The Falken Wildpeak AT4W is an all-terrain tyre with strong off-road traction, good dry-road grip and short dry braking distances. Its main weakness is snow performance, particularly traction and braking.
The quick answer
Owners say76%from 11 owner reviews80% would buy againRead the reviews
Strengths & weaknessesValue, DryIce, SnowRelative to its rivals across every test we hold
Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tyre - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated October 2026.
The Falken WildPeak A/T4W, a 3PMSF off-road all-terrain, is the clearest split between feel and measurement in this test. It shared third place on the drivers' rating, which covers cornering and composure, yet its measured snow stopping and traction sat near the bottom, so its strength is handling balance rather than straight-line grip.
Winner: Cooper Discoverer Stronghold AT
Every independent test of the Falken Wildpeak AT4W, newest first
In 265/70 R17, the Falken Wildpeak AT4W is projected to cost $25.91 per 1,000 miles to buy and run - about $648 over 25,000 miles - based on its US price and the manufacturer's treadwear warranty, from the The BEST All Terrain Tyres for 2026 Tested and Rated.
Tyre life here is the manufacturer's treadwear warranty, NOT measured wear - treat it as the maker's promise, not a test result.
Tyre purchase + fittingExtra fuel vs the most efficient tyrecost per 1,000 miles
Tyre life is the manufacturer's treadwear warranty, not measured wear. Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at $0.95 per litre and $80 fitting per set of four. US prices are from the time of the 2026 test; financing costs are excluded.
Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Falken Wildpeak AT4W in the wet?
Across the 3 wet-braking tests it has featured in, the Falken Wildpeak AT4W stops 5.7% longer than premium rivals, 1.7% shorter than mid-range rivals and 13.8% longer than budget rivals. It has a Tyre Reviews wet score of 51/100, and owners rate it 8.4/10 in the wet from 11 reviews.
How good is the Falken Wildpeak AT4W in the dry?
Across the 3 dry-braking tests it has featured in, the Falken Wildpeak AT4W stops 0.1% shorter than premium rivals, 4% shorter than mid-range rivals and 2.3% shorter than budget rivals. It has a Tyre Reviews dry score of 81/100, and owners rate it 8.9/10 in the dry from 11 reviews.
How good is the Falken Wildpeak AT4W in the snow?
Across the 4 snow-braking tests it has featured in, the Falken Wildpeak AT4W stops 13.4% longer than premium rivals, 11.9% longer than mid-range rivals and 9.1% longer than budget rivals. Across the 3 snow-traction tests, it is 25.1% worse than premium rivals, 14% worse than mid-range rivals and 11.5% worse than budget rivals. It has a Tyre Reviews snow score of 17/100, and owners rate it 6.7/10 in the snow from 11 reviews.
How good is the Falken Wildpeak AT4W on ice?
Across the 2 ice-braking tests it has featured in, the Falken Wildpeak AT4W stops 0.2% shorter than premium rivals, 2.1% shorter than mid-range rivals and 0.5% longer than budget rivals. Across the 2 ice-traction tests, it is 0.3% better than premium rivals, 0.6% worse than mid-range rivals and 2% better than budget rivals. It has a Tyre Reviews ice score of 29/100, and owners rate it 5.2/10 on ice from 11 reviews.
How fuel efficient is the Falken Wildpeak AT4W?
Across the 1 test measuring rolling resistance, the Falken Wildpeak AT4W's rolling resistance is 7.3% higher than premium rivals, 12% higher than mid-range rivals and 1% lower than budget rivals.
More questions about the Falken Wildpeak AT4W(6)
What do owners say about the Falken Wildpeak AT4W?
Across 11 owner ratings the Falken Wildpeak AT4W averages 76%. Owners rate Dry Grip highest at 8.9 out of 10 and Ice Grip lowest at 5.2. 6 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 82% of owners score it 70% or better.
How much does the Falken Wildpeak AT4W cost to run?
In 265/70 R17, the Falken Wildpeak AT4W is projected to cost $25.91 per 1,000 miles to buy and run - about $648 over 25,000 miles - based on its US price and the manufacturer's treadwear warranty, from the The BEST All Terrain Tyres for 2026 Tested and Rated. The cheapest to run in that test is the Westlake SL369, at $23.07.
How comfortable and quiet are the Falken Wildpeak AT4W?
Owners rate the Falken Wildpeak AT4W 8.1 out of 10 for comfort and noise across 11 reviews.
How well do the Falken Wildpeak AT4W wear, according to owners?
Owners rate the Falken Wildpeak AT4W 8.8 out of 10 for wear across 11 reviews. 6 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles, and the typical review covers 10,000 miles.
Would owners buy the Falken Wildpeak AT4W again?
80% of owners say they would buy the Falken Wildpeak AT4W again, based on the 10 owner reviews that answered the question. 70% of them gave it the highest possible answer.
What does the Falken Wildpeak AT4W replace?
The Falken Wildpeak AT4W is the successor to the Falken Wildpeak AT3W in Falken's range.
Questions and Answers for the Falken Wildpeak AT4W
The Falken Wildpeak AT4W tire is available in 225/75 R 16C 116 R. It would be excellent for camper vans and motorhomes, which require this type of tire.<br><Br>… Show moreThe Falken Wildpeak AT4W tire is available in 225/75 R 16C 116 R. It would be excellent for camper vans and motorhomes, which require this type of tire.<br><Br>
Thank you for your response. Show less
September 14, 2025
The good news is that the AT4/W is manufactured in 225/75 R16C 121/120R. The bad news is I'm unsure of its European availability, but you can currently buy it in the US market.
Drivers generally rate the Falken Wildpeak AT4W highly, praising its strong off-road capability and confident dry-road manners, with many also noting surprisingly low noise and good overall comfort for an all-terrain tyre. Wet traction is often described as good to very good, and several users report solid treadwear so far. A notable minority, however, say snow/ice performance (especially braking and slick city winter conditions) doesn't meet expectations for a 3PMS-rated tyre, with a few planning to switch to a dedicated winter setup.
What owners mention most counted across 11 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 11 ratings
Owner score76%
Dry Grip89%
Wear88%
Wet Grip84%
Comfort81%
Handling71%
Road Feedback68%
Snow Grip67%
Ice Grip52%
Featured reviews
Most helpful 38%
“I bought these tires from a dealer in starbuck mb and they told me they would be better in snow and ice than my geolander all weather tires had been. Well that was a big lie these tires are not good in snow and ice i...”
“I bought the new a/t4w based of how the older a/t3w was reviewed of how it performed in the snow. I wanted an all terrain tire that lasted long and did well for many types of driving conditions. The a/t4w's do well in...”
“As an AT4W owner with 37k KM's (now at roughly 16/32mm of treadlife left), I have a set of LT 285/70/17 on a 2DR Bronco and some days they exceed my expectations and others fall short. I've driven around Ontario, out...”
I've owned my 2007 Ford Ranger Sport for about 4 years now and the previous tires were truck/suv highway type. I was looking to replace them because they were absolutely horrible in the wet and snow. My ranger would ALWAYS lose traction on wet painted crosswalks, even at normal acceleration, and would take longer than I liked to recover. I don't do any off road driving and wanted the Michelin CrossClimate 2 because I put them on my daughter's Ford Escape and they performed above and beyond in Fargo and Duluth winters. But the CC2 doesn't come in the right size for my Ranger and all of the light truck street/highway tires rated poorly in wet and snow. In desperation I looked into the AT tire world and found many reviews that gave the WP AT4 high marks in wet and snow. The first rain shower after I put them on, I went looking for my crosswalk nemesis and was extremely pleased. No loss of traction at normal acceleration and when I punched it to force traction loss, traction was regained as soon as I cleared the paint. We've had several snow falls and some ice already this winter and I've had good experience. When I hit the gas a little too hard on a turn and start a fishtail, the tires grab again as soon as I let off the gas. I hit a patch of ice at the end of my block one morning and the tires and anitlock brakes kept me from sliding into the intersect for the first time since I bought my truck. On dry pavement, they are louder and ride more trucky, but I soon got used to it. Overall, my early impression is that I made a good choice.
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
The actual size of my tires are 35x11.5r17 in a C load range. I upgraded from a 285/70r17 at4w in a Passenger load range. When I upgraded to the 285's the performance gain over the goodyear wrangler duratracs I had was immense. They cornered better, had less noise, held a balance much better, and had much better traction in the wet. The 35's did not have a gain or loss in performance in dry performance at all, but the wet traction is slightly worse. The only negative I have for the bigger tires is they felt a little lazy on turn in but I fixed that by bumping the pressures up just a little. All of these tires were on a 2021 f150 that is lifted 2inches in the front 1 in in the rear, and has a steeda rear sway bay. It is worth noting that the duratracs had 30k miles and had 9-10/32nds inch of tread (16 new) and the 285 falkens had 20k miles and had 11/32 inch tread (no idea new) and the 35's only have 6k miles on them so far.
Which tyres do you drive?
Researching the Falken Wildpeak AT4W? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
I bought the new a/t4w based of how the older a/t3w was reviewed of how it performed in the snow. I wanted an all terrain tire that lasted long and did well for many types of driving conditions. The a/t4w's do well in dry road and off conditions. Their wet road performance is acceptable. they are quite and comfortable on the road as well. The snow and ice performance is where they lack a lot. For a 3 peak mountain snow rated tire, and the previous models ratings I was very disappointed in these tires. Falken advertises these tires as being engineered for severe winter conditions. They really missed the mark on that. If you live in a dry warm climate, these tires would do well. If you have all the seasons and expect them to do well on snowy slippery roads I would look else where. Unfortunately I will be replacing these tires due to poor snow and ice performance after only 15,000 miles,
Dry and wet grip feel good in my use which is mainly long highway stretches but with plenty of medium speed curvy back roads. I run them on my 2013 Lexus GX460. Have not had opportunity to test in snow or ice as of yet. Off road grip has been great with that mostly being loose gravel, soft dirt, and some mud/water crossings typically with rock bottoms. Wear has been very good in my experience so far with about 15,000 miles on them yet. I expect they will last to about 60,000 at the rate they are going however I will likely swap before making it that far. Previous tires I can compare to on this vehicle are Michelin primacy A/S and Toyo AT3. Compared to the Toyos, wear and handling are improved as well as needing less weight to be in balance. Comfort leans to the Toyo but it is close.
I use the WildPeak AT4w as my primary off-road tire on a Land Cruiser 250 (Prado). The tires are reasonably comfortable and responsive in daily driving and on long road trips, but really shine when I air them down and take them off-road on rocky mountain trails. I'm very pleased with the NVH characteristics of the WildPeak AT4w - they are louder than the OEM road tires, but not excessively so. Since the tires need to be at 39 psi on road, the ride can be a little harsh over bigger on road impacts (like pot holes and expansion joints.) I chose the AT4w in part to get a true 33" tire in a narrower width for better grip on rocky terrain. In my experience on dirt, rock, and sand, I found the grip to be excellent even in wet conditions. Excellent off-road and above average on road. If you aren't planning to use these on dirt, rock, sand, or mud, then you'd probably be better off finding a more road focused AT tire. The pic shows how well the tires conformed over rocky terrain aired down to around 20 psi.
I have the AT4Ws mounted up to my 2015 Nissan Frontier King Cab Pro4X 6spd and they are my first new set of tires on this truck. These tires have been on the truck for 16,000 km now and have been rotated twice, with the rears crossed forwards and the fronts moved straight back. When new, these had 14/32nds of an inch of tread, and they currently have 13/32nds across the entire tread. I drive very gently with no hard acceleration, braking, or turning so these tires were never subject to high forces which may explain the minimal wear. The AT4Ws give me unlimited confidence in the dry, leave me unfazed in the wet, and unconcerned in the snow. I have occasionally taken my truck into the dirt and mud on light trails and never faced difficulty. However, when comparing it to the Hakka R3s I have on my SUV, the snow braking can definitely be improved hence the 7 rating.
As an AT4W owner with 37k KM's (now at roughly 16/32mm of treadlife left), I have a set of LT 285/70/17 on a 2DR Bronco and some days they exceed my expectations and others fall short. I've driven around Ontario, out east around PEI and Nova Scotia, down south through Michigan and Chicago so I've driven them in all elements. For example, driving through a Michigan blizzard, Northern Ontario back-road snow and ice, I felt remarkably comfortable, but city turning in the fall after it's been raining for an hour? I look like "that guy" throwing my back end out or driving through a larger than expected puddle of water, it gets floaty.
I wished I could have gotten a set of AT3W's based on how well they were received, but the AT4W's don't live up to my expectations as a year round tire. Because Ontario gets all 4 seasons, I'll probably end up using these for warm springs/Summer and get a dedicated winter. Perhaps the P-rated spec would've been a better choice for me because of the LT's harder compound and lack of wet performance but I'm not sure.
Pros:
Comfortable
Dead quiet for an AT tire
Deep Snow / Dry Pavement
Off Road
Doesn't throw rocks nearly as bad as the Bridgestone Dueler AT's
Overall generally impressed with the AT4W's, disappointed in its city winter/wet performance but back roads year-round the AT4W excels. This is my first set of 3PMS AT Tire, so I don't have an AT baseline to compare to. Finally, I'd give them a 7.5/10 based on its warm weather performance, off-road capability and deep snow confidence but deductions in wet performance and predictability/confidence.
I bought these tires from a dealer in starbuck mb and they told me they would be better in snow and ice than my geolander all weather tires had been. Well that was a big lie these tires are not good in snow and ice i have had all season radials that were better than these. I am driving along the other day on white ice on the highway with a strong wind. The tires are so poor that my titan was blowing sideways that is down right dangerous it took me in a store parking lot 50 feet to stop in slushy snow from 15 mph. if you need good tires for winter don't buy these I am not sure how they can have the mountain peak snow symbol
