Menu
Falken Rubitrek A/T01 View Gallery (1)

Falken Rubitrek A/T01

Falken Tyres All Terrain and Off Road All Season

The Falken Rubitrek AT01 is a All Terrain and Off Road All Season tyre designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

5.9
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
80%
Wet Grip
90%
Road Feedback
70%
Handling
70%
Wear
0%
Comfort
40%
Buy again
100%
Snow Grip
90%
Ice Grip
90%
1 Reviews
79% Average
5,000 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 4th)
Falken Rubitrek AT01

Falken Rubitrek AT01

All Season Mid-Range
BETA
5.9 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Wet
88
2x / 3 tests
Dry
71.6
1.5x / 2 tests
Comfort
71.3
0.29x / 2 tests
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
82.6
3 tests
Braking
81.9
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 1
Avg Rating: 78.8%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.29
History Points: 5
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Test Tire Rack 2025 265/70 R17 4/9 7 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
1
Tests
4th
Average
4th
Best
4th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2025 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Test
265/70 R17 • 2025
4th/9
Falken Rubitrek A/T01 presents itself as a reasonable on-road option, though with some notable caveats that prevent it from being exceptional. The tyre demonstrates strong wet braking capabilities and provides a decent road ride that most drivers would find acceptable for daily use. However, testers found the tyre's wet weather character could be more balanced, and it lacks the dry grip levels that more performance-oriented drivers might desire. While it performs adequately across most conditions, it doesn't particularly excel in any specific area, making it a competent but not standout choice in the all-terrain category.

Questions and Answers for the Falken Rubitrek AT01

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Falken Rubitrek AT01. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Have you driven on the Falken Rubitrek AT01 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Falken Rubitrek AT01? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Falken Rubitrek AT01 >

Latest Falken Rubitrek AT01 Reviews

Given 79% while driving a Chevrolet Suburban (265/70 R16) on mostly motorways for 5,000 spirited miles
Great tires for the price. Half the cost of the AT3W and look mint. So far they do way better than the Coopers I had on my truck prior to this.
Ask a question | Helpful 94
November 11, 2025