Best Tyres for the Ford F 150

These get very loud and lose some snow traction as they age, as the siping is not full depth. They also wear weird despite rotating every 5k. I've had better luck in other sizes and lighter vehicles with less power.

Another great experience with Sailun Tires. I'd be comparing these to the Yokohama Geolandar H/Ts. Overall it'd be hard to compare the two as I only drove these tires for one spring to fall season each, but I can definitely say that for the price I still prefer the Sailuns. Both were comparable in basic everyday truck driving: commuting, light towing, highway driving, etc... Where the Sailun stood out though is the price and current availability. As of me writing this review this model of Yokohama isn't even available anymore. Sailun in my opinion as a company in Canada is hard to beat; bang for buck wise. With the mileage I've put on the Sailuns I'd say I still have 60-65% left on em'.

Experience for the price was great! I've used these tires in deep Canadian snow on a 2023 Ford F-150. Day-to-day driving is good to great. Well above average commuting experience. On the days I've needed to use the tires in the snow I've never gotten stuck. Obviously I'm driving a 4x4 truck, but they performed to my expectations and exceeding them in a particular experience of mine. Long story short, we had a bad storm and on the freeway people were going 40-60km/hr while I was going 100km/hr; confidently!

I’ve put nearly 30,000 miles on the tires. They are quite noisy and they did not balance well. I had to pay a tire shop extra to Road-Force balance them. The ride is now tolerable. Wet and winter weather traction has been miserable, with only slight improvement as they’ve gotten some wear on them. They’re fine in the dry. I’ve lost at least 2 mpg’s in fuel economy as compared to the OEM tires. I will not be buying these or the updated nAT tires again. Reviews were promising, but the tires have not met expectations.

They're a great Looking tire, very expensive. Have a wear percentage built into the tread, so you can see if you have >80%, >60% etc. left on the tire. That's pretty smart. They pick up small/medium sized stones, all the time. I went poser and got the 33" LT tire on my F150. They're pretty stiff and my stock shocks don't like the extra weight of the tire. They balance well and are good offroad. I've gone through some 12" deep slop while getting into hunting spots and the traction is good.
I live in southern Ontario so we get a lot of freeze/thaw cycles and where I live snow and ice that sometimes sticks around and other times is gone tomorrow. I was banking on gone tomorrow. That hasn't been true the past couple of years. I used to run Blizzak DMV2 for winter use and thought the nAT would be close. Its not close. The DMV2 and the brake activated traction control meant I Very seldom used 4x4 to drive around. With the nAT from a full stop I used 4x4 more this past winter than I have used it in the entire time I have owned this truck (12-years).
I have 3.73 gears and the acceleration from a stop is no longer fun. The slightly taller size and the greater weight just sucks the off the line performance out of the truck. It was never fun to drive, but now its less fun to drive. Fuel economy is also significantly worse - 2L / 100km worse (3mpg).
Road noise is also worse, but its an AT tire, so that's understandable. I just don't like it.
I was hoping to stop having to do winter tire changeovers and get a tire that could do it all. This just proved to me at least, that a dedicated winter tire is worth the expense. I feel safer when I drive around in the winter with a proper winter tire. Stopping a 6k pound truck on ice with a bit of a skid isn't my idea of a good time.
If I lived in an area that saw less winter, (southern Ohio maybe?) then this might be the sort of compromise I would be willing to make.
TLDR - a tough sturdy tire, that isn't the best performer in winter conditions vs a proper winter tire. Looks sharp on the stock wheels.