Falken Rubitrek AT01 vs Sumitomo Encounter AT2
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Falken Rubitrek AT01 finished ahead 1 times and the Encounter AT2 not once, with one level. The Rubitrek AT01 was stronger in comfort, the Encounter AT2 in dry, wet, snow and ice.
Performance profile
15 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Rubitrek AT01
Encounter AT2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
Rubitrek AT01
Encounter AT2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Rubitrek AT01 | Gap | Encounter AT2 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Encounter AT2 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 40.54 | 0.8% | 40.23 | 0-1 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | 6.5% | scored | 0-1 |
| Dry Circle g | 0.73 | 2.8% | 0.71 | 1-0 |
| Subj. Road Score pts | scored | 7.7% | scored | 0-1 |
| Wet Encounter AT2 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 49.38 | 1.2% | 48.77 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling s | 37.88 | 1.2% | 37.44 | 0-1 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 3% | scored | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle g | 0.59 | 1.7% | 0.6 | 0-1 |
| Snow Encounter AT2 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 26.7 | 12% | 23.5 | 0-1 |
| Snow Traction m | 15.59 | 17.9% | 12.8 | 0-1 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Ice Encounter AT2 ahead | ||||
| Ice Braking m | 16.67 | 13.5% | 14.42 | 0-1 |
| Ice Traction s | 6.25 | 2.7% | 6.08 | 0-1 |
| Comfort Rubitrek AT01 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Subj. Noise pts | scored | 17.4% | scored | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 2 tests, 2025 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Rubitrek AT01 | Field | Encounter AT2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test | P23 of 30 | P23 of 30 | |
| 2025 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Test | P4 of 9 | P5 of 9 |
Rubitrek AT01 vs Encounter AT2: your questions
Is the Falken Rubitrek AT01 or the Sumitomo Encounter AT2 the better tyre?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Falken Rubitrek AT01 finished ahead 1 times and the Encounter AT2 not once, with one level. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Rubitrek AT01 scores 5.6 and the Encounter AT2 8.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Rubitrek AT01 or the Encounter AT2?
The Encounter AT2 led 3 of the 4 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Encounter AT2 led 3 of the 4 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Encounter AT2 led 2 of the 3 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Rubitrek AT01 79% from 1 reviews; the Encounter AT2 has no owner reviews yet.
More comparisons with these tyres
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.