Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Nokian Powerproof 1
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport finished ahead 3 times and the Powerproof 1 not once. The Potenza Sport was stronger in dry, wet and value, the Powerproof 1 in comfort.
Performance profile
6 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Potenza Sport
Powerproof 1
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 90%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 8 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Potenza Sport
Powerproof 1
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Potenza Sport
Powerproof 1
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Potenza Sport 80% from 139 reviews and the Powerproof 1 86% from 4. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Potenza Sport | Gap | Powerproof 1 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Potenza Sport ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 33.37 | 6.8% | 35.8 | 3-0 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 120.6 | 3% | 117.1 | 1-0 |
| Wet Potenza Sport ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 33.17 | 9% | 36.47 | 3-0 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete m | 34.6 | 11.3% | 39 | 1-0 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 73.5 | 2.4% | 71.8 | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle s | 14.55 | 2.9% | 14.99 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 79 | 1% | 79.8 | 0-2 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.07 | 1.9% | 3.02 | 1-1 |
| Comfort Powerproof 1 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Noise dB | 74.2 | 1.7 dB | 72.55 | 0-2 |
| Value Potenza Sport ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 48,190 | 31.5% | 37,160 | 2-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 9.24 | 3.4% | 8.93 | 0-1 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.8 | 5.2% | 5.5 | 0-1 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 63.8 | 5.8% | 67.7 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 3 tests in 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Potenza Sport | Field | Powerproof 1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | P3 of 20 | P17 of 20 | |
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | P2 of 18 | P14 of 18 | |
| 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout | P1 of 52 | P13 of 52 |
Potenza Sport vs Powerproof 1: your questions
Is the Bridgestone Potenza Sport or the Nokian Powerproof 1 the better tyre?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport finished ahead 3 times and the Powerproof 1 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Potenza Sport scores 9.3 and the Powerproof 1 8.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Potenza Sport or the Powerproof 1?
The Potenza Sport led 7 of the 10 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 9% shorter in the wet across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Potenza Sport led 4 of the 4 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 6.8% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Potenza Sport lasted 31.5% longer in the wear tests (2 tests). Owners rate wear 6.1/10 for the Potenza Sport and 8/10 for the Powerproof 1.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Powerproof 1 was 1.7 dB quieter (2 tests). Owners rate comfort 7/10 for the Potenza Sport and 8.8/10 for the Powerproof 1.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Potenza Sport 80% from 139 reviews and the Powerproof 1 86% from 4.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Potenza Sport was the dearer tyre in 2 of them, by 25.4% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Potenza Sport is made in 129 sizes (16 to 24 inch) and the Powerproof 1 in 54 (17 to 20 inch). 45 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Potenza Sport is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Powerproof 1 A and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Powerproof 1 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2023, the Potenza Sport in 2021. The Potenza Sport replaced the Bridgestone Potenza S001. The Powerproof 1 replaced the Nokian PowerProof.
More comparisons with these tyres
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.

