wildpeak AT4W 78% from 11 reviews and the Outpost nAT 80% from 19. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Falken Wildpeak AT4W
- 78%from 11 reviews
- 80%would buy again
- 107,500 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers generally rate the Falken Wildpeak AT4W highly, praising its strong off-road capability and confident dry-road manners, with many also noting surprisingly low noise and good overall comfort for an all-terrain tyre. Wet traction is often described as good to very good, and several users report solid treadwear so far. A notable minority, however, say snow/ice performance (especially braking and slick city winter conditions) doesn't meet expectations for a 3PMS-rated tyre, with a few planning to switch to a dedicated winter setup.
- Excellent off-road traction (dirt/rock/sand/gravel/mud)
- Strong dry-road grip and stable handling
- Generally good wet traction for an all-terrain tyre
- Low road noise/quiet for an A/T tyre
- Snow and ice performance not as strong as expected (especially braking/traction on slick winter surfaces)
Summarised by AI from 11 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 11 Wildpeak AT4W reviewsThese are absolutely incredible. As in life, one gets what he pays for. Worth every dollar! Highly recommend
Nokian Outpost nAT
- 80%from 19 reviews
- 72%would buy again
- 210,120 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners rate the Nokian Outpost nAT highly overall, with most praising its standout snow traction and secure all-round grip for an all-terrain tyre. Around two thirds of owners mention road noise, and opinions are split, though it leans slightly towards being louder or more 'droney' at certain speeds. Comfort is generally well regarded, and those who use it off-road report consistently strong traction, while a noticeable minority mention mixed results for rolling resistance (some seeing little change, others a small mpg hit).
- Excellent snow traction for an all-terrain tyre
- Strong off-road traction on mud and rough tracks
- Comfortable ride that handles potholes and poor surfaces well
- Confidence-inspiring wet grip
- Road noise can be noticeable, with a drone or hum for some
- Rolling resistance/fuel economy impact is inconsistent and can drop mpg
- Slightly reduced steering precision compared with more road-focused tyres
Summarised by AI from 18 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 19 Outpost nAT reviewsI bought LT version instead of P version to get a little more tread depth and load capability. They are pleasant for an AT tire. A little bit of noise around 55 MPH. They perform well in all types of road surfaces and conditions except for ice which is to be expected from an AT tire. Southern Ontario Canada is the location they are used in. City driving affected fuel mileage, but highway driving, not so much. Mounted on a 2019 Nissan Frontier Pro-4x. The only tire I can compare them to would be the factory equipped P series Hankook AT-M. The Nokians are better in every way except for comfort, noise and mileage which is to be expected when comparing an LT AT tire to a P series all weather tire.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
| Category | Wildpeak AT4W | Outpost nAT |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Replaced | Falken Wildpeak AT3W | Nokian Outpost AT (2021) |
| Price in the shared tests | Within 1% of each other on average across the 2 tests that listed prices. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Falken's Wildpeak AT4W and Nokian's Outpost nAT are both 3PMSF-rated, all-season all-terrain tyres aimed at SUV and 4x4 owners who want one set to cover daily road miles and genuine off-road use. On paper they sit in the same “do-it-all” niche, but the shared test data (both in 265/70 R17) shows they prioritize very different parts of the performance envelope.
Across two independent professional group tests-one focused on overall all-terrain balance (2026) and one heavily weighted to winter (2025)-the Nokian consistently lands near the top (2/8 with a “Highly Recommended” award, then 1/6 as the winter test winner). The Falken, by contrast, places in the bottom half (6/8 and 5/6). The interesting twist is that the Falken's best measurable advantage shows up in dry braking, while the Nokian builds its lead through winter capability, aquaplaning resistance, and day-to-day refinement.
Conclusion
If you need a single all-terrain tyre that stays composed when conditions turn ugly, the Nokian Outpost nAT is the clear pick from these results. It dominates the winter metrics in both tests-snow braking (e.g., 13.5 m vs 16.21 m in 2026; 21.79 m vs 23.57 m in 2025), traction, and handling-and pairs that with a major safety advantage in standing water, delivering the best straight-line aquaplaning speed in the 2026 test (105.8 km/h vs the Falken's 95.4 km/h, a ~10.9% gap). It also scores higher subjectively for comfort and noise, and edges value on the provided price index.
The Falken Wildpeak AT4W's case rests mainly on dry-road stopping and acceptable dirt performance. It posts the better dry braking number in the 2026 test (44.08 m vs 45.27 m), and it narrowly wins the dirt lap time (75.18 s vs 75.43 s) in a very tight group. However, the broader pattern is hard to ignore: it trails meaningfully in wet handling and is repeatedly at the back in snow/ice measures, with test notes suggesting the LT version in particular has traded winter grip for wear resistance. Practical takeaway: if your driving includes real winter, frequent heavy rain, or you value quiet/refined road manners, the Outpost nAT is the smarter and safer all-rounder; the AT4W only makes sense if your priority is dry braking plus general all-terrain use and you can accept weaker wet/winter security.
Wildpeak AT4W vs Outpost nAT: your questions
Is the Falken Wildpeak AT4W or the Nokian Outpost nAT the better tyre?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Nokian Outpost nAT finished ahead 2 times and the Wildpeak AT4W not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Wildpeak AT4W scores 8.3 and the Outpost nAT 8.6 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Wildpeak AT4W or the Outpost nAT?
The Outpost nAT led 4 of the 4 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 1-1 between the Wildpeak AT4W and the Outpost nAT.
Which is better in snow?
The Outpost nAT led 9 of the 9 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it was 16.3% quicker in the snow traction test across 2 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.1/10 for the Wildpeak AT4W and 7.6/10 for the Outpost nAT.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Wildpeak AT4W 78% from 11 reviews and the Outpost nAT 80% from 19. 80% of Wildpeak AT4W owners would buy it again, against 72% for the Outpost nAT.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the two were priced within 1% of each other on average.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO3 vs Falken Wildpeak AT4W
2-2 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs Toyo Open Country AT III
2-1 in 3 shared tests
vs
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO3 vs Nokian Outpost nAT
0-2 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs Nitto Recon Grappler AT
4-0 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs Goodyear Wrangler DuraTrac RT
2-1 in 3 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion