Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT
The Falken Wildpeak AT4W and the Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT have met in one independent test so far, and the Scorpion XTM AT finished ahead. The Scorpion XTM AT was stronger in dry, wet, snow, off road, comfort and value.
Performance profile
16 measurements from the one shared test, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Wildpeak AT4W
Not ahead on any measurement here
Scorpion XTM AT
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 80%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Wildpeak AT4W
Scorpion XTM AT
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Wildpeak AT4W
Scorpion XTM AT
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Wildpeak AT4W 78% from 11 reviews and the Scorpion XTM AT 78% from 6. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tyres' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tyre that did better.
| Measurement | Wildpeak AT4W | Gap | Scorpion XTM AT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Scorpion XTM AT ahead | |||
| Dry Braking m | 44.08 | 7% | 40.99 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | 9.5 | 2.6% | 9.75 |
| Wet Scorpion XTM AT ahead | |||
| Wet Braking m | 42.39 | 15.6% | 35.77 |
| Wet Handling s | 131.2 | 8.5% | 120 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | 7.5 | 18.7% | 8.9 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 95.4 | 6.5% | 101.6 |
| Snow Scorpion XTM AT ahead | |||
| Snow Braking m | 16.21 | 17.2% | 13.42 |
| Snow Traction s | 7.25 | 27.4% | 5.26 |
| Snow Handling s | 88.92 | 7.9% | 81.91 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | 7.7 | 13% | 8.7 |
| Off road Scorpion XTM AT ahead | |||
| Dirt Handling s | 75.18 | 1.5% | 74.05 |
| Subj. Dirt Handling pts | 8.3 | 3.6% | 8.6 |
| Comfort Scorpion XTM AT ahead | |||
| Subj. Comfort pts | 9 | 5.6% | 9.5 |
| Subj. Noise pts | 8.5 | 5.9% | 9 |
| Noise dB | 55.05 | 0.1 dB | 54.95 |
| Value Scorpion XTM AT ahead | |||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 9.8 | 5.1% | 9.3 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Wildpeak AT4W | Field | Scorpion XTM AT |
|---|---|---|---|
| The BEST All Terrain Tyres for 2026 Tested and Rated | P6 of 7 | P1 of 7 |
Wildpeak AT4W vs Scorpion XTM AT: your questions
Is the Falken Wildpeak AT4W or the Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT the better tyre?
The Falken Wildpeak AT4W and the Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT have met in one independent test so far, and the Scorpion XTM AT finished ahead. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Wildpeak AT4W scores 8.3 and the Scorpion XTM AT 8.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Wildpeak AT4W or the Scorpion XTM AT?
The Scorpion XTM AT led 4 of the 4 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Scorpion XTM AT led 2 of the 2 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Scorpion XTM AT led 4 of the 4 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.1/10 for the Wildpeak AT4W and 6.2/10 for the Scorpion XTM AT.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Wildpeak AT4W 78% from 11 reviews and the Scorpion XTM AT 78% from 6. 80% of Wildpeak AT4W owners would buy it again, against 83% for the Scorpion XTM AT.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO3 vs Falken Wildpeak AT4W
2-2 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs Toyo Open Country AT III
2-1 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs Nokian Outpost nAT
0-2 in 2 shared tests
vs 
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO3 vs Pirelli Scorpion XTM AT
0-2 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs Goodyear Wrangler DuraTrac RT
2-1 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Falken Wildpeak AT4W vs Nitto Recon Grappler AT
4-0 in 4 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.