Menu

Goodride SW602 vs Viking FourTech

Goodride SW602
Head to head 1-1 wins in 2 shared tests
Viking FourTech

Ahead in each discipline

The Goodride SW602 and the Viking FourTech have met in 2 independent tests and the record is level at 1-1. The SW602 was stronger in dry, the FourTech in wet.

Performance profile

Their shared tests recorded too few of the same measurements to chart, so the chart shows what owners rate each tyre on every question.

Dry GripWet GripRoad FeedbackHandlingWearComfortSnow Grip

Where owners rate each higher

SW602

FourTech

Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.

Owners rate the SW602 88% from 4 reviews and the FourTech 67% from 4. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.

Every measurement, side by side

Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.

Measurement SW602 Gap FourTech Wins
Dry SW602 ahead
Dry Braking m 44.9 2.4% 46 1-0
Wet FourTech ahead
Wet Braking m 54 0.9% 53.5 0-1

Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.

Head to head in 2 tests, 2018 to 2019

Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.

Test SW602 Field FourTech
2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview Auto Bild · 2019 · 225/45 R17 P24 of 31 P25 of 31
2018 27 All Season Tyre Shootout Auto Bild · 2018 · 195/65 R15 P18 of 27 P15 of 27

SW602 vs FourTech: your questions

Is the Goodride SW602 or the Viking FourTech the better tyre?

The Goodride SW602 and the Viking FourTech have met in 2 independent tests and the record is level at 1-1. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the SW602 scores 7.1 and the FourTech 7.2 out of 10.

Which is better in the wet, the SW602 or the FourTech?

The FourTech led 1 of the 1 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.

Which is better in the dry?

The SW602 led 1 of the 1 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.

Which is quieter and more comfortable?

Owners rate comfort 8.5/10 for the SW602 and 6.5/10 for the FourTech.

What do owners say?

Owners rate the SW602 88% from 4 reviews and the FourTech 67% from 4.

More comparisons with these tyres

Run either of these?

Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.

Review the SW602 Review the FourTech

Where this data comes from

Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.

About the TR Score

The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.

Who does the testing

Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.