Nokian PowerProof vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Ahead in each discipline
The Nokian PowerProof and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 have met in one independent test so far, and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 finished ahead. The PowerProof was stronger in comfort, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 in dry, wet and value.
Performance profile
9 measurements from the one shared test, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
PowerProof
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 97%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
PowerProof
Not ahead in any category
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
PowerProof
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the PowerProof 80% from 28 reviews and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 86% from 228. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tyres' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tyre that did better.
| Measurement | PowerProof | Gap | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 ahead | |||
| Dry Braking m | 35.3 | 2% | 34.6 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 124.7 | 0.9% | 125.8 |
| Wet Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 ahead | |||
| Wet Braking m | 31.4 | 0.3% | 31.3 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 85.9 | 2.9% | 88.4 |
| Wet Circle m/s | 6.52 | 2.3% | 6.67 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 65.2 | 0.6% | 65.6 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 2.4 | 8.3% | 2.6 |
| Comfort PowerProof ahead | |||
| Noise dB | 69.6 | 0.4 dB | 70 |
| Value Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 ahead | |||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.7 | 1.3% | 7.6 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2022
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | PowerProof | Field | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test | P6 of 10 | P1 of 10 |
PowerProof vs Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: your questions
Is the Nokian PowerProof or the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 the better tyre?
The Nokian PowerProof and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 have met in one independent test so far, and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 finished ahead. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the PowerProof scores 8.4 and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 9.7 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the PowerProof or the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 led 5 of the 5 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 led 2 of the 2 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.6/10 for the PowerProof and 8.3/10 for the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the PowerProof 80% from 28 reviews and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 86% from 228. 73% of PowerProof owners would buy it again, against 83% for the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The PowerProof is made in 42 sizes (17 to 20 inch) and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 in 130 (17 to 23 inch). 36 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the PowerProof is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 A and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
8-5 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
5-11 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental SportContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
5-2 in 8 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
1-5 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Michelin Primacy 5
2-1 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
3-0 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Pirelli P Zero PZ5
0-2 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
8-1 in 9 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.