Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Petlas SnowMaster 2 Sport
The Hankook Winter i cept evo3 and the Petlas SnowMaster 2 Sport have met in one independent test so far, and the Winter i cept evo3 finished ahead. The Winter i cept evo3 was stronger in dry, wet, snow and value, the SnowMaster 2 Sport in ice and comfort.
Performance profile
12 measurements from the one shared test, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Winter i cept evo3
SnowMaster 2 Sport
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 75%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Winter i cept evo3
SnowMaster 2 Sport
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Winter i cept evo3
SnowMaster 2 Sport
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Winter i cept evo3 86% from 23 reviews and the SnowMaster 2 Sport 77% from 3. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tyres' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tyre that did better.
| Measurement | Winter i cept evo3 | Gap | SnowMaster 2 Sport |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Winter i cept evo3 ahead | |||
| Dry Braking m | 43.7 | 0.5% | 43.9 |
| Wet Winter i cept evo3 ahead | |||
| Wet Braking m | 32.9 | 7.3% | 35.5 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete m | 37.5 | 8.5% | 41 |
| Wet Circle m/s | 2.9 | 45% | 2 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 74 | 12.5% | 65.8 |
| Snow Winter i cept evo3 ahead | |||
| Snow Braking m | 9.7 | 6.7% | 10.4 |
| Snow Traction N | 238 | 7.2% | 222 |
| Ice SnowMaster 2 Sport ahead | |||
| Ice Braking m | 17.4 | 2.9% | 16.9 |
| Comfort SnowMaster 2 Sport ahead | |||
| Noise dB | 75.3 | 2 dB | 73.3 |
| Value Winter i cept evo3 ahead | |||
| Wear km | 72,400 | 56.4% | 46,300 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.7 | 1.8% | 5.6 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 56 | 21.1% | 71 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Winter i cept evo3 | Field | SnowMaster 2 Sport |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test | P4 of 31 | P23 of 31 |
Winter i cept evo3 vs SnowMaster 2 Sport: your questions
Is the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 or the Petlas SnowMaster 2 Sport the better tyre?
The Hankook Winter i cept evo3 and the Petlas SnowMaster 2 Sport have met in one independent test so far, and the Winter i cept evo3 finished ahead. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Winter i cept evo3 scores 9.2 and the SnowMaster 2 Sport 6.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Winter i cept evo3 or the SnowMaster 2 Sport?
The Winter i cept evo3 led 4 of the 4 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Winter i cept evo3 led 1 of the 1 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Winter i cept evo3 led 2 of the 2 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.8/10 for the Winter i cept evo3 and 7.3/10 for the SnowMaster 2 Sport.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Winter i cept evo3 86% from 23 reviews and the SnowMaster 2 Sport 77% from 3.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Winter i cept evo3 is made in 86 sizes (17 to 22 inch) and the SnowMaster 2 Sport in 108 (13 to 22 inch). 41 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Winter i cept evo3 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the SnowMaster 2 Sport B and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
5-1 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
1-18 in 20 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
12-0 in 13 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8-5 in 14 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
13-3 in 17 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2-6 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Uniroyal WinterExpert
5-1 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.