Menu

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 vs Michelin X Ice North 4

This head-to-head pits two Nordic-focused premium-touring winter tyres against each other: Falken's Winterpeak F Snow 1 and Michelin's X-Ice North 4. Across two independent 2025 winter tests in 205/55 R16 and 235/45 R18, Michelin finished ahead overall in both, but with some notable caveats.

The data shows a clear split in priorities: Michelin consistently delivers class-leading ice performance, while Falken trades ultimate winter grip for better comfort, lower noise, and marginally better economy and dry/wet braking in milder conditions. If your winter drives swing between glassy ice and mixed asphalt, the choice hinges on which compromise you can live with.
Winterpeak-F-Snow-1 VS X-Ice-North-4

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been two tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of two total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Michelin X Ice North 4two
two wins

While it might look like the Michelin X Ice North 4 is better than the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Lower noise and better comfort (9/10 noise; comfort lead in R18 test)
  • Slightly better dry and wet braking (e.g., 30.8 m dry; 37.5 m wet)
  • Marginally better fuel use (≈0.4% advantage in R18 test)
  • Predictable on-limit behavior with stable rear on ice
  • Class-leading ice performance (−21% ice braking distance; +29% ice traction)
  • Better wet/aquaplaning balance (faster wet handling and higher straight aqua speed)
  • Good stability in extremes despite slow steering
  • Consistent top-5 overall results in both tests

Dry Braking

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 was better during one dry braking tests. On average the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 stopped the vehicle in 4.05% less distance than the Michelin X Ice North 4.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
30.8M
Michelin X Ice North 4
32.1M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
30.8M
Michelin X Ice North 4
32.1M (+1.3M)

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice North 4 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Michelin X Ice North 4 scored 12.5% more points than the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
7 Points
Michelin X Ice North 4
8 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Michelin X Ice North 4

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
7 Points (-1 Points)
Michelin X Ice North 4
8 Points

Wet Braking

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 was better during one wet braking tests. On average the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 stopped the vehicle in 0.79% less distance than the Michelin X Ice North 4.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
37.5M
Michelin X Ice North 4
37.8M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
37.5M
Michelin X Ice North 4
37.8M (+0.3M)

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice North 4 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin X Ice North 4 was 0.24% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
41.4s
Michelin X Ice North 4
41.3s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Michelin X Ice North 4

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
41.4s (+0.1s)
Michelin X Ice North 4
41.3s

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice North 4 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Michelin X Ice North 4 scored 7.69% more points than the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
6 Points
Michelin X Ice North 4
6.5 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Michelin X Ice North 4

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
7 Points
Michelin X Ice North 4
7 Points
Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
5 Points (-1 Points)
Michelin X Ice North 4
6 Points

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice North 4 was better during one straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin X Ice North 4 floated at a 1.76% higher speed than the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
61.4Km/H
Michelin X Ice North 4
62.5Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin X Ice North 4

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
61.4Km/H (-1.1Km/H)
Michelin X Ice North 4
62.5Km/H

Snow Braking

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice North 4 was better during one snow braking tests. On average the Michelin X Ice North 4 stopped the vehicle in 0.4% less distance than the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
50.3M
Michelin X Ice North 4
50.1M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Michelin X Ice North 4

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
50.3M (+0.2M)
Michelin X Ice North 4
50.1M

Snow Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 and Michelin X Ice North 4 performed equally well in snow traction tests.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
5.9s
Michelin X Ice North 4
5.9s
Snow acceleration time, lower is better

Best In Snow Traction: Both tyres performed equally well

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
5.9s
Michelin X Ice North 4
5.9s

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 and Michelin X Ice North 4 performed equally well in subj. snow handling tests.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
18 Points
Michelin X Ice North 4
18 Points
Subjective Snow Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Both tyres performed equally well

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
18 Points
Michelin X Ice North 4
18 Points

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice North 4 was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Michelin X Ice North 4 stopped the vehicle 21.29% shorter than the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
47.9M
Michelin X Ice North 4
37.7M
Ice braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Ice Braking: Michelin X Ice North 4

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
47.9M (+10.2M)
Michelin X Ice North 4
37.7M

Ice Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice North 4 was better during one ice traction tests. On average the Michelin X Ice North 4 accelerated 29.17% faster than the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
7.2s
Michelin X Ice North 4
5.1s
Ice acceleration time, lower is better

Best In Ice Traction: Michelin X Ice North 4

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
7.2s (+2.1s)
Michelin X Ice North 4
5.1s

Subj. Ice Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice North 4 was better during one subj. ice handling tests. On average the Michelin X Ice North 4 scored 14.29% more points than the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
12 Points
Michelin X Ice North 4
14 Points
Subjective Ice Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Ice Handling: Michelin X Ice North 4

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
12 Points (-2 Points)
Michelin X Ice North 4
14 Points

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 scored 28.57% more points than the Michelin X Ice North 4.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
7 Points
Michelin X Ice North 4
5 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
7 Points
Michelin X Ice North 4
5 Points (-2 Points)

Subj. Noise

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 was better during one subj. noise tests. On average the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 scored 22.22% more points than the Michelin X Ice North 4.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
9 Points
Michelin X Ice North 4
7 Points
Subjective in car noise levels, higher is better

Best In Subj. Noise: Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
9 Points
Michelin X Ice North 4
7 Points (-2 Points)

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 used 0.33% less fuel than the Michelin X Ice North 4.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
5.99l/100km
Michelin X Ice North 4
6.01l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
5.988l/100km
Michelin X Ice North 4
6.012l/100km (+0.02l/100km)

Real World Driver Reviews

Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 and Michelin X Ice North 4.

In total the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tyre 0% overall.

The Michelin X Ice North 4 has been reviewed 10 times and drivers have given the tyre 84% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Michelin X Ice North 4.

Best Review for the Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1
View all Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Michelin X Ice North 4
Given 91% 205/55 R16 T on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
Uncompromising grip on all types of winter surfaces. Out of competition on the ice tracks. Very low noise level, audible only at low speeds when driving on a clean road. With these tires, it is very difficult to achieve ABS actuation. Perfectly copes with leaving the track. After running-in in compliance with the manufacturer's recommendations, the studs took their position and after 15,000 km remain in place. I recommend to buy, the best studded tire.
Helpful 1008 - tyre reviewed on February 10, 2021
View all Michelin X Ice North 4 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

Michelin X-Ice North 4 is the safer bet when icy roads are the norm. It dominates objective ice metrics-over 21% shorter ice braking distance and roughly 29% stronger ice traction versus Falken-backed by slightly better wet handling and aquaplaning resistance. Steering precision can feel sluggish and understeery on asphalt, but stability remains consistent in extremes.

Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1 appeals to drivers spending more time on clear or wet winter asphalt with only occasional ice. It stops a touch shorter in dry and wet, rides quieter and more comfortably, and sips marginally less fuel. However, on true ice it can't match Michelin's safety margin. Value-wise, Falken makes sense if pricing is favorable and ice exposure is limited; otherwise, Michelin's superior ice security justifies its premium. The practical takeaway: choose Michelin for maximum ice assurance; pick Falken for calmer, quieter mixed-winter commuting with rare ice encounters.
Key Differences
  • Ice safety margin strongly favors Michelin (37.7 m vs 47.9 m ice braking; 5.1 s vs 7.2 s traction)
  • Falken is quieter and comfier (subjective wins in noise/comfort)
  • Falken edges dry and wet braking by small but repeatable margins
  • Michelin steers more imprecisely on asphalt; Falken also slow/imprecise but less understeer-prone per feedback
  • Michelin slightly better in wet handling and aquaplaning resilience
  • Fuel economy leans to Falken (minor advantage observed)
Michelin X Ice North 4

Overall Winner: Michelin X Ice North 4

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Michelin X Ice North 4 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.