Menu

Linglong Sport Master Winter vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

This head-to-head pits the budget-leaning Linglong Sport Master Winter against the ultra-high-performance-oriented Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus. Across five shared European winter tests, the Vredestein typically finishes higher overall, while the Linglong repeatedly posts quicker dry stops and laps-an unusual split for a winter matchup.
Expect a trade-off: Linglong brings eye-catching dry braking and competitive pricing, but inconsistent snow security, higher noise, and higher running costs. Vredestein counters with stronger wet-road control, better rolling resistance, and lower noise, yet shows soft spots in dry braking that hold it back from the class leaders.
Sport-Master-Winter VS Wintrac-Pro-plus

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of five total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Linglong Sport Master Wintertwo
two wins
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plusthree
three wins

While it might look like the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus is better than the Linglong Sport Master Winter purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Best-in-test trend in dry braking and dry handling across sizes
  • Often shorter wet braking distances versus Vredestein
  • Strong value per 1,000 km in multiple tests
  • Good curved/straight aquaplaning in some sizes and solid snow cornering laps
  • Consistently superior wet handling, stability, and steering precision
  • Lower rolling resistance and generally lower noise
  • More composed, predictable behaviour on snow (traction/subjective control)
  • Better overall test finishes and broader balance across conditions

Dry Braking

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master Winter stopped the vehicle in 3.84% less distance than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
41.02M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
42.66M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Linglong Sport Master Winter

Linglong Sport Master Winter
31.98M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
32.75M (+0.77M)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
44.5M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
46.4M (+1.9M)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
44.2M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
46.9M (+2.7M)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
43.4M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
44.6M (+1.2M)

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master Winter was 2.37% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
66.6s
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
68.22s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Linglong Sport Master Winter

Linglong Sport Master Winter
58s
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
59.73s (+1.73s)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
75.2s
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
76.7s (+1.5s)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master Winter was 1.16% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
112.4Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
111.1Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Linglong Sport Master Winter

Linglong Sport Master Winter
109.6Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
107.8Km/H (-1.8Km/H)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
115.2Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
114.4Km/H (-0.8Km/H)

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master Winter scored 27.27% more points than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
16.5 Points
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
12 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Linglong Sport Master Winter

Linglong Sport Master Winter
8 Points (-1 Points)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
9 Points
Linglong Sport Master Winter
25 Points
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
15 Points (-10 Points)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master Winter stopped the vehicle in 0.86% less distance than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
42.69M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
43.06M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Linglong Sport Master Winter

Linglong Sport Master Winter
36.34M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
37.8M (+1.46M)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
32.2M (+0.3M)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
31.9M
Linglong Sport Master Winter
35.7M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
36M (+0.3M)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
55.8M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
56.3M (+0.5M)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
53.4M (+0.1M)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
53.3M

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was 2.18% faster around a wet lap than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
75.32s
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
73.68s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Linglong Sport Master Winter
61.54s (+0.69s)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
60.85s
Linglong Sport Master Winter
89.1s (+2.6s)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
86.5s

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was 2.64% faster around a wet lap than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
71.95Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
73.9Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Linglong Sport Master Winter
63.7Km/H (-1.9Km/H)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
65.6Km/H
Linglong Sport Master Winter
80.2Km/H (-2Km/H)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
82.2Km/H

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was better during two subj. wet handling tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus scored 31.11% more points than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
15.5 Points
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
22.5 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Linglong Sport Master Winter
6 Points (-4 Points)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
10 Points
Linglong Sport Master Winter
25 Points (-10 Points)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
35 Points

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was 1.58% faster around a wet circle than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
12.67s
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
12.47s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Linglong Sport Master Winter
12.66s (+0.36s)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
12.3s
Linglong Sport Master Winter
12.67s (+0.04s)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
12.63s

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus floated at a 0.66% higher speed than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
80.85Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
81.39Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Linglong Sport Master Winter
90.29Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
87.34Km/H (-2.95Km/H)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
73.6Km/H (-4.7Km/H)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
78.3Km/H
Linglong Sport Master Winter
71.6Km/H (-0.1Km/H)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
71.7Km/H
Linglong Sport Master Winter
87.9Km/H (-0.3Km/H)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
88.2Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master Winter slipped out at a 1.89% higher speed than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
35.54m/sec2
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
34.87m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Linglong Sport Master Winter

Linglong Sport Master Winter
97.36m/sec2
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
95.11m/sec2 (-2.25m/sec2)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
7.27m/sec2 (-0.15m/sec2)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
7.42m/sec2
Linglong Sport Master Winter
2m/sec2 (-0.09m/sec2)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
2.09m/sec2

Snow Braking

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was better during two snow braking tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus stopped the vehicle in 0.87% less distance than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
31.07M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
30.8M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Linglong Sport Master Winter
40.94M (+0.25M)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
40.69M
Linglong Sport Master Winter
29.4M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
29.6M (+0.2M)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
28.7M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
28.7M
Linglong Sport Master Winter
28.7M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
28.7M
Linglong Sport Master Winter
27.6M (+1.3M)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
26.3M

Snow Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus accelerated 4.44% faster than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
11.04s
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
10.55s
Snow acceleration time, lower is better

Best In Snow Traction: Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Linglong Sport Master Winter
11.04s (+0.49s)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
10.55s

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus had 2.97% better snow traction than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
2715.5N
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
2798.5N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Linglong Sport Master Winter
2341N (-146N)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
2487N
Linglong Sport Master Winter
3090N (-20N)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
3110N

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master Winter was 0.75% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
67.79s
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
68.3s
Snow handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Linglong Sport Master Winter

Linglong Sport Master Winter
63.97s
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
65.5s (+1.53s)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
71.6s (+0.5s)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
71.1s

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master Winter was 0.2% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
75.8Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
75.65Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Linglong Sport Master Winter

Linglong Sport Master Winter
94Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
93.7Km/H (-0.3Km/H)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
57.6Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
57.6Km/H

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was better during two subj. snow handling tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus scored 22.22% more points than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
10.5 Points
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
13.5 Points
Subjective Snow Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Linglong Sport Master Winter
6 Points (-2 Points)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
8 Points
Linglong Sport Master Winter
15 Points (-4 Points)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
19 Points

Snow Circle

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter was better during two snow circle tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master Winter provided 0.83% more lateral grip than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
3.61ms/2
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
3.58ms/2
Lateral snow grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Snow Circle: Linglong Sport Master Winter

Linglong Sport Master Winter
3.76ms/2
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
3.73ms/2 (-0.03ms/2)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
3.46ms/2
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
3.43ms/2 (-0.03ms/2)

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master Winter was 1.07% faster through a slalom than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
2.8m/sec2
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
2.77m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Linglong Sport Master Winter

Linglong Sport Master Winter
2.8m/sec2
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
2.77m/sec2 (-0.03m/sec2)

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus scored 5.95% more points than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
7.43 Points
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
7.9 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Linglong Sport Master Winter
7 Points (-2 Points)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
9 Points
Linglong Sport Master Winter
7.3 Points
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
6.7 Points (-0.6 Points)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
8 Points
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
8 Points

Noise

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was better during three noise tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus measured 1.24% quieter than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
71.51dB
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
70.62dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Linglong Sport Master Winter
70.85dB (+0.57dB)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
70.28dB
Linglong Sport Master Winter
73.1dB (+0.2dB)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
72.9dB
Linglong Sport Master Winter
65.9dB
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
66.9dB (+1dB)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
76.2dB (+3.8dB)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
72.4dB

Wear

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter was better during one wear tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master Winter is predicted to cover 7.68% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
37305KM
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
34440KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Linglong Sport Master Winter

Linglong Sport Master Winter
46110KM
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
37630KM (-8480KM)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
28500KM (-2750KM)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
31250KM

Value

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master Winter was better during two value tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master Winter proved to have a 44.83% better value based on price/1000km than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
5.6Price/1000
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
10.15Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Linglong Sport Master Winter

Linglong Sport Master Winter
7.81Price/1000
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
13.29Price/1000 (+5.48Price/1000)
Linglong Sport Master Winter
3.38Price/1000
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
7Price/1000 (+3.62Price/1000)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus had a 10.29% lower rolling resistance than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
9.72kg / t
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
8.72kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Linglong Sport Master Winter
10.7kg / t (+1.83kg / t)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
8.87kg / t
Linglong Sport Master Winter
8.2kg / t (+0.2kg / t)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
8kg / t
Linglong Sport Master Winter
10.37kg / t (+1.06kg / t)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
9.31kg / t
Linglong Sport Master Winter
9.6kg / t (+0.9kg / t)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
8.7kg / t

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus wore 9.09% less per 1000km driven than the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Linglong Sport Master Winter
0.22mm/1000km
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
0.2mm/1000km
Millimetre of tread lost per 1000km driven, lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Linglong Sport Master Winter
0.215mm/1000km (+0.01mm/1000km)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
0.201mm/1000km

Real World Driver Reviews

Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Linglong Sport Master Winter and Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus.

In total the Linglong Sport Master Winter has been reviewed 3 times and drivers have given the tyre 83% overall.

The Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tyre 0% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Linglong Sport Master Winter.

Best Review for the Linglong Sport Master Winter
Given 80% 255/40 R19 on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
First impressions of the tyre are very satisfactory. They perform well on dry and wet roads. I haven't had a chance to test them on snow and ice yet. Comfort is good, but as expected, the tyres are noisy and the car consumes more fuel with winter tyres than with summer tyres.

At the time of purchase, the tyres were 3x cheaper than mid brands and even 5x cheaper than premium brands. That's why I decided to buy them and check whether it is necessary to buy expensive tyres for normal driving conditions and usual driving style. My conclusion is that Linglong sport master winter... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 130 - tyre reviewed on January 1, 2026
View all Linglong Sport Master Winter driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus
View all Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus driver reviews >>

Conclusion

Patterns are clear across tests: Linglong dominates dry metrics (4/4 dry braking wins; 4/4 dry handling wins) and often edges wet braking, but it trails decisively in wet handling/control and snow traction/subjective feel-critical safety areas in real winter. It's also louder with higher rolling resistance, and professional testers question its consistency and snow safety, despite sporadic strong showings and attractive cost per 1,000 km.
Vredestein is the safer all-rounder for typical European winters: better wet handling balance (wins 4/4), stronger aquaplaning resistance and rolling efficiency (wins 4/4 RR), lower noise, and more trustworthy snow behaviour. Its main drawback is longer dry braking than Linglong and middling value versus top-tier rivals. For drivers facing frequent rain and mixed winter roads, Vredestein provides the more confidence-inspiring package; Linglong suits budget buyers in milder climates prioritising dry performance, accepting compromises on snow security and efficiency.
Key Differences
  • Dry performance: Linglong repeatedly stops shorter and laps faster; Vredestein trails in dry braking.
  • Wet handling: Vredestein wins all comparative handling metrics; Linglong can brake well but feels less stable.
  • Snow security: Vredestein shows better traction and subjective control; Linglong flagged for weak snow braking in several reports.
  • Efficiency: Vredestein has markedly lower rolling resistance; Linglong runs heavier and louder.
  • Comfort/noise: Vredestein is generally quieter and more comfortable; Linglong can feel harsher and noisier.
  • Value picture: Linglong is cheaper with strong cost-per-km, but consistency and winter safety trade-offs reduce appeal; Vredestein costs more yet offers a safer, more rounded winter package.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Overall Winner: Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.