Menu

Hankook Winter i cept RS2 vs Goodyear UltraGrip 9+

In the 5 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Hankook Winter i cept RS2 finished ahead 3 times and the UltraGrip 9+ twice. The Winter i cept RS2 was stronger in dry and wet, the UltraGrip 9+ in snow and value.

Performance profile

6 measurements from the 5 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.

Dry BrakingWet BrakingStraight AquaSnow BrakingSnow TractionRolling Resistance

Where each is furthest ahead

Winter i cept RS2

UltraGrip 9+

Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.

In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 11 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.

Every measurement, side by side

Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.

Measurement Winter i cept RS2 Gap UltraGrip 9+ Wins
Dry Winter i cept RS2 ahead
Dry Braking m 45.9 4.5% 48.05 2-0
Dry Handling km/h 136.5 0.5% 135.8 1-0
Subj. Dry Handling pts scored = scored 0-0
Wet Winter i cept RS2 ahead
Wet Braking m 46.9 3.6% 48.53 3-0
Wet Handling km/h 73 1.8% 71.7 1-0
Subj. Wet Handling pts scored = scored 0-0
Wet Circle s 12.64 0.2% 12.66 1-0
Straight Aqua km/h 84.85 4.1% 81.55 2-0
Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 3.18 2.8% 3.27 0-1
Snow UltraGrip 9+ ahead
Snow Braking m 27.47 1.5% 27.03 1-2
Snow Traction N 2,495 0.8% 2,515 0-2
Snow Handling km/h 57.9 2.7% 56.4 1-0
Subj. Snow Handling pts scored 50% scored 0-1
Comfort Level
Subj. Comfort pts scored 11.1% scored 0-1
Noise dB 69.8 1.5 dB 71.3 1-0
Value UltraGrip 9+ ahead
Wear km 32,900 11.2% 36,600 0-1
Rolling Resistance kg / t 9.26 10.8% 8.26 0-2

Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.

Head to head in 5 tests, 2020 to 2021

Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.

Test Winter i cept RS2 Field UltraGrip 9+
2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild · 2021 · 205/55 R16 P6 of 20 P7 of 20
2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild · 2021 · 205/55 R16 P3 of 50 P6 of 50
The Best Winter Tyres for 2020 Tyre Reviews · 2020 · 205/55 R16 Tyre Reviews test P3 of 19 P2 of 19
2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test Auto Zeitung · 2020 · 205/55 R16 P4 of 14 P3 of 14
2020 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 ADAC · 2020 · 205/55 R16 P4 of 15 P8 of 15

Winter i cept RS2 vs UltraGrip 9+: your questions

Is the Hankook Winter i cept RS2 or the Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ the better tyre?

In the 5 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Hankook Winter i cept RS2 finished ahead 3 times and the UltraGrip 9+ twice. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Winter i cept RS2 scores 9 and the UltraGrip 9+ 9.4 out of 10.

Which is better in the wet, the Winter i cept RS2 or the UltraGrip 9+?

The Winter i cept RS2 led 7 of the 9 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.6% shorter in the wet across 3 tests.

Which is better in the dry?

The Winter i cept RS2 led 3 of the 4 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.5% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.

Which is better in snow?

The UltraGrip 9+ led 5 of the 7 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.5% shorter on snow across 3 tests.

Which lasts longer and costs less to run?

The UltraGrip 9+ had 10.8% lower rolling resistance (2 tests). Owners rate wear 8.5/10 for the Winter i cept RS2 and 9.7/10 for the UltraGrip 9+.

Which is quieter and more comfortable?

Owners rate comfort 7.5/10 for the Winter i cept RS2 and 8.5/10 for the UltraGrip 9+.

What do owners say?

Owners rate the Winter i cept RS2 81% from 50 reviews and the UltraGrip 9+ 88% from 6. 80% of Winter i cept RS2 owners would buy it again, against 100% for the UltraGrip 9+.

Which is more expensive?

In the 2 tests that listed prices, the UltraGrip 9+ was the dearer tyre in 2 of them, by 8.6% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.

Are they available in the same sizes?

The Winter i cept RS2 is made in 43 sizes (13 to 17 inch) and the UltraGrip 9+ in 19 (14 to 16 inch). 17 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Winter i cept RS2 is graded C for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the UltraGrip 9+ B and C.

Run either of these?

Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.

Review the Winter i cept RS2 Review the UltraGrip 9+

Where this data comes from

Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.

About the TR Score

The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.

Who does the testing

Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.