Michelin X Ice Snow vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
The headline contrast is clear in the scoring: Nokian takes four overall test wins to Michelin's two, driven by emphatic ice and snow traction/braking advantages. Michelin counters with best-in-class comfort, low noise, better rolling resistance and fuel consumption, and stronger aquaplaning resistance-attributes that matter when roads are often wet, slushy, or dry rather than purely frozen.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been six tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Michelin X Ice Snow | two | |
| Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 | four |
While it might look like the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 is better than the Michelin X Ice Snow purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Exceptional comfort and low noise (10/10 noise and damping; consistently top subjective noise scores)
- Lower rolling resistance and better fuel economy (e.g., 5.726 vs 5.946 l/100km; best RR in 2022 test)
- Strong aquaplaning resistance (e.g., 62 vs 57.6 km/h straight-line aqua)
- Competitive snow/ice handling balance and stability with predictable manners (occasional wins in snow and ice handling)
- Class-leading ice and snow traction/braking (multiple double-digit advantages; perfect 80/80 winter grip in 2025)
- Predictable, confident behavior on extreme slipperiness with precise steering feel on ice
- Consistently strong winter-surface lap times and subjective control in snow/ice
- Improved wet performance versus prior studded generations while retaining winter supremacy
Dry Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 stopped the vehicle in 60.17% less distance than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Dry Braking: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was 100% faster around a lap than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during two subj. dry handling tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow scored 92.99% more points than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 stopped the vehicle in 53.96% less distance than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Wet Braking: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during four wet handling [s] tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was 70.1% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during three subj. wet handling tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow scored 89.34% more points than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was 100% faster around a wet circle than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Wet Circle: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow floated at a 71.11% higher speed than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow slipped out at a 100% higher speed than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during three snow braking tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 stopped the vehicle in 0.65% less distance than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Snow Braking: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during three snow traction tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 accelerated 2.31% faster than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Snow Traction: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [s]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during two snow handling [s] tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was 0.34% faster around a lap than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Snow Handling [s]: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Snow Handling
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during two subj. snow handling tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 scored 3.6% more points than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was 0.65% faster around a snow circle than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Snow Circle: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was 10.41% faster through a slalom than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Snow Slalom: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during four ice braking tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 stopped the vehicle 21.47% shorter than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Ice Braking: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Ice Traction
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during four ice traction tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 accelerated 34.47% faster than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Ice Traction: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Ice Traction winner was calculated >>
Ice Handling [s]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one ice handling [s] tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was 6.13% faster around a lap than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Ice Handling [s]: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Ice Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Ice Handling
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during one subj. ice handling tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow scored 0.82% more points than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Subj. Ice Handling: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Subj. Ice Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during three subj. comfort tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow scored 95.63% more points than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Subj. Noise
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during two subj. noise tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow scored 26.32% more points than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Subj. Noise: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one noise tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 measured 100% quieter than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Noise: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one noise tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 measured 100% quieter than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Noise: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during one price tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow cost 7.69% less than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Price: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 had a 46.1% lower rolling resistance than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow used 3.7% less fuel than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Michelin X Ice Snow Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Michelin X Ice Snow highly for confident winter performance, especially strong traction and braking on snow and generally solid grip on ice, with predictable handling. Comfort and noise are typically praised, and several note slow wear. A minority report weaker performance on wet or smooth/black ice and average dry/wet road grip versus all-season or studded options. Overall sentiment is strongly positive with durability and winter grip leading the praise.
Based on 16 reviews with an average rating of 84%
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 highly for outstanding grip and control on ice, hard-packed snow, and deep snow, delivering strong winter confidence and safety. Several high-scoring reviews also note minimal wear over time. However, some users report intrusive road noise on pavement and average feel/feedback on dry/wet roads, and a couple of mid-scoring reviews cite notable performance decline after 2 seasons or ~20k miles. Overall sentiment is positive, with winter traction as the standout strength.
Based on 8 reviews with an average rating of 76%
Conclusion
For mixed winter use with long stretches of clear, wet, or slushy tarmac, the Michelin X Ice Snow makes a compelling case. It is markedly quieter and more comfortable, shows better aquaplaning resistance (e.g., 62 vs 57.6 km/h), lower fuel consumption, and lower rolling resistance, and it's typically cheaper. However, its ice grip lags the Nokian meaningfully in most recent tests, and dry/wet braking/handling can be middling in newer results. In short: choose Nokian for maximum frozen-road security; choose Michelin for everyday comfort and efficiency where ice is occasional and road noise matters.
Key Differences
- Ice performance: Nokian dominates ice braking/traction (often 18-30% shorter/faster), while Michelin trails despite occasional handling wins.
- Snow traction/braking: Nokian generally ahead; Michelin can match or edge in isolated handling laps but not in traction metrics.
- Comfort/noise: Michelin is substantially quieter and more refined; Nokian is louder/harsh due to studs.
- Efficiency: Michelin has lower rolling resistance and better fuel consumption; Nokian's RR is high and can penalize economy.
- Wet/aquaplaning: Michelin leads aquaplaning; recent tests show Nokian slightly better in wet braking/handling, but results vary by size/test.
- Price/value: Michelin typically cheaper up-front; Nokian offers maximum winter grip at a premium with on-road compromises.
Overall Winner: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.