Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
- TR Score
- 9.3/10
- Owners say
- 85% · 33
- TR Score
- 9.2/10
- Owners say
- 86% · 23
In the 17 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P finished ahead 13 times and the Winter i cept evo3 3 times, with one level. The WinterContact TS 870 P had 9.4% lower rolling resistance; the Winter i cept evo3 held 6.9% more grip in curved aquaplaning.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Continental TS 870 P for balanced, quiet, efficient daily use (including EVs) with strong dry/wet security. Choose Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 for frequent snow/ice, heavy rain with standing water, and best overall value.
Where the WinterContact TS 870 P is stronger
- Class-leading rolling resistance; frequent test best (up to ~10-19% advantage vs Hankook)
- Consistently strong dry and wet braking/handling with precise control
- Lowest external noise and higher comfort scores across most tests
Where the Winter i cept evo3 is stronger
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved) and strong wet security
- Better ice performance (braking/traction) in multiple tests
- Often stronger on snow braking/traction; confident winter feel
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
WinterContact TS 870 P vs Winter i cept evo3 at a glance
| Category | WinterContact TS 870 P | Gap | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won17 shared tests | 13 | 1 level | 3 |
| Dry30 measurements | 20 | The WinterContact TS 870 P stopped 1.1% shorter in the dry (14 tests) | 7 |
| Wet71 measurements | 35 | The WinterContact TS 870 P stopped 1.4% shorter in the wet (17 tests) | 34 |
| Snow57 measurements | 27 | The Winter i cept evo3 was 1.9% quicker in the snow traction test (4 tests) | 28 |
| Ice3 measurements | 0 | The Winter i cept evo3 stopped 8.9% shorter on ice (2 tests) | 3 |
| Comfort19 measurements | 19 | The WinterContact TS 870 P was 2.4 dB quieter (13 tests) | 0 |
| Value19 measurements | 15 | The WinterContact TS 870 P had 9.4% lower rolling resistance (13 tests) | 4 |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.3/10 | The WinterContact TS 870 P by 0.1 | 9.2/10 |
| Owner rating33 and 23 reviews | 85% | Too close to call | 86% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 83% | The Winter i cept evo3 by 8 points | 91% |
| Pricein the 15 tests that listed prices | +28.9% | The WinterContact TS 870 P was dearer in 15 of 15 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 121 | 40 sizes made in both | 86 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 17 tests, 2021 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | WinterContact TS 870 P | Field | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test | P4 of 12 | P8 of 12 | |
| 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | P7 of 20 | P6 of 20 | |
| 2025 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 52 Sets! | P13 of 51 | P14 of 51 | |
| 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test | P6 of 31 | P4 of 31 | |
| 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 12 | P5 of 12 | |
| 2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test | P3 of 10 | P6 of 10 | |
| The BEST Performance Winter Tyres for 2024 / 2025 | P4 of 6 | P4 of 6 | |
| 2023/24 Tyre Reviews UHP Winter Tyre Test | P1 of 6 | P4 of 6 | |
| 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test | P4 of 9 | P6 of 9 | |
| 2023 Sports Cars Winter Tyre Test | P3 of 11 | P4 of 11 | |
| 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P3 of 20 | P6 of 20 | |
| 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test | P7 of 54 | P8 of 54 | |
| 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | P3 of 11 | P4 of 11 | |
| 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test | P3 of 9 | P1 of 9 | |
| 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 10 | P5 of 10 | |
| 2022 Winter Tyre Market Overview | P2 of 56 | P9 of 56 | |
| 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | P1 of 9 | P3 of 9 |
Performance profile
25 measurements from the 17 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
WinterContact TS 870 P
Winter i cept evo3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 7 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
WinterContact TS 870 P
Winter i cept evo3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
WinterContact TS 870 P
Winter i cept evo3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the WinterContact TS 870 P 85% from 33 reviews and the Winter i cept evo3 86% from 23. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | WinterContact TS 870 P | Gap | Winter i cept evo3 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42.78 | 1.1% | 43.26 | 10-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 64.53 | 0.5% | 64.83 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 107.1 | 0.7% | 106.3 | 6-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 2.1% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 39.8 | 1.4% | 40.45 | 10-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 29.97 | 2.9% | 30.9 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 38 | 1.3% | 37.5 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 33.2 | 4% | 34.6 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 75.74 | 0.9% | 76.63 | 3-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 80.52 | 0.4% | 80.26 | 5-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 4.6% | scored | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | 3.4% | 5.08 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.03 | 1% | 14.15 | 4-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 81.64 | 1.6% | 82.9 | 5-9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9.62 | 6.9% | 9.84 | 2-10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 24.16 | 0.1% | 24.2 | 6-10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.28 | 1.9% | 6.15 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2,180 | 0.5% | 2,166 | 4-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 83.97 | 0.9% | 83.19 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 59.14 | 0.7% | 58.73 | 5-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 0.8% | scored | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 34.76 | 0.2% | 34.69 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2.89 | 1.4% | 2.85 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.42 | 2.6% | 3.32 | 8-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.62 | 8.9% | 13.49 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.32 | 13% | 4.63 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 7.7% | scored | 6-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 71.13 | 2.4 dB | 73.5 | 13-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 40,564 | 9.9% | 46,057 | 2-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.93 | 9.4% | 8.78 | 12-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.6 | 1.8% | 5.7 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 60 | 6.7% | 56 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the WinterContact TS 870 P scores 9.3 and the Winter i cept evo3 9.2 out of 10.
| WinterContact TS 870 P | Category | Winter i cept evo3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 94 | Dry | 77 | ||
| 92 | Wet | 89 | ||
| 77 | Comfort | 11 | ||
| 76 | Value | 57 | ||
| 73 | Snow | 68 | ||
| 30 | Ice | 63 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| WinterContact TS 870 P | Category | Winter i cept evo3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.6 | Dry Grip | 9 | ||
| 9 | Wet Grip | 9 | ||
| 8.1 | Road Feedback | 7.8 | ||
| 8.7 | Handling | 8.4 | ||
| 8.7 | Wear | 8.8 | ||
| 8.9 | Comfort | 7.8 | ||
| 8.7 | Snow Grip | 9.4 | ||
| 7.8 | Ice Grip | 8.5 | ||
Owners rate the WinterContact TS 870 P 85% from 33 reviews and the Winter i cept evo3 86% from 23. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
- 85%from 33 reviews
- 83%would buy again
- 294,700 milesdriven by reviewers
Across 26 owner reviews averaging 85.8%, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P is most consistently praised for strong, confidence-inspiring grip in both the wet and the dry, often paired with a notably quiet, comfortable ride. Many owners also report good longevity for a winter tyre, with several noting healthy tread remaining after substantial mileage. Winter performance is generally rated as capable, but a meaningful minority (around two in five of those mentioning it) found snow traction lacking, and opinions are split on ice grip and steering feel; a small number also note it can feel softer when temperatures rise.
- Strong wet grip and confident wet cornering
- Strong dry grip with secure traction
- Noticeably quiet on the road
- Comfortable, supple ride quality
- Snow traction not as strong as expected for some drivers
- Ice grip is inconsistent depending on conditions
- Steering feel not the sharpest
Summarised by AI from 26 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 33 WinterContact TS 870 P reviewsI've driven the tyres in the winter, but on roads devoid of snow and ice so I can't comment on that. They made me feel very secure, however, I have to say that they are far too sporty for my driving style and needs. They carry a lot of responsibility for my decision to buy the car, as they are very comfortable, quiet and make the car feel very surefooted and responsive in the dry and in the wet.
There is one gripe, though, they have absolutely no rim protection, so I blame them for all the scratching on my wheels. I would expect more from a tyre of this class from a reputable brand, and, honestly, it is a strong enough reason (albeit the only one) for me not to buy them again. In every other aspect they are brilliant, they even equal summer tyres in fuel consumption.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
- 86%from 23 reviews
- 91%would buy again
- 164,670 milesdriven by reviewers
Across 20 reviews, the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 is described as a highly confidence-inspiring winter tyre with standout traction in snow and strong, predictable grip in wet conditions (often praised for stability and aquaplaning resistance). Many drivers also report good dry-road handling for a winter tyre and consider it excellent value versus premium brands. A smaller minority mention increased road noise or a firmer/less comfortable ride compared with their summer tyres, but this is not the dominant experience.
- Excellent snow traction and confidence in winter conditions
- Strong wet grip and high aquaplaning resistance
- Stable, predictable handling and good road feedback
- Good comfort and generally low noise for a winter tyre
- Some users find it noisier than summer tyres or typical winter tyre buzzing
Summarised by AI from 20 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 23 Winter i cept evo3 reviewsI used these Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 tires for 4 full winter seasons on a Jeep Compass 2.0 Multijet 4x4. They lasted for roughly 5,500 miles (around 8,900 km). The grip held up exceptionally well as they wore down, providing consistent traction and stability for an AWD SUV in various winter conditions. They offer great value and reliable performance, and I would absolutely buy them again.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 121 sizes of the WinterContact TS 870 P and 86 of the Winter i cept evo3, 40 of them made in both.
| Category | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Winter | Winter |
| Sizes made | 121 sizes, 16 to 23 inch | 86 sizes, 17 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 40 sizes 215/60 R17225/60 R17235/45 R17235/50 R17245/55 R17205/40 R18215/40 R18215/45 R18215/50 R18215/55 R18225/40 R18225/45 R18and 28 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B99%C1% | B98%C1%D1% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C62%B37%D1% | C57%D42%B1% |
| EU label noise | 70-75 dB B100% | 70-75 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 221 of 221 | 124 of 124 |
| On the market since | - | 2021 |
| Replaced | Continental WinterContact TS 860 S (2017) | Hankook Winter i cept evo2 |
| Replaced by | Continental WinterContact 8 S | - |
| Awards | Highly Recommended: Best Winter SUV Tyre (DriverReviews, 2025/26) Winner: Best Winter SUV Tyres (DriverReviews, 2024/25) Winner: Winter Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2024) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The WinterContact TS 870 P was the dearer tyre in 15 of the 15 tests that listed prices, by 28.9% on average. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head pits two UHP winter heavyweights against each other: Continental's WinterContact TS 870 P and Hankook's Winter i*cept evo3. Across 16 shared professional tests from 2021-2025, both deliver capable cold-weather performance, but they prioritize different strengths and value propositions.
The TS 870 P consistently excels in dry and wet control, comfort, noise, and efficiency, often ranking near the top for braking and handling with class-leading rolling resistance. The Hankook counters with strong aquaplaning reserves, competitive wet stopping, and repeatedly superior performance on ice and in several snow metrics-while undercutting Continental on purchase price and predicted mileage in multiple test programs.
Conclusion
If you want the most rounded UHP winter tyre with excellent everyday manners, the Continental TS 870 P is the safer bet: it brakes and handles very well on dry and wet roads, rides quieter and more comfortably, and delivers the lowest rolling resistance in class-an advantage for fuel economy and EV range. Its main caveat is ice performance, where it trails the best, and a premium price.
The Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 offers standout value and winter-road security. It repeatedly tops aquaplaning tests, matches or narrowly trails in wet braking, and has the edge on ice and often in snow braking/traction-while typically costing less and, in some tests, promising higher mileage. Its trade-offs are higher noise, slightly weaker comfort, and less efficiency.
Bottom line: Continental for balanced, efficient, quiet all-round performance and regular wet/dry commuting; Hankook for drivers prioritizing snow/ice confidence and strong aquaplaning safety at a keener price.
WinterContact TS 870 P vs Winter i cept evo3: your questions
Is the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P or the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 the better tyre?
In the 17 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P finished ahead 13 times and the Winter i cept evo3 3 times, with one level. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the WinterContact TS 870 P scores 9.3 and the Winter i cept evo3 9.2 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the WinterContact TS 870 P or the Winter i cept evo3?
The WinterContact TS 870 P led 35 of the 71 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.4% shorter in the wet across 17 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The WinterContact TS 870 P led 20 of the 30 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.1% shorter in the dry across 14 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Winter i cept evo3 led 28 of the 57 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it was 1.9% quicker in the snow traction test across 4 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The WinterContact TS 870 P had 9.4% lower rolling resistance (13 tests). Owners rate wear 8.7/10 for the WinterContact TS 870 P and 8.8/10 for the Winter i cept evo3.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The WinterContact TS 870 P was 2.4 dB quieter (13 tests). Owners rate comfort 8.9/10 for the WinterContact TS 870 P and 7.8/10 for the Winter i cept evo3.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the WinterContact TS 870 P 85% from 33 reviews and the Winter i cept evo3 86% from 23. 83% of WinterContact TS 870 P owners would buy it again, against 91% for the Winter i cept evo3.
Which is more expensive?
In the 15 tests that listed prices, the WinterContact TS 870 P was the dearer tyre in 15 of them, by 28.9% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The WinterContact TS 870 P is made in 121 sizes (16 to 23 inch) and the Winter i cept evo3 in 86 (17 to 22 inch). 40 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the WinterContact TS 870 P is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Winter i cept evo3 B and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
8-16 in 25 shared tests
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3-14 in 21 shared tests
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Michelin Alpin 7
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
5-9 in 15 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
5-1 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
1-2 in 4 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
1-18 in 20 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
12-0 in 13 shared tests
Every Continental vs Hankook test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tyres →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the WinterContact TS 870 P Review the Winter i cept evo3
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion