Menu

Michelin X Ice North 4

Michelin's new studded tyre with a record number of studs is now available on the market. The X-Ice North 4 won all winter tyre tests conducted by the leading newspapers. The new stud is the only stud manufactured in Europe under controlled conditions and with 100% recycled materials.

9.0
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
78%
Wet Grip
75%
Road Feedback
77%
Handling
81%
Wear
89%
Comfort
85%
Buy again
90%
Snow Grip
92%
Ice Grip
98%
11 Reviews
85% Average
127,021 miles driven
11 Tests (avg: 2nd)
Michelin X Ice North 4

Michelin X Ice North 4

Winter Premium
BETA
9 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Ice
93.9
1.2x / 25 tests
Snow
84.2
1.5x / 25 tests
Dry
73.1
1.13x / 14 tests
Value
64.5
0.42x / 6 tests
Comfort
59.8
0.32x / 9 tests
Wet
56.8
1.93x / 24 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
90.1
16 tests
Handling
77.9
35 tests
Braking
75.1
32 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 11
Publications: 6
Period: 2019 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 11
Avg Rating: 84.9%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 3.93
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test Teknikens Varld 2025 235/45 R18 5/20 6 metrics
2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test Tekniikan Maailma 2025 205/55 R16 4/14 10 metrics
2024 Studded Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2024 225/45 R17 3/8 13 metrics
The Best Studded / Friction Winter Tyres for 2024 Teknikens Varld 2024 225/50 R17 3/17 0 metrics
2023 Studded Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2023 225/45 R17 2/8 15 metrics
2021 Nordic Studded Winter Tyre Test Moottori 2021 205/55 R16 2/8 10 metrics
2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test Teknikens Varld 2021 205/55 R16 3/16 11 metrics
2020 Studded Winter Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2020 205/60 R16 1/8 13 metrics
The Best Winter Tyres for 2020 Tyre Reviews 2020 205/55 R16 1/19 0 metrics
2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test Test World 2020 205/55 R16 1/20 14 metrics
2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2019 225/50 R17 2/8 11 metrics
11
Tests
2nd
Average
1st
Best
5th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
The Michelin X-Ice North 4 provides strong grip in icy conditions, but this is paired with an unnecessarily imprecise steering feel, though controllability is maintained in extreme situations. The steering is also slow on snowy roads, but the rear maintains its grip. On asphalt, its performance is weaker, with significant understeer during evasive maneuvers making it difficult to pass obstacles, though the rear of the car remains stable.
The Michelin X-Ice North 4 achieves full marks for ice braking but struggles on actual ice roads, presenting an intriguing contradiction. How is this possible? The studded Michelin grips best when the car rolls straight, but performance deteriorates more than it should when steering input is applied. On snow, it performs well but cannot quite match the leaders. Fuel efficiency is poorer than the best studded tyres, dragging down the overall score. As the world's largest tyre manufacturer, Michelin's studded and Nordic friction tyres should be fighting at the top, but the grip level on ice and snow isn't sufficient to challenge despite the premium price tag indicating a premium product. The bare pavement performance is mediocre, typical for studded tyres, offering nothing special to compensate for the winter performance shortcomings. Overall, it's a disappointing showing from a manufacturer with Michelin's resources and reputation.
The Michelin X-Ice North 4, a studded tyre, performed adequately but not exceptionally in winter conditions. It provided good ice and snow grip but didn't stand out among other studded tyres in the test. Its main drawback was very poor rolling resistance, which significantly lowered its overall rating and negatively impacted fuel efficiency. The tyre offered decent comfort and stability but couldn't compete with the top performers in the test.

The used version of the Michelin X-Ice North 4 studded tyre showed how performance changes over time. After 4,000 km, it still retained acceptable winter performance, especially on ice and snow. However, it struggled significantly with wet braking and aquaplaning resistance. The tyre's rolling resistance had improved with wear. This performance illustrates how studded tyres can maintain some winter capabilities even with significant wear.

Questions and Answers for the Michelin X Ice North 4

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Michelin X Ice North 4. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 8 user reviews

Drivers largely praise the Michelin X Ice North 4 for outstanding grip on ice and snow, predictable handling, and surprisingly low noise for a studded tyre. Many report strong stud retention and durability over multiple winters, though one user experienced significant stud loss and another noted grip variability on loose-snow-over-ice at low speeds. Overall, the tyre is viewed as a top-tier winter performer with minor, less frequent concerns about stud loss and grip predictability in specific conditions.

Strengths
  • Ice and snow grip
  • Handling/control
  • Low noise for studded tyre
  • Overall winter performance
  • Stud durability (for most users)
Areas for Improvement
  • Grip inconsistency on loose snow over hard ice (minor)
  • Stud loss reported by one user (isolated)

Top 3 Michelin X Ice North 4 Reviews

Given 83% while driving a Ford Focus mk2 (225/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 6 average miles
Coming from Finland, a country of winter snow and studs. Have these on two cars
- 2007 Focus Cabrio
- 1998 996 C2

In most winnter conditions amazing grip level. However, two shortcomings. 1) The modern light studs do not penetrate well if there is loose snow on top of hard snor/icy surface. Obviously this has more to do with regulations rather than the tyre brand and model. 2) These modern silica tyres seem to collect a layer of snow in slow speeds, say below 30..40 km/h . Both these properties make the tyres a bit Jekyll and Hyde. At best it gives enormous amount of grip but then you come on loose snow and you think you are driving very slow - and suddenly you have absolutely no grip. I wish we could still have the longer studs. I can tell it is not nice to get the impression of good grip for some 50 km (0.3 < muu < 0.5) and then in an open place wind has collected snow on the hard snow surface and a deer runs into your lights and you find absolutely no grip at all (like muu = 0.05). Fortunately I had my insurances. I dont think this would have happened with the old style big block, long heavy stud Hakkapeliittas. Those would have not given the level of grip on the 50 km stretch but they would have lost pretty much nothing coming to the loose snow.

What impresses me is the strong stud base. The cavity seems wrapped with a very strong compound and the studs seem to not come off at all. The construction of the tyre seems very good for winter purposes, not too stiff nor too soft side wall. Subjectively I think I would prefer a sharper shoulder but that is more like an image in my head rather than supported by my driving experience.

If I was to develop this tyre I would look into the slow speed attached snow layer phenomenom - perhaps on all the silica tyres. I also would like to try something like raised tread on the lines of studs to get the modern studs penetrate better the loose snow on top of the hard.

I know one problem with the winter tyre testing is that the tracks are always similar to get good comparability. But in real life the surfaces vary much more in winter conditions and a good winter tyre should even the grip levels to predictable. As good as the X-Ice 4 is it is not the most predictable tyre. Fortunately you can learn to predict the places where you will loose the grip. I find this all more of a result of rather compromized regulations than tyre makes development work.
March 22, 2024
Given 89% while driving a Ford Focus (215/55 R17) on mostly town for 0 average miles
The best I have tried in winter conditions. Fantastic grip on ice and snow, comfortable ride and the studs seem to last much longer than on others I have owned. Going into the 5th winter of mostly urban driving in Reykjavik I can see that most of the studs have come loose now so they will be disappearing soon. I used to run Goodyear ultra grip ice arctic on my cars before, but the ride was rougher and noisier, the studs would be long gone by now and they did not have as much grip on snow and ice. The Goodyears had a better grip in the wet at high speeds though.
October 23, 2023
Given 76% while driving a Kia Motors GT limited AWD (225/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 18,000 spirited miles
I've had the North4 studded tire for 3 winters ( 20-25 000 Km) in Manitoba Canada on a 2018 Kia Stinger GT limited AWD. They have never let me down, starting and stopping driving normal, is like driving in summer, but with some light tiktac clacking from the studs. The road noise is much better than any other studded tire due to advances in technology. I can feel a certain amount of slippage in rain and dry concrete, but on snow and ice ( and that's 90% of the roads here in winter) they dig in like claws. I drive in sport mode and it splits my power 80/20 to the back, and have the best control I have ever had in very bad conditions. The tires surpass my every exception and will be purchased again!
December 4, 2022

How would you rate the Michelin X Ice North 4?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Michelin X Ice North 4 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 94% while driving a Volkswagen Passat B8 1.8 TSI RLine 180PS (215/60 R16) on for 32,000 miles
Great tyres, bought new for winter 2021-2022.impressed by the lack of noise from studs on clear pavement. Used them on my WV Passat, and tread life is extremely high, went trough 32 000 miles. The first 25 000 miles only polished away just 1,5mm and took 4 winter seasons, but this winter after 10 000 miles I lost 4mm. And because they are now on the legal limit, will change them. I had similar experiences with Michelin x-ice north3, where the first mm holded extremely long, and after 20 000 miles they started to loose tread us other soft Nordic compound tyres. Now decided to try the Nokian Hakapelita 10.
February 25, 2026
Given 81% while driving a Toyota Matrix (Corolla wagon) FWD (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 15 average miles
Bought these three winters ago. First impressions were excellent with quiet highway and excellent traction. However, at end of the first season we noticed the front tires lost a lot of studs and submitted a warranty claim. Got the front two replaced (prorated of of course). The second winter season was short due to warranty replacement but we did loose studs on older tires. Third winter we lost studs on all 4 tires. One tire is missing 54 studs, and other tire 40 studs and the newer tires are missing 18 and 9 studs. We maybe have 20,000 km on the newer tires and max 30,000 km on all of them. These are installed on base Toyota matrix so not a power house car. We also have a van with Hakkepeleta tires (8 and before and now 10’s) for years and never have a studs loss issues. My recommendation is go with Nordman or Hakkepeleta. I love Michelin tires but they haven’t figures out the studs part. Hope these make this season then switching to Nokian.
October 24, 2025
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 82% while driving a Volkswagen 2019 Golf Variant 1.5 TSI (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 17,000 average miles
Very good tyres, on par with Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8, or even better when they were new. Maybe a bit faster wearing compared to Hakka8, but definitely better than Continental IceContact2. Of course these are not summer tyres, so my scoring is compared to other winter tyres.
April 22, 2023
Given 86% while driving a Audi 80 B4 (195/60 R15) on a combination of roads for 5,000 spirited miles
This tire was bought for my old analogue awd car for use partially on road and ice track and it has been phenomenal. It made a twitchy and understeery car much more direct and leaning towards oversteer in a very preferable manner both in thems of controllability and for road feedback. My tires are quite narrow and has a bit of a wallowy feel on dry road. The width also dictates the feel of the tire in the wet, but is very much as expected from any studded tire in this dimmension. It made my car feel much more communicative in low friction enviorements
April 9, 2023
Given 91% while driving a BMW 520d M Sport (245/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
This is by far the best Winter Tyre i have ever used. Compared to its competitors its miles better. The grip is outstanding, and the overall performance is perfect. I would never choose another Tyre, unless its he next generation.
October 18, 2022
Given 91% while driving a Toyota Corolla E140 (205/55 R16 T) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
Uncompromising grip on all types of winter surfaces. Out of competition on the ice tracks. Very low noise level, audible only at low speeds when driving on a clean road. With these tires, it is very difficult to achieve ABS actuation. Perfectly copes with leaving the track. After running-in in compliance with the manufacturer's recommendations, the studs took their position and after 15,000 km remain in place. I recommend to buy, the best studded tire.
February 10, 2021
Rate the Michelin X Ice North 4