Linglong Sport Master Winter vs Atlas Polarbear HP
Ahead in each discipline
The Linglong Sport Master Winter and the Atlas Polarbear HP have met in one independent test so far, and the Sport Master Winter finished ahead. The Sport Master Winter was stronger in dry and wet, the Polarbear HP in ice, comfort and value.
Performance profile
12 measurements from the one shared test, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Sport Master Winter
Polarbear HP
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
Sport Master Winter
Polarbear HP
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tyres' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tyre that did better.
| Measurement | Sport Master Winter | Gap | Polarbear HP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Sport Master Winter ahead | |||
| Dry Braking m | 43.3 | 6.1% | 46.1 |
| Wet Sport Master Winter ahead | |||
| Wet Braking m | 37.7 | 22.6% | 48.7 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete m | 40.2 | 24.6% | 53.3 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 83.7 | 7% | 78.2 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 2.9 | 3.4% | 3 |
| Snow Level | |||
| Snow Braking m | 10.9 | 0.9% | 11 |
| Snow Traction N | 2,569 | 8% | 2,775 |
| Ice Polarbear HP ahead | |||
| Ice Braking m | 22.4 | 2.2% | 21.9 |
| Comfort Polarbear HP ahead | |||
| Noise dB | 71.6 | 0.1 dB | 71.5 |
| Value Polarbear HP ahead | |||
| Wear km | 29,000 | 23.4% | 35,800 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.8 | 8.6% | 5.3 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 82 | 23.2% | 63 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Sport Master Winter | Field | Polarbear HP |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | P3 of 16 | P15 of 16 |
Sport Master Winter vs Polarbear HP: your questions
Is the Linglong Sport Master Winter or the Atlas Polarbear HP the better tyre?
The Linglong Sport Master Winter and the Atlas Polarbear HP have met in one independent test so far, and the Sport Master Winter finished ahead. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Sport Master Winter scores 7.3 and the Polarbear HP 3 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Sport Master Winter or the Polarbear HP?
The Sport Master Winter led 3 of the 4 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Sport Master Winter led 1 of the 1 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
Across the shared tests the snow measurements are split 1-1 between the Sport Master Winter and the Polarbear HP.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Sport Master Winter 82% from 4 reviews; the Polarbear HP has no owner reviews yet.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Sport Master Winter is made in 95 sizes (14 to 21 inch) and the Polarbear HP in 19 (13 to 16 inch). 10 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Sport Master Winter is graded A for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Polarbear HP D and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Sport Master Winter is the newer design: it reached the market in 2025, the Polarbear HP in 2020.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Linglong Sport Master Winter vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-5 in 5 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Linglong Sport Master Winter
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Linglong Sport Master Winter
10-1 in 11 shared tests
vs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs Linglong Sport Master Winter
3-1 in 4 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter I cept RS3 vs Linglong Sport Master Winter
4-0 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Linglong Sport Master Winter vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
2-4 in 6 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Linglong Sport Master Winter
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs Linglong Sport Master Winter
1-5 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.