Menu

BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA

The BFGOODRICH TRAIL-TERRAIN T/A is a mild all-terrain tyre with a 60,000 mile warranty and is severe snow rated (3PMSF.) BFGoodrich claim the Trail Terrain T/A outlasts the Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S by 4,500 miles while offering 11% better snow traction.

7.5
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
90%
Wet Grip
58%
Road Feedback
64%
Handling
64%
Wear
85%
Comfort
66%
Buy again
48%
Snow Grip
95%
Ice Grip
60%
5 Reviews
70% Average
104,500 miles driven
3 Tests (avg: 6th)
BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA

BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA

All Season Mid-Range
BETA
7.5 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Snow
100
1.38x / 8 tests
Off road
90.6
0.68x / 5 tests
Comfort
84.8
0.29x / 3 tests
Value
80.4
0.38x / 1 test
Wet
52
2x / 10 tests
Dry
40.2
1.5x / 4 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
92.5
4 tests
Handling
81.1
10 tests
Braking
70.2
7 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 2
Period: 2022 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 5
Avg Rating: 69.9%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.66
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test ADAC 2025 225/65 R17 8/9 8 metrics
2023/24 Best All Terrain Tyres In Snow Tyre Reviews 2023 275/65 R18 1/9 3 metrics
2022/23 Best 9 All Terrain Tyres Tyre Reviews 2022 275/65 R18 8/9 20 metrics
3
Tests
6th
Average
1st
Best
8th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
8th/9
The BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A stands out for several negative reasons: it is the heaviest and most expensive tyre in the test. It also provides the least driving safety on both wet and dry roads, where it is by far the weakest performer, leading to a major downgrade in its overall score. In stark contrast, the tyre performs surprisingly well on snow, ranking as the second-best in that specific category. The test concludes that this tyre is an extreme example of the difficulty in engineering a single product to perform well in all weather conditions.
Outstanding grip in the snow, best in test.
8th/9
Best off road with fastest lap and excellent handling, low noise, good levels of comfort, very low rolling resistance.
Reduced on-road performance with long braking distances in the dry and wet and low grip in the handling tests.
The BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA was the king of the offroad in this test and is the tire from this group we'd fit if we spent a lot of time offroad. However, it wasn't up to scratch in the dry and wet, and does make us wonder… if you spend a lot of time offroad, why not fit the hugely popular KO2... That said, it does have a very low rolling resistance, so if you want a good off road tyre with low gas use and low noise in the cabin, this is a good choice, just be mindful of it's on road performance.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
15 inch
235/75R15 109 T XL E E 72
16 inch
245/75R16 111 T E E 72
17 inch
265/65R17 112 T D E 72
235/65R17 108 T XL D E 72
225/60R17 99 H E E 72
265/70R17 115 T D E 72
18 inch
235/60R18 107 H XL D E 72
20 inch
275/55R20 113 T D E 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA >>

Questions and Answers for the BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA

Ask a question
March 1, 2023

What is the speed rating on the BF trail terrains? I want to put them on my V6 Amarok

The speed ratings will vary with size, it will be clearly listed on the BF Goodrich website and also any tyre retailer should also list it.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

YouTube Review

Review Summary

Based on 5 user reviews

Drivers report that the BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA offers strong snow/ice traction, off-road toughness, and in some cases good comfort and low noise, but wet-road grip is a significant weakness and road noise often increases with mileage. Fuel economy penalties are commonly noted. Overall sentiment is mixed-to-negative, with one very positive review praising comfort/noise and several mid/low reviews citing poor wet grip and rising noise.

Strengths
  • Snow and ice traction
  • Off-road durability/tough sidewalls
  • Off-road/mud capability
  • Comfort (some reports)
  • Tread life (some reports)
Areas for Improvement
  • Wet grip/traction
  • Road noise (worsens with wear)
  • Fuel economy/rolling resistance

Top 3 BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA Reviews

Given 38% while driving a Toyota 2006 Avalon (265/60 R18) on a combination of roads for 500 average miles
Possibly the worst investment I've ever made. I have a hilux that doubles as a family car. These tyres are not fit for purpose in wet weather. Every corner I turn, the rear wheels are spinning and the ABS was never activated until I fitted these. I am now having to look to fit another brand as I have no confidence in motorway driving with my family on board.
Ask a question | Helpful 827
November 30, 2024
Given 62% while driving a Volkswagen TOUAREG V6 TDI (255/55 R19) on mostly country roads for 20,000 average miles
Had these for just over 2 years and 20,000 miles and they are just on the verge of needing replacing.
I waited this long before doing a review so i'd have lots of genuine information.

Good points:
Snow/Ice = Excellent. I have run them on 3 trips to the Alps with up to a foot of snow and they have been predicable, lots of traction and very sure footed.
Tough = sidewalls have had a fair number of scrapes with granite rocks and they are still perfect.
Mud= surprisingly capable, self clear quite well considering. For instance just spent an afternoon pulling horse boxes out of a show in horrible claggy mud and slippery wet grass. Not as controllable as a KO2 but they kept going....but you could tell they were at their limit.

Bad points:
Noise = started off well, but after about 5K miles, they started to have a solid persistent hum. This is in a premium 4x4 with really good sound insulation, imagine in a pickup etc it would be really bad. They have got steadily worse with age.
Wet grip = terrible, cornering at normal road speeds I have had the traction control coming on way too frequently. I do not have confidence driving these in the rain anymore on the motorway.
Fuel = terrible also, they are noticeably worse than the grabber AT3's I had before.

Summary. They seem to excel in the tougher conditions. Sadly that makes them sort of pointless for me as with their poor road manners and high fuel consumption you might as well just go for a more aggressive AT where i'd be sure they'd work when the going gets really tough. Conversely, If I needed ice and snow and road manners I'd go for a good all season SUV tyre and save a load on fuel and be nice and quiet.
August 11, 2024
Given 66% while driving a Mitsubishi Pajero (265/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,000 average miles
I have been driving them for 4 month in dry conditions and done a fair amount of offroading mainly on gtavel and rocky terrain. While they handle very good they are outragiously noisy when on paved tarmac. I jave previously driven on some other tires on offroaders, such as the pireli scorpion which tobmy opinion can noy be called at tires as they are very volunrable, and toyou open country which i didnt like at all, , and cooper discoverer at3. On my current rig a 2009 pajero diesel, i had toyo open country when i bought it an was happy to replace them and was tempted to go for these bfs afyer having a great experince with bf km3 on a previous rig. Unfortunatly, these are the lodrst tires i have ever driven except for yhe km3s. On any givdn day i would take cooper at3, whicj ate far more quite and very capable off road. Sorry, but while the trail terrain ticks msny noxes they are way too loud. I wont buy thesr again.
September 10, 2023
Have you driven on the BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA >

Latest BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA Reviews

Given 66% while driving a Toyota RAV4 (225/65 R17) on mostly motorways for 76,000 average miles
1st) there is the looks. These tyres looks amazing! You cannot get around that (Silver 2021 RAV4 Hybrid with white letters showing)
2nd) I was impressed with the road noise, or lack thereof. For an AT, these are very quiet.
3rd)tread life looks good. I am currently at 78000km on them and still have 4.5mm left all round. I did not baby them, but mostly do high way driving on tar.
4th) Who ever said in a review that I red when I got them ( there was very little to no reviews as they were brand new) that "they do not increase fuel consumption " was full of ......
Why do I say that? Because there is no reference point as to what the person used before. Did they run KO2's? Then of course there will be no increase in consumption. So my reference is the OEM Bridgestone Alanza HP. Compared the that, I lost 1-1.5km/l with the BF's. Its understandable. Its heavy and it is an AT. I am running 225/65R17 and my current average is 16-16.5km/l
My next set will be high way summer tires again, then I can easily be in the 17's.
5th) The wet grip is BAD. Like really bad! At robots in the rain, touch the throttle to hard and its spinning for days ( I have an 2x4 hybrid)
I once overtook a truck in the wet, and at 60km/l, my car started spinning its wheels. I know the stretch of road very well, so I can confirm that my Bridgestones never did that.

Will I buy again? Probably not. We have no snow, hot climate. Fuel consumption and wet grip is the downfall. We have super bad roads here, but I can cope with an HP tire.
For the looks yes,they rock, but sadly not again for me.

Greetings all the way from South Africa
September 27, 2023
Given 96% while driving a Ford F 150 (275/65 R18) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
Had the TrailTerrain fitted for a few months now and all I can say is wow. Excellent comfort, no noise compared to my normal tires, and while I've not tried them in ice yet in the snow they felt better than my all seasons. Highly recommended.
May 5, 2022
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!